Still reaping the benefits from his usual references I see, and continuing to make them look as corny as hell. At least it's a short video and not some waste of a runway show.
I like Daniel's Schiaparelli, but it so shallow. This generation of designers seems to believe that fashion didn't exist until the late 70s. Despite being a spawn of MGC, Guyon seemed to actually show an interest in the house beyond the 80s designers that referenced it.
WTF is this, none of Schiaparelli's house codes are there, this brand has the potential to be like Lanvin, Schiaparelli was such an influential designer . LadyJunon is right, its like they did NOT bother to look at her vast archives from the 30s and 40s
This guy is unable to design a single look without adding golden touches here and there...he is like a crow, the moment he looks something shiny...here he comes!!
Also, could the CEO of Schiaparelli remind him he is not at Moschino? Thank you!
I'm already tired of him. He thinks that using that same tired shade of gold and the same styling tricks is going to create an identity for him. Sorry, but it's not. This just shows that he is already designed himself into a corner.
There are differences between having an identity or being consistent and being a one-note designer. And Daniel is the latter.
The white draped column dress is lovely, the red hooded dress isn’t bad and…the rest leaves me cold.
Nothing can breathe among this deluge of gold hardware. He’s not confident enough to develop a language that goes beyond surface level, that is centered around cut and let go of the same tired tropes that plague his every collection.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.