Supreme Court Backs Anna Nicole Smith

cosmogrl5

Fashionably Late
Joined
Aug 21, 2005
Messages
6,526
Reaction score
22
From Aol News today:


20060228111709990001


WASHINGTON (May 1) - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that one-time stripper and Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith can pursue part of her late husband's oil fortune.

Justices were unanimous in giving new legal life to Smith's bid to collect millions of dollars from the estate of J. Howard Marshall II, which has been estimated at as much as $1.6 billion.

Smith has been embroiled in a long running cross-country court fight with Marshall's youngest son, E. Pierce Marshall. The court's decision means that it will likely not end anytime soon - although there is no guarantee she will collect any money.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the opinion that a Texas court did not have the last word when it ruled against the blonde reality television star.
"This is just another battle in a very long war," said Douglas Baird, a bankruptcy expert at the University of Chicago.
The ruling gives federal courts more authority to resolve disputes that arise out of estates.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a separate opinion to say that he would have given federal courts more jurisdiction. He said Smith's appeal was "an easy case."
Smith was a 26-year-old topless dancer when she married Marshall, then 89, in 1994. He died the following year, setting off an intense family fight.
At issue for the justices was competing court jurisdiction. A Texas court held a five-month trial before deciding that Smith was entitled to nothing from Marshall's estate. Smith brought a separate claim in federal court in California.
Justices said Monday that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was wrong in ruling that federal courts could not handle Smith's case.
Smith, the spokeswoman for a diet products company, had been awarded $474 million by a federal bankruptcy judge. That was later reduced by a federal district judge and then thrown out altogether by the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit. The case now goes back to California.
"I will continue to fight to uphold my father's estate plan," Pierce Marshall said Monday.
Ginsburg noted that there are several pending issues that could still keep Smith from collecting any money.
Before his death Marshall showered Smith with $6.6 million in gifts that included two homes, expensive jewelry and clothes. She contends that he also promised her half his estate.
Ginsburg's opinion, and announcement from the bench, included only a hint of the nastiness of the family feud. She said there were accusations that Pierce Marshall "engaged in forgery, fraud, and overreaching to gain control of his father's assets" and, on the other side, that Smith had defamed her former stepson.
Pierce Marshall said in a statement that he would "fight to clear my name in California federal court. That is a promise that (Smith) and her lawyers can take to the bank."
Smith's case had brought unusual drama to the normally sedate high court.
Dressed in all black, she wept in the courtroom in late February as justices discussed Marshall and whether he had intended to provide for his young wife in death. When Smith arrived at the court, several photographers were knocked to the ground in a scuffle to take her picture.

05/01/06 12:41 EDT
 
You know she still hasn't gotten one penny of her inheritence years after his death? I think she should be rewarded at least 50 million for sleeping with a man that old. I mean that's gotta take A LOT plus I know she brought him a lot of happiness in his dying years even if she is a gold digger. It's not like he was some Hugh Hefner he was disgusting!
 
Yea also if they got married and there's no prenup or anything. I think her husband was smart enough to know what he was getting into (ex. having pay her some type of inheritance) when he married her. He must have some brains in order to build up that fortune of his. :p
 
style_savy said:
You know she still hasn't gotten one penny of her inheritence years after his death? I think she should be rewarded at least 50 million for sleeping with a man that old. I mean that's gotta take A LOT plus I know she brought him a lot of happiness in his dying years even if she is a gold digger. It's not like he was some Hugh Hefner he was disgusting!

ITA. If she is still fighting after all these years and slept with that old man, just give her the moola already!
 
style_savy said:
You know she still hasn't gotten one penny of her inheritence years after his death? I think she should be rewarded at least 50 million for sleeping with a man that old. I mean that's gotta take A LOT plus I know she brought him a lot of happiness in his dying years even if she is a gold digger. It's not like he was some Hugh Hefner he was disgusting!

Good point. Plus, I think he was aware that the money intrested her...and he apparently didn't care.

Not like he married her for her brains or personality. She deserves what the law says she deserves. If it were the money of some middle class guy who made $300,000 a year no one would even care.
 
They are probably all horrible people -Anna, the family, the tycoon. Give em all the money and let them be miserable together
 
I'm glad the court ruled in her favor, and hope she winds up with a good chunk of change down the road.

Did she marry him for his money? Of course!

Did he marry her for her t*ts and ***? Of course!

Did they both understand what their appeal to the other was? Of course!

To me, the son is every bit as much a "gold digger"; and has no more right to the money than she does. Less, even. Children aren't owed their parents' fortune, and marriages happen every day for reasons other than true, everlasting, spiritual love. She gave her husband what he wanted and made him a very happy man at the end of her life. She deserves every penny of what he intended for her to have.
 
Anastasia said:
I'm glad the court ruled in her favor, and hope she winds up with a good chunk of change down the road.

Did she marry him for his money? Of course!

Did he marry her for her t*ts and ***? Of course!

Did they both understand what their appeal to the other was? Of course!

Fantastic breakdown. I love it! :lol:
 
"The ruling gives federal courts more authority to resolve disputes that arise out of estates."

I'm blazingly happy the Supreme Court had the courage to take on this issue, which is important to all Americans, namely, the Right to Get Half. We all should get half in the event of the untimely (or timely) death of our spouse, partner, or parent, because when we get half, the government gets at least third of each halving that occurs in inheritance taxes. Which leads to more money all around for more of these kinds of decisions to be made.

In the event she does get her well-earned half, Ms. Smith should be careful in investing it in real estate in "blighted" neighborhoods, as the Court also recently altered eminent domain law to entitle state and city governments to force sales of land and property not just for a highway or new hospital, but for strip malls, strip clubs, or whatever other use the private industry might have for it.

Invest well, Anna, keep it fluid, because there's federal hands on your house and inheritance now. They've got a job lined up for you at the Climaxx I, II, and III out on Route 22, right on the site of the house you used to own. Dance, sister, dance! In cha cha heels!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,769
Messages
15,236,942
Members
87,670
Latest member
Copleybear2
Back
Top