Vogue Australia October 2016 : Kendall Jenner by Patrick Demarchelier | the Fashion Spot
  • Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Vogue Australia October 2016 : Kendall Jenner by Patrick Demarchelier

ChicSaks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
404
Reaction score
302
ccd4553ff2d94f0221c60b6075f1e5df


a88995cfafa72fb653db47b739cb2457


5120dec929455fb7241d65a39ce84048


dailytelegraph au
 
Tragic. Might look better with good quality, at least she's making a different face. LOL!
 
Oh my, they hit an all time low with this.
 
Oh wow... wow... this is not good. Not sure if it's the quality of the image or did they paste her face into a different shot?

Vogue Australia is free falling for me. Haven't been completely wowed by a cover from them this year.

That LAYOUT needs to go. It's dated. It's stiff. It's not glamorous. And even Cosmo has a better layout than this. It has to go.

Sorry, but this could pass as a Vogue India cover from the colors to the gimmick.
 
I don't know what's worse... having Kendall on another cover? This horrible styling? The hair? The set?
 
She is getting better, the two shot previews are decent, and i can't say much about the cover since its not in full, and is such bad quality, but it looks too vivid, although she looks nice.
 
everything is horrible. I wish they gave a cover to Ajak Deng.
 
looks nothing like vogue australia, i kind of like the picture in the burberry dress though. might have made a better cover.
 
I don't know what's worse... having Kendall on another cover? This horrible styling? The hair? The set?

Ditto ahaha I used to have such a high respect for Vogue Australia but THIS THISSSS is not high fashion and they have lost me on this one.
 
OH. MY. GOD. I had so much respect for Christine Centenera (even when Kim was on the cover twice) until this came out. How could they approve this!?!?!?
 
This is really sad because her American vogue and VJ covers were good. It does not even look like her on the cover, the photoshop is hideous. Her face appears puffy, the wig is horrible. I like the two editorial pics in the preview but yeah this is her worse cover this year for sure.
 
What an eyesore! Vogue Australia has been so tragic lately.
 
Full cover
Crn1SGcWEAA44kO.jpg:large


(twitter vogue au)

23122-1.jpg


23123-1.jpg


(vogue.com.au)

the color is a mess....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The dress is ugly. The coat/two coats (is it one or two?) she's wearing look like two skinned muppets.

I like that she's doing something different with her face but her serenity doesn't go with the rock n roll bohemia headline. I'd rather see her posed like this in a flattering evening gown (with more face). I do like their 'Millennial Dollar Baby' line, incidentally. I always appreciate a good play on words. That said, Kendall is one of the least bohemian models out there. I'm not convinced. She looks like a kid playing dress ups. Sorry Kendall.

Also this doesn't feel like a Spring cover to me.

EDIT: I like the two ed shots. Why oh why did they put such an ugly outfit on the cover?? All the access to the most beautiful clothes in the world, and that dress is on the cover?? If I found it in a thrift shop I'd buy it if it was under $30, and happily wear it to retro parties. Those colours suit NO ONE!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Australia couldn't keep her out? Aren't the Kardashians an invasive species
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,516
Messages
15,265,031
Members
88,581
Latest member
coolkittyyaddle
Back
Top