A Materialistic Society?

Thanks! As you can probably guess, this stuff has been on my mind lately, and it's very refreshing to be able to bat these topics around with other people who "get it" while being pretty much in the same boat I am.

What's really ironic is hardly anybody seems to realize you don't need logos and a huge amount of money to look "right enough" to play the Manhattan Society game. It often comes down to a question of personality and time. Since I make my own schedule, I can work as much or as little as I want...I was lucky enough to find roomates in East Williamsburg, so my rent is only $350 a month--and I still get to spend all my time in Manhattan. I work hard enough to pay six months of rent at a time, forget about it, and have almost unlimited leisure for half a year.

Volunteer in the afternoon? Sure. Lunch with the Ladies? No problem. Fencing lessons, make my own jewelry, night class at Julliard, take in the new exhibit at the Met, kick back in Central Park with a good book? You bet.

I can joke that instead of being an "independently wealthy lady of leisure" I'm actually an "independently impoverished lady of leisure--" but independent and leisurely all the same. LOL!

My other biggest expenses have been membership in two private "society clubs", which gave me the chance to meet people who've offered to propose me for membership in more clubs than I could possibly afford. (Union League, Metropolitan, New York Athletic, etc.) As long as you "look right" and know how to make interesting conversation, people usually won't think to ask. And when they do, I try to be upfront about it and laugh it off... people seem to respect the fact that I'm doing things my own way.

Pretension is the kiss of death, so why not work your relative poverty as the angle that's going to make you memorable and different? Besides, I sometimes suspect when I say "Williamsburg" they must be thinking "Million dollar condos in the Gretsch Building" instead of "crappy three-story walk up in an industrial zone." No need to go out of my way to correct this misapprehension, but if it came down to it, I wouldn't lie.

Time is so much more important to me than money...and believe me, I know how to pinch a penny till it screams the safeword. Hetty Green ain't got nothing on me! But unlike Hetty, I splurge in the places that make the difference. Why have five bad outfits when you could have one of the very best? I don't do casual, ever. Why? One very simple reason: *Because I don't have to*. Baudelaire was right. Dress is a conscious choice and existential statement. If I eschew t-shirts and khakis to go all-out to look like I just stepped out of 1953 Vogue, it's nobody's business if I do.

If the choice is between wearing used Herrera and Louboutin, stringing my own pearls, volunteering in exchange for tickets to major charity events, getting my hair done at Bergdorf as a hair model-- while simultaneously having the equivalent six days a week off... instead of getting the exact same things new/full price and spending all my time working or having to put up with a boring rich windbag, there's no toss up. At the end of the day, I look fabulous and my time is my own. What could be better than that?

It seems you can't really talk about materialism and making an impression in "the right clothes" without at least mentioning the most unpleasant subject of weight. In fact, the ugly three-hundred-pound gorilla in Manhattan Society's collective closet is the raging epidemic of eating disorders. (Actually, it might be more apt to call it a very sleek eighty-seven pound gorilla...but you get what I mean!)

Sad but true, the quickest way to boost your social prospects is to lose twenty pounds, health be damned. It seems like most everybody here either starves, throws up, snorts coke or smokes, or some ungodly combination of all of the above. (If you don't believe me, try going to the Bergdorf Goodman bathroom around one o' clock some afternoon. Not a pretty aural and olfactory environment, to put it politely.) There's just no reward to be had in liking yourself the way you are. Case study: I have a friend who's a professional model. I've been trying to encourage to get better eating habits and quit smoking, since she's been getting sick and faint from losing even more weight. But hey, guess what? She just got a new contract for a jeans company after being spotted at a club. Who do you think she's going to listen to now.

After I moved to Manhattan, I went from a size 10/12 to a size 4/6 just by being less sedentary and cutting carbs. The sick thing is, even though I love the way I look, I think and worry about it far more than I ever did when I was bigger. Why does it have to be so hard to feel good about being a 4/6 just because everyone around you is a 00/0! Insanity!

All the same, I refuse to harm my metabolism and endanger my health, no matter how much pressure there is to take one of the tried-and-true self-loathing shortcuts. I guess there's nothing to do but keep eating the right things and working out. Another sick thing is that so many people are so jaded, they assume it's normal to have some kind of disorder unless you explicitly specify otherwise. People have offered me coke (and I don't mean the beverage), asked "So. Do you eat?" and once, when somebody saw me eating with a normally healthy appetite, actually had the gall to ask me if "I keep it down"!!! You can't win for losing.

Oh well....great posts, guys.

~L.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's the still of the night here , and I've just woken up in horribly humid weather conditions , groping my way to the fridge for a cold juice .

What you say is indeed VERY enlightening and I will reply to you properly when I am fully awake and on the qui vive .

In the meanwhile , many thanks for shedding new light in this discussion and I'm REALLY pleased that you have seen fit to return .:flower:
 
Interesting posts throughout this thread.

In ‘Notebook on Cities and Clothes’—which I watched again this weekend at the Yamamoto exhibit—Yohji speaks about his fascination with old photographs…How the beauty of the clothing in these images lies in the fact that the clothes were not consumed: A warm winter coat was a necessity to survive cold winter and thus becomes truly beautiful in his eyes...and how it would make him so happy if his clothes were to be worn in this way. At the same time he states this in a wistful way knowing that of course this is not possible. I thought this was such a thoughtful passage.

As for me, I was very much raised by a conscious consumer mother in the 70s-> We did not have a tv, did not buy plastic toys made in Taiwan, no junk food… yet my mother did reconcile this with a love and appreciation of art & the luxury of fashion…I like to think growing up this way has at least taught me to be appreciative and not wasteful, though my lifestyle is not nearly as genuine as hers.
 
I think I approach clothes in a similar way to frugalsquirrel, except I'll add two more items for "criteria"

After 10 years, will I still be able to wear this without looking completely dated and ridiculous?
Will this even last 10 years?

As for the rest of the thread, I'd love to contribute but I'm afraid some of my thoughts may come off as simple venting. I'm also confused about whether we are discussing mindless consumerism (as in buying for the sake of buying) , or if we are critiqing spending, like an outrageously priced $5000 dollar pair of jeans. Does any of that make sense?

As for the Faust/Paulw discussion. I have seen first hand, examples of kids in high school that buy the che gueverra shirts without knowing his story or a thing about socialism and communism. I guess they heard from word-of mouth "Che was some rebel who wore a cool hat." That being said, sincere activism that Paulw described is applaudable. I think it is great for us "youngsters" to be active about socio-political issues, we are getting this world loaned to us after all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
frugalsquirrel said:
Thanks! As you can probably guess, this stuff has been on my mind lately, and it's very refreshing to be able to bat these topics around with other people who "get it" while being pretty much in the same boat I am.

What's really ironic is hardly anybody seems to realize you don't need logos and a huge amount of money to look "right enough" to play the Manhattan Society game. It often comes down to a question of personality and time. Since I make my own schedule, I can work as much or as little as I want...I was lucky enough to find roomates in East Williamsburg, so my rent is only $350 a month--and I still get to spend all my time in Manhattan. I work hard enough to pay six months of rent at a time, forget about it, and have almost unlimited leisure for half a year.

Volunteer in the afternoon? Sure. Lunch with the Ladies? No problem. Fencing lessons, make my own jewelry, night class at Julliard, take in the new exhibit at the Met, kick back in Central Park with a good book? You bet.

I can joke that instead of being an "independently wealthy lady of leisure" I'm actually an "independently impoverished lady of leisure--" but independent and leisurely all the same. LOL!

My other biggest expenses have been membership in two private "society clubs", which gave me the chance to meet people who've offered to propose me for membership in more clubs than I could possibly afford. (Union League, Metropolitan, New York Athletic, etc.) As long as you "look right" and know how to make interesting conversation, people usually won't think to ask. And when they do, I try to be upfront about it and laugh it off... people seem to respect the fact that I'm doing things my own way.

Pretension is the kiss of death, so why not work your relative poverty as the angle that's going to make you memorable and different? Besides, I sometimes suspect when I say "Williamsburg" they must be thinking "Million dollar condos in the Gretsch Building" instead of "crappy three-story walk up in an industrial zone." No need to go out of my way to correct this misapprehension, but if it came down to it, I wouldn't lie.

Time is so much more important to me than money...and believe me, I know how to pinch a penny till it screams the safeword. Hetty Green ain't got nothing on me! But unlike Hetty, I splurge in the places that make the difference. Why have five bad outfits when you could have one of the very best? I don't do casual, ever. Why? One very simple reason: *Because I don't have to*. Baudelaire was right. Dress is a conscious choice and existential statement. If I eschew t-shirts and khakis to go all-out to look like I just stepped out of 1953 Vogue, it's nobody's business if I do.

If the choice is between wearing used Herrera and Louboutin, stringing my own pearls, volunteering in exchange for tickets to major charity events, getting my hair done at Bergdorf as a hair model-- while simultaneously having the equivalent six days a week off... instead of getting the exact same things new/full price and spending all my time working or having to put up with a boring rich windbag, there's no toss up. At the end of the day, I look fabulous and my time is my own. What could be better than that?

It seems you can't really talk about materialism and making an impression in "the right clothes" without at least mentioning the most unpleasant subject of weight. In fact, the ugly three-hundred-pound gorilla in Manhattan Society's collective closet is the raging epidemic of eating disorders. (Actually, it might be more apt to call it a very sleek eighty-seven pound gorilla...but you get what I mean!)

Sad but true, the quickest way to boost your social prospects is to lose twenty pounds, health be damned. It seems like most everybody here either starves, throws up, snorts coke or smokes, or some ungodly combination of all of the above. (If you don't believe me, try going to the Bergdorf Goodman bathroom around one o' clock some afternoon. Not a pretty aural and olfactory environment, to put it politely.) There's just no reward to be had in liking yourself the way you are. Case study: I have a friend who's a professional model. I've been trying to encourage to get better eating habits and quit smoking, since she's been getting sick and faint from losing even more weight. But hey, guess what? She just got a new contract for a jeans company after being spotted at a club. Who do you think she's going to listen to now.

After I moved to Manhattan, I went from a size 10/12 to a size 4/6 just by being less sedentary and cutting carbs. The sick thing is, even though I love the way I look, I think and worry about it far more than I ever did when I was bigger. Why does it have to be so hard to feel good about being a 4/6 just because everyone around you is a 00/0! Insanity!

All the same, I refuse to harm my metabolism and endanger my health, no matter how much pressure there is to take one of the tried-and-true self-loathing shortcuts. I guess there's nothing to do but keep eating the right things and working out. Another sick thing is that so many people are so jaded, they assume it's normal to have some kind of disorder unless you explicitly specify otherwise. People have offered me coke (and I don't mean the beverage), asked "So. Do you eat?" and once, when somebody saw me eating with a normally healthy appetite, actually had the gall to ask me if "I keep it down"!!! You can't win for losing.

Oh well....great posts, guys.

~L.

I just wanted to thank you for a very intelligent interesting post :smile:
 
ditto...hurrah frugalsquirrel...
we don't agree on everything..but i respect your very thoughtful post...

hope you stick around...:flower:
 
But are human needs and wants not the backbone of progress?

However, I believe things go wrong when we, as a society, lose focus of our real needs: the elimination of poverty, cure for disease, etc. Sometimes people just need a dose of reality.
 
This is so true for me too... It seems that clothes/shoes/bags fill in what I'm lacking socially, like if nothing else will make me happy, clothes will.
 
Absolutely, we live in a very materialistic world. Today's society revolves around the almighty dollar. Instead of helping others, we are revolving around how much we can save and it's all gimme, gimme, gimme. We are choosing quantity over quality. Our economy will shut down real soon if people don't stop worshipping the "money gods". They should really start focusing on what's really important.
As for clothing (and I'm sure that is what this thread was really meant for) yeah, it's awesome to look good and feel your best, but people need to realize that they are no better than the next guy/gal. We are all human beings and all put one pant leg on at a time. ^_^
 
From a fashion-newbie's viewpoint, I'm not here to learn how to be creative, I've always been creative. I'm learning how to dress for other women, I'm doing this to get along with them.

It's nice when you can combine the two, but when I just use my unadulterated creativity, I'm quite certain it results in so many people seeing it as "fashion victim", people who I would like to get along with, who I wouldn't like judging me negatively before we've even met. And sadly, this is not the rare snob in the crowd, this is most people.

A person doesn't have to be evil or shallow to make assumptions based on what someone or something looks like, our brains are wired to do it as a way "save time and effort". We try to fight it when we realize it, but most of this happens automatically and subconsciously.

Interestingly the first thing we look for when we recognize that a something is a human being, is whether it is female or male (and as soon as we recognize which one, we already automatically have a whole bunch of subconscious ideas about that person!)

As for materialistic society? The stores and designers are looking to make a buck and they've learned how to exploit this problem (just like anyone else looking to make a buck!) They make it harder and harder to dress "well". They also can't be blamed much though, because this is what it takes to succeed in the business world. And when they can, they (like the customers) throw in all the creativity they can.

Fashion is mostly business, but part art too :flower: There is a place for it in a healthy, happy person's life, but you know yourself when it's getting out of control!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yasmin said:
From a fashion-newbie's viewpoint, I'm not here to learn how to be creative, I've always been creative. I'm learning how to dress for other women, I'm doing this to get along with them.

Maybe those women aren't worth getting along with? ^_^ I've definitely had friends who couldn't give a rat's *** about fashion, and that was not a problem for me. Maybe I would occasionally tease them about being color blind, or having a rule against carrying a bag not made of ripstop nylon, but that's the extent of it. If you're going to change your look, I think you should have a better reason than that :flower:

Some great stuff on this thread, I've enjoyed what I've read.
 
Actually I edited my post a bit to clarify before I saw your reply, hope the idea makes sense now (I am not talking about a narrow group of people, I'm talking all of us)
 
Yasmin said:
There is a place for it in a healthy, happy person's life, but you know yourself when it's getting out of control!!

some people, never notice when getting out of control Yasmin ...fashion can be addictive because it satisfies a social/emotional need

i agree with fashionista-ta on not 'worth it' to dress for 'others' but i also understand your own point.
dress is a comunication code, it instantly transmits social/esthetic background

consumerism though is a different ship all together, hasnt much to do with style or esthetics, see one can be an addictive consumer of trash clothes or of luxe labels, the situation is the same, nothing to do with how much you spend, its the NEED to spend in order to feel you exist ..

btw, welcome to tFS yasmin, keep that creativity going :flower:
 
Ok, I'm going to play the devil's advocate here and say "Please don't automatically boycott the sweatshops." :blush: It's true, some poor Asian girls are pawning their souls at a sewing machine for a pittance while Big Brand rakes in the profits, but that's better for them than prowling the STD-infested streets and selling themselves. They need to get themselves out of poverty, one step at a time, maybe even one generation at a time. and be assured that with an emerging middle class, education and better access to knowledge, legal rights will follow.

Materialism and greed will be with us, it's simply human nature. I don't like it, I'm merely acknowledging this unsavoury reality. Instead of boycotting, better still to support organisations that attempt to channel our materialism to some good, eg. buy FairTrade coffee, buy from treehugger.com, donate your designer castoffs to Oxfam.

I think it's a good idea to talk about it, to make your feelings or even guilt known even if it won't change the world. Simply having a conscience is a good start, doing something about it is even better. Awareness even without action is better than plain jaded Apathy anytime.
 
Zazie said:
Ok, I'm going to play the devil's advocate here and say "Please don't automatically boycott the sweatshops." :blush: It's true, some poor Asian girls are pawning their souls at a sewing machine for a pittance while Big Brand rakes in the profits, but that's better for them than prowling the STD-infested streets and selling themselves. They need to get themselves out of poverty, one step at a time, maybe even one generation at a time. and be assured that with an emerging middle class, education and better access to knowledge, legal rights will follow.

How coincidental that I just read an article on that today! It is indeed true. It was about some carpet company fabricating in Pakistan. But because of some rumours about child labor in the production, the company decided to break with the Pakistanian factory's because it could not guarantee child labor-less products. Now, the majority of those kids are prostitutes and bound to live on the streets.

It's just a doublesided discussion as to wether how far we want to stretch our ethics and morals into providing what is good for all parties. Without materialism, or ,perhaps a bigger issue here, kapitalism we would not have to have this conflict. We need to meet somewhere in the middle. Yet, Western society does not want to give in and give up their materialistic feelings to do so. Which means, once more, that the Western society is happy and the rest not.

The Western society, though, is facing more or less a same conflict with the world's oil. The prices are increasing to staggering ammounts and finally the Western society is starting to pull on the shortest end of something.

PS: Happy to see this discussion still going!
 
I agree with you.:flower: I hear that in many cases, a lot of little kids go blind in India and Pakistan weaving carpets to scrunge out a living, and the foreign importer would have ensured that his factory would avoid that extreme exploitation, even though yes, it would have meant using child labour. It's a horrible fact, but these child workers probably are the breadwinners of their families, and they need to bring in money to support their ailing parents or younger siblings. It's either back-breaking work or starving, begging and prostituting in the streets. I went to India recently, and I don't care that it is notionally a democracy - it's impossible to watch whole swarths of withering people, including many little kids and babies, living right next to the dusty roads with nothing but a battered pot and plastic sheets to shield them from 44C heat, while Mercedeses and Lexus zoomed by. I'm sure many simply died away everyday. :sick: A skinny little boy no older than 4 ripped off his shirt to wipe the windows of the car I was in, with an expression of pain on his face I still can't get out of my head. I've been to China and seen extreme poverty, I thought it'd be only slightly worse, but I was really shocked. I can't even imagine having the stomach to face Africa, with its millions starving to death.:shock:

I think if it took sweatshops to get the Chinese out of this, so be it. I can't expect the rich in the world to suddenly develop a conscience and start spending $billions to invest in the 3rd world (from which they would undoubtedly reap very good returns) instead of blowing it all on weapons, wars and creating more misery, it just won't happen. So, if they will invest in sweatshops out of pure selfish greed, that's fine, as long as that helps alleviate this extreme, inhumane poverty they turn a blind eye to, anyways. :cry:
 
You know, I was thinking, why aren't there FairTrade (for coffee growers) type fashion/clothing companies that invest in 3rd world labour without the extreme exploitation, though wages are low, and even feature the stories of their workers on each garment? I'm sure that would sell! :P
 
Zazie said:
You know, I was thinking, why aren't there FairTrade (for coffee growers) type fashion/clothing companies that invest in 3rd world labour without the extreme exploitation, though wages are low, and even feature the stories of their workers on each garment? I'm sure that would sell! :P

Well, Bono is trying to do that with Edun.
 
I know Bono is cheesy, but I'd give him credit for that. :smile: Are the clothes any good?
 
Wasn't that what Maharishi did/does with their manufacturing? Took it to poorer countries but paid them a western rate? Don't know too much about it...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,542
Messages
15,188,536
Members
86,435
Latest member
somethingswrong
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->