Thom Browne F/W 07.08 NYC | the Fashion Spot

Thom Browne F/W 07.08 NYC

Dustcakeboy

Active Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
0
I adore his utter individuality and sheer geekiness!

February 5, 2007
The first outfit was announced by the swell of the fourth movement of Mahler's Fifth Symphony, a piece of music that would tug at the heartstrings of anyone who was, say, swept away by Visconti's Death in Venice at an impressionable age. And that's really the only kind of age that interests Thom Browne: the moment when one's sense of one's own difference from everyone else finally throws caution to the wind and shoots off on an intensely personal trajectory. "I had fun," the designer announced cheerily, after a show that confounded the essential constructs of modern menswear (let alone American sportswear).

His work is so utterly sui generis that one is compelled to decompress from one's standard outlook and marvel at the force of will that proposes a passementerie shorts suit (and we do mean short) with button-down, thigh-high socks as a viable alternative to a man's quotidian garb. "Propose" really is the operative word, because the show was, as ever, a smorgasbord of suggestions on Browne's part, almost any one of which could be adapted for a customer not quite ready for a full-scale plunge into Thomworld.

The collection's key jacket shape was derived from the Norfolk, originally a nineteenth-century hunting style, here shrunken and exaggerated till it had an almost Empire line. The same ambiguously transformative impulse married tunic and parka (tunka?) in a silvery, stiffened A-line poncho that the model doffed to reveal a fitted three-piece suit in the same fabric. Dangling suspenders only served to emphasize the droog-y subtext. It's this interplay of outré associations that gives Browne's work its power. Watching old movies on a trip to Japan got him thinking about male geishas (he originally wanted his models to be completely hobbled when they moved). And this is the designer who is now working in the belly of the Brooks Brothers beast. It's simply not possible for menswear to ever be the same again.

— Tim Blanks

Source of review and all pix: Men.Style.com

95090181ae9.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ugh. I seriously hate Tim Blanks.
His work is so utterly sui generis that one is compelled to decompress from one's standard outlook and marvel at the force of will that proposes a passementerie shorts suit (and we do mean short) with button-down, thigh-high socks as a viable alternative to a man's quotidian garb.
How pretentious can that man be!? And that's just one sentence!


Anyway, as nice as Browne's design may be, as a whole it is just way to GQ. And there's too many gimmicks. (The short-shorts, the bridal train...)
 
I like the short pullover coats. If it didnt cost 5k I would consider it.

I really do hate the gimmicks though, god. BTW, Tim Blanks, that's his MO. He's prententious to make himself seem interesting/knowledgeable about fashion, he has no clue or style.
 
more from thom browne, what do you boys think of these looks?

00040m.jpg

00130m.jpg

00150m.jpg

00160m.jpg

00300m.jpg


men.style.com
 
Why do I love the look of the shorts and socks? It seems wrong, but I think that is so fresh for some reason! ^_^
 
The thing is...Half of this he already produces. Why does he even have a show? It's always the same every season.
 
Diorling said:
I like the short pullover coats. If it didnt cost 5k I would consider it.

I really do hate the gimmicks though, god. BTW, Tim Blanks, that's his MO. He's prententious to make himself seem interesting/knowledgeable about fashion, he has no clue or style.

I know!! It's VERY VERY annoying. Like we should all write letters to Condenast about it. Many people are smart, but I dont have time to read and decrypt such reviews or analyze every allusion he makes. I dont see why he cannot write in a simpler way so more people can understand him...:angry:
 
i might have loved a few individual pieces...but i never want to see anyone wearing ony of those!!!!
 
I hate Thom Browne. His whole fetishy/necro-historical outifts seriously creep me out.

The flood pants, stockings, too short shorts, loafers with no socks,... they look like adolescent boys in little boys clothing...it's like arrested development disorder, it's totally sexual and creepy! I am only one who sees that?!

Also just throwing ski masks on the models is such a lame gag; and I hate that magazines write about him as if he's doing something new when his whole line is just so retro and costume-y.
 
I totally agree. I was reading his reviews for the shows and they're utter crap. the writing is horrible not to mention the critiques.




I really do hate the gimmicks though, god. BTW, Tim Blanks, that's his MO. He's prententious to make himself seem interesting/knowledgeable about fashion, he has no clue or style.[/quote]
 
The only thing I like are the socks, but they're completely unwearable, the only way to wear them would be w/ shorts and then you're bordering on leggings...Controversial

Thom Browne is so contrived, all he does is take womenswear and put it on men...there is NOTHING to it, it's not hard to put a mink stole on a man, what is hard is making it look good. He takes the easy route.
 
Diorling said:
The only thing I like are the socks, but they're completely unwearable, the only way to wear them would be w/ shorts and then you're bordering on leggings...Controversial

Thom Browne is so contrived, all he does is take womenswear and put it on men...there is NOTHING to it, it's not hard to put a mink stole on a man, what is hard is making it look good. He takes the easy route.
These socks sure look good on the runway..
But..I dont know..Are men really gonna wear them in real life??
 
^ HELL NO. It'll end up 70 off at Bergdorfs (like it is right now) and still noone will touch it.

If they're not exorbantly expensive I might get a pair and see how they work out, might be cool w/ shorts and loafers in the summer, worn slouchy.

I think Thom has kind of...placed himself awkwardly. First, his clothes are easily the most expensive mens RTW that Ive ever come across. Second, his clothes aren't consumeable enough to be that expensive, I can (and do) justify Brioni and Kiton, for godsake, Dior is like H&M in comparison. It's just not worth the price...
 
To say there are too many gimmicks is an understatement.
If one were to lengthen those pants, and take away the feminine pieces, you end up with a rather bland collection, much like the Brooks Bros collection he works on.
I wouldn't expect those kind of jokes from such a serious contender.
Foolish.
 
Very well made clothes, always a step forward in styling while keeping very individual. Doesn't he already have a stong clientele ? I think he is in that positinion where people will follow him and not the other way around. Always had a good feeling about him.
 
i have yet to see anyone wearing thom brown in person- or even looking at it at store- even heavily reduced no- one buys- instant fashion victim- if i ever succumbed to the look i'd just take a pair of scissors to an old suits trouser leg- £3K saved!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
216,532
Messages
15,342,894
Members
90,211
Latest member
randorando
Back
Top