Share with us... Your Best & Worst Collections of S/S 2025
As much as I appreciate the effort, I don't find comfort in the fact that they're profiting off of her. Unless this is for free, my stance remains the same as that of her O Magazine cover.
As much as I appreciate the effort, I don't find comfort in the fact that they're profiting off of her. Unless this is for free, my stance remains the same as that of her O Magazine cover.
The cover as a whole looks very unfinished, maybe it's all the negative space. And the actual artwork looks very much like the Vector illustrations you see in every wannabe hipster magazine or website right now.
.
Negative space is Sherald's style - see her Michelle Obama Portrait.
I love this painting and i think it is very clever of Vogue and VF to commission these artists. Perhaps they pay upfront for them, secure ownership and can flip them years later at auction for millions more than they paid the artist. In the meantime they can use them as collateral in financial transactions.
Sherald and John Currin are artists of significant cultural value. It's not unimaginable to think that Currin's painting of Jennifer Lawrence that Vogue commissioned could go for 4 millions dollars or more.
Personally I don't see it as exploration, I see more as a celebration. So much has been said about her death (and the ones who murdered her), but it's also important to celebrate her life, which is what it looks like they'll be doing. With Ta-Nehisi being the guest editor, I'm confident it was done tastefully and thoughtfully.
Even if it’s done with taste, we all know that people on social media don’t read magazines, don’t buy magazines and surely don’t even flip the pages of a magazine at their local mall or whatever...Personally I don't see it as exploration, I see more as a celebration. So much has been said about her death (and the ones who murdered her), but it's also important to celebrate her life, which is what it looks like they'll be doing. With Ta-Nehisi being the guest editor, I'm confident it was done tastefully and thoughtfully.
Even if it’s done with taste, we all know that people on social media don’t read magazines, don’t buy magazines and surely don’t even flip the pages of a magazine at their local mall or whatever...
Most of the opinions are based on assumptions. Are they going to see beyond that? Beyond this cover?
But it’s not an illustration and it isn’t digital art. It’s an actual painting.Totally agree with Benn, I don't think that the illustration is very good, anyone who's dabbled in digital art will tell you this lacks contrast, her body looks a bit flat because the shading is too timid...commendable effort to bring awareness to the injustices she suffered but I agree that it clashes with Vanity Fair's identity as the go to place for high gossip and frivolous fodder.