Deleted member 116957
New/Inactive Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 13,771
- Reaction score
- 15,814
The cover's ok, nothing really special. I don't care for Kristen, but I am still glad they are putting different people on their covers.
Wow..this is an all time low for them. Can't believe they put her on the cover. I'm speechless. Was hoping it was all a bad rumor.
why?. I'm not a fan either but I'm really curious why some are finding it hard to cope with this cover?, I mean, she's an actress.. she's everywhere, she has a slightly distinctive red-carpet style from what I've seen, she's allegedly dating a popular actor and has been featured in serious films (Twilight Saga excluded).. add to this the fact that this is US Vogue.. gone are the days when US Vogue only featured remarkable actresses or successful faces of the modeling industry, I really don't see how Kristen Stewart somehow lowers this more than a cover featuring Jennifer Aniston (who at one point had similar credentials to Kristen and currently plays only shadow of that), or Sienna Miller (who only had the popular boyfriend and wardrobe on her side).. or worse, Melanie Knauss.. who had none of that and actually portrayed more the pre-historic woman that married for money, was beautiful and didn't matter whether she had a brain or not.
I really don't see how Kristen Stewart somehow lowers this more than a cover featuring Jennifer Aniston (who at one point had similar credentials to Kristen and currently plays only shadow of that), or Sienna Miller (who only had the popular boyfriend and wardrobe on her side).. or worse, Melanie Knauss..

Plus what she's wearing on the cover looks good on her. Although I'm a bit bothered with the hairstyle. 
