The Row - The All-Things The Row Thread | Page 151 | the Fashion Spot
  • Voting for the 2025 theFashionSpot Awards has now closed. Thank you for your participation.

The Row - The All-Things The Row Thread

So what actually happened? Because I read the "Open Letter" and it doesn't really say much?

You tried to control me, to dictate my work, to downplay what I’d built, and all the while, you profited from my efforts. But the hardest part was that you became increasingly (and unforgivably) rude. Your charm was beguiling and performative. A supple, leather-gloved kind of control.
neelamahooja.substack.com/

Does anyone have access to "The Story Behind the Open Letter", which goes more in depth into what happened?
 

The Shifting Power Balance Between Influencers and Brands​

Neelam Ahooja’s open letter to The Row highlights how influencers are becoming less fearful of speaking out against the brands they work with.

therow.jpeg

By DIANA PEARL / 31 October 2025

There’s no question — influencers love The Row.

They wait in line for hours to attend its annual sample sale, excitedly unbox their new Margaux bags on TikTok and explain to their followers why its minimalist wares are worth the sky-high price tags.

But according to Neelam Ahooja, that affection is one-sided. The content creator has spent her entire online career singing the brand’s praises, from styling the many pieces in her collection to breaking down its most popular products on YouTube. She once posted a 10-minute-long video focused exclusively on the Margaux’s handles.

This week, however, Ahooja’s tone shifted. In an open letter to the brand on Substack titled “we need to break up” and an even lengthier follow-up, she detailed her many grievances with The Row. Among her claims: that the company killed a Wall Street Journal story about Ahooja’s love for the brand, scolded her for posting about the brand’s annual sample sale and chastised her for posting affiliate links to wholesalers. A spokesperson for The Row didn’t respond to a request for comment.

“They don’t want influencers who spread the word? We helped put The Row on the map,” she wrote. “We spent our hard-earned money and then influenced thousands of others who also invested in the brand. What of their loyalty to those who supported them from the beginning?”

Not so long ago, it would have been hard to imagine an influencer speaking out publicly against a luxury brand. Though Ahooja never had a formal, paid relationship with The Row, the brand is the foundation of her online identity — “The Row collector” is the first line of her Instagram bio. She said in her follow-up post she didn’t speak out before now in hopes of maintaining an amicable relationship with the brand as a client.

Ahooja isn’t the only creator who’s speaking out. Creator Samyra Miller, for instance, has publicly criticised Athleta for pulling back on extended sizing, while Wisdom Kaye slammed Miu Miu after he spent $18,000 with the brand only to have two items break while unboxing. Lydia Millen, whose online identity is aligned with her robust collection of Hermès bags, announced earlier this year her intent to sell them.

Something has changed in the relationship between influencers and brands. For most of the last decade, many brands held influencers at arm’s length (some still do) even as they relied on them to promote their products. Creators had little choice but to accept this arrangement, as sponsored content deals were how they made up the bulk of their income. Fail to toe the line, and there were plenty of others eager to take your seat at the next show.

But the balance of power is shifting.

In recent years, creators have made major strides in diversifying their income beyond brand deals. Substack, Patreon and other platforms make it easier to sell subscriptions to followers. Affiliate marketing is booming; influencers receive commission when a follower makes a purchase after clicking one of those links, with or without the brand’s approval.

Influencers are realising that the most important group to keep happy isn’t the marketing managers who can hand them paid content deals, but their followers. Building trust with that community is paramount. Many are finding the best way to do that isn’t with an endless stream of #ads, but in publicly sharing frustrations with a brand, or being open about the behind-the-scenes aspects of running a content creation business.

Complaining about luxury brands is also trendy. In a shaky economic environment, luxury’s high prices feel out of touch to the average TikTok user, who is also seeking validation that the product’s quality is not “worth” the price. Finding the perfect copy — or in TikTok speak, dupe — of a designer bag is no longer chastised, but celebrated. When creators speak out against a brand, audiences are more primed to side with the influencer they trust over a faceless company.

Still, there’s little danger of the relationship between brands and creators fully breaking down. While there’s more appetite than there used to be for calling out luxury’s failures, people are equally, if not more, interested in day-in-the-life recaps, travel vlogs and shopping hauls. That lifestyle doesn’t pair well with relentless negativity, and it’s easier to generate content from a trip to Paris when it includes tickets to shows, showroom visits and gifted products.

What brands need to recognise is that it’s cheaper, and more effective, to earn an influencer’s endorsement than to try to pay or bully them into saying nice things on Instagram or TikTok. As Ahooja showed, creators can walk away from the relationship, even when it goes back a decade or more. If the 300-plus, overwhelmingly positive comments under her open letter are any indication, they may even be rewarded for it.
BOF
 
Sounds like a lot of publicity for someone with 20k followers on youtube..

I'll admit I'm feeling mild schadenfreude over someone stanning a celebrity line and getting served with celebrity PR pettiness lol. But.. fear some of these influencers! they'll reach out like 'can we do a collab? 🥺' and.. bad if you say yes, ire at its finest if you say no.
 
She based her entire personality on a brand and spent her money to dress exactly like their lookbooks. She has absolutely zero sense of self or individuality. Nor does she even have taste or style because she is only ever wearing what a brand has already decided for her. She was nothing more than a self-appointed wannabe-brand-ambassador.

She believed her brand loyalty and financial investments would gain her greater and closer access to the brand. Except, The Row never owed her anything she felt she was ever entitled to. Did she just learn what capitalism is?

She wanted to get The Row’s attention but got none so she’s breaking up this one-sided relationship. Maybe she needs a new hobby that doesn’t cost her tens of thousands of dollars to look like she shops at Uniqlo.
 
Sounds like a lot of publicity for someone with 20k followers on youtube..

I'll admit I'm feeling mild schadenfreude over someone stanning a celebrity line and getting served with celebrity PR pettiness lol. But.. fear some of these influencers! they'll reach out like 'can we do a collab? 🥺' and.. bad if you say yes, ire at its finest if you say no.
to be fair on ig she has 205K and most of these fashion buying reviewers have smaller following on youtube its not as fast and easy to replicate your following into long format etc this is not an abnormal case even influencer that go to shows like even hermes have less followers than her on iG.

example how hard youtube is to build following naomi 15.7M followers ig versus 544k youtube followers post once in few months verus influencer tamara 2M Followers ig 485K followers on youtube post 3x per week.

its just what the brand likes to invite at given moments and more often they are more in to reach of the smaller influencers as reach on ig can be 10x or100x than your followers count. and to diversify with in content creators land.

the ig algorithm favors forwarded/shared content and than likes etc etc

any ways the funny thing is she is helping the row to be more notorious and have this not easy to access aura so its working for The Row lol
 
"...A supple, leather-gloved kind of control" sounds to me like a glowing review.
totally get why they don't want the association tbh.
 
The row doesn’t need these basic people. Just do good clothes and stay unreachable. The worst thing for them is publicity from these nobodies. I applaud their strategy, it’s different than other houses, fits their desire for privacy. This brand is not for me and not for everybody. Let it be selective, elitist and pretentious.
 
Maybe I should try to get on SM (and risk my professional career at the same time lol) and pull a similar stunt on NG.
The perks i officially get as a client are not interesting enough. At the same time being an influencer to receive a monogram Neverfull…Hmm.
I’ll only post my NG for Balenciaga/Vuitton outfits. Then I’ll say that I put Louis Vuitton RTW on the map…
And then when things won’t go my way, I’ll flip the script and throw a tirade against capitalism, consumerism and luxury because everybody hates Bernard Arnault anyway (hopefully keeping my relation with NG intact in case he launch his own brand).

Is that a good plan? 😂
 

PUCK NEWS​

Has TikTok Ruined The Row’s Sample Sale?​

Over the past few years, The Row’s sample sale in New York has somehow become a cultural event worthy of documentation on dozens—hundreds, thousands?—of TikToks.
The fervor really started at the October 2021 edition of the sample sale, when the brand released tons of leftover goods from Barneys New York, which liquidated right before the pandemic.

Four years later, The Row is way more popular and even better known among younger consumers, and lines are snaking around the block. (This month, some discount hunters slept overnight in makeshift tents.)

Sample sales are now part of the fashion ecosystem for many, if not most, brands, and it’s easy to argue that all the attention is great for The Row.
But for a brand so consumed with control that it prohibited taking photos at recent runway shows, TikTokification has its downsides, too.

The crush of buyers resulted in plenty of foreseeable grievances on Substack and Instagram: not enough accessible sizing, lack of good stuff after the V.I.P. first day, etcetera.
Sure, it’s impossible to produce exactly the right amount of inventory, and brands need to offload it somehow.

But perhaps The Row should take a page out of Hermès’s or Prada’s playbooks, and treat any necessary sell-offs as invite-only events, with scheduled time slots. —Sarah Shapiro

BS puck notes again : hermes has also public access sales days, prada has plenty outlets around the world and even produce items for outlets only.
 
I'm sorry, but the flood of tiktok hauls from this sample sale was just too embarrassing to watch. Imagine queueing for hours just to get plain t-shirts and pants, and gaslighting everyone, including yourself, into thinking it was worth the effort. Where's the hyperexclusive luxury The Row wants to capitalise on?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,580
Messages
15,308,158
Members
89,610
Latest member
charail24
Back
Top