^ I think it's not so much that you forget when you're very young, you just know aging happens... to people/others. There's an element of arrogance involved. Aging honestly did not dawn on me
at all until I made it to 30 and dealt with a line that wouldn't go away with ice or past 10 am
. It's actually quite interesting to begin to 'accumulate' aging bills and realising that they're not at all unfamiliar to you and you got plenty of warnings since your teenage years, you just ignored it cause they were whiny organs, nothing others could see.
With that delusional mindset that aging is selective, a huge budget and pressure from surroundings and social media and the total lack of confidence to be yourself that you feel as women in your late teens/early 20s (we are, most of the time,
exclusively judged for our appearance), I can see how someone would go to town with these procedures. It really is not unlike the people that say they will kill themselves unless they get breast implants and that it is 'vital' for transitioning (it is not). I don't mind so much the way motives are founded but the ethics in the medical field (especially among plastic surgeons) and the way big pharma seems to have a firm grip on it and is clearly benefitting from this.
There seems to be no solid psychological screening AND proper audits to these facilities that easily bring anyone under the knife and it's highly irresponsible because, the one thing that is constantly downplayed, neglected and promoted as if it was manageable is the aging process and that will ultimately determine everything and it really is not that manageable. So whatever you are doing to people now to "help" them, it will only reignite and exacerbate that pain in 15 years time, which no surgery will be able to fully repair, because you're literally dealing with very fine, unforgiving layers of skin.
One example is the amount of lip work.. everyone seems to have that (it just takes scrolling to the bottom of their feed to realise that), and seem to be under the impression that being able to take out the fillers any time is what sets them apart from the old fillers that would make you look scary and grotesque later in life. The skin on the lips is thin and not that keen on elasticity to begin (reason why we all develop lines on them pretty quickly, even in our teens). I was looking at the recent story on Vogue with Kendall Jenner, and I have a feeling that having no fillers is somehow a part of the contract to continue to work with Vogue?, so she doesn't have them in these pictures. She just turned 27 and her lip texture screams tired/older than 27, which means that in order to look 'plump' she probably needs more fillers than she initially did and the dose will have to keep incrementing as the skin continues to shrink and sag. The impact later in life is really not that different from the 'old-school', non-removable fillers since you'll need them anyways, so what happened to Esther Canadas, Gelsey Kirkland.. that's on the cards.
I'm not really against cosmetic procedures and definitely think there's sexism involved in how we judge them (we're happy for men who fix their teeth, nose and get rid of acne scars for example) but the lack of regulation or minimal sense of ethics involved does make you wonder if someone has something prepared for the psychological repercussions and cosmetic reconstruction work it will require years down the line, which will be more severe if you add the key role of social media and the abandonment people will experience through that (some kind of Paulina Porizkova effect..).