US Harper's Bazaar November 2016 : Gwyneth Paltrow by Alexi Lubomirski

zzzyao76

Active Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
4,748
Reaction score
88

harpersbazaar


Styled by Joanna Hillman


harpersbazaar

Interview
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't like the cover but the editorial is quite nice... Why not use the first photo from the editorial as a cover? it is stunning!
 
Was just wondering how it's interesting she isn't on all the covers this year, and here she is. I feel like the cover would work better if she didn't smile, and that shot with all her previous Bazaar covers is fantastic, the couple's faces are brilliant!:lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ha, I like this! Not very Alexi at all however?

The first shot will be the newsstand cover I'm sure.
 
Was just wondering how it's interesting she isn't on all the covers this year, and here she is. I feel like the cover would work better if she didn't smile, and that shot with all her previous Bazaar covers is fantastic, the couple's faces are brilliant!:lol:

Indeed!! :lol: So it's 7 covers altogether so far.

I also think the first shot will end up the newsstand cover, although with a white backdrop. The subscriber's one looks so budget, like an advertisement for Claire's. Don't know how this magazine can get away with running such editorials month after month.
 
She looks a bit 'lifted' around the eyes, but otherwise, I love the editorial, and I hope the 'black' shot turns out to be the cover of something, whether it's newsstand or subscribers.
 
I love the attitude of the editorial. BUT, why in that setting? Weird.
 
The cover looks stiff and awkward. I'm assuming the mask is photoshopped on? Either way, it looks photoshopped and badly so. Very fake.

That first image from the editorial would've made for an amazing cover though.
 
The newsstand cover is the same shot just with more text. A real shame too, because the first shot of Gwyneth is fabulous! :heart:

harpers_bazaar_november_ns_cover1.jpg


pagesix.com
 
She's been on atleast three more covers. Once under Tilberis, September 2005, and a really Pink one by Lindbergh. Idk how I remover this given that one of them have been very memorable by either way, 10! Is way way way way too many!
 
I don't get that cover, it's like seeing a celebrity dress up as a female Zorro.
 
What happened to having models on covers?
 
As she prepares to launch her latest endeavor under her all-encompassing Goop umbrella—a clothing line named, fittingly, goop Label.

She's promoting Goop.

She's also Gwyneth Paltrow. Promoting something isn't a requirement of her landing a cover, it's not massively hindered her appearances before.
 
Are they serious with that mask for the cover?? It looks so ill-fitting. These people are clueless.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,901
Messages
15,242,155
Members
87,852
Latest member
oberoiman
Back
Top