Vogue Netherlands April 2017 : Doutzen Kroes & Lara Stone by Mario Testino | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot

Vogue Netherlands April 2017 : Doutzen Kroes & Lara Stone by Mario Testino

Downtown
Photographer:
Mario Testino
Stylist: Paul Cavaco
Make-Up: Val Garland
Hair: Christiaan


jedroot.com
 
I'm happy to see what Testino did for this issue

Btw- Dutch people don't care about nudity at all .. it's normal
 
Not if you put it like this of course, but an important thing to keep in mind is that 'non-functional nudity' is a huge part of Dutch visual culture. Dating back to the Dutch cinematic era of the sixties and seventies or female artist Phil Bloom appearing fully nude on the Dutch version of tv's PBS back in 1967, etcetera etcetera.

Yeah the Dutch are great at this: the commodification of the female body. Man I really don't understand how people can have this much cognitive dissonance.

I'm all for being naked and happy. But this simply screams male voyeurism and the explanations they give "I'm so myself" "Sisterly love"

Get. The. F. Out.

:angry:
 
Vogue Netherlands (I think it's for April)
The Truth

Photographer: Mario Testino
Model: Luna Bijl
Stylist: Joe McKenna
Make-up: Val Garland
Hair: Christiaan

large-1488993671-99b5c56cd18d1ab7f9b1780605dee72c.jpg

large-1488993672-6e8b98b1a1840993e46db49481e09afc.jpg

premier model management
 
Dutch people are just relaxed about nudity
No one complaining about seeing nudity


instagram luisfabianoteixeira
 
Yeah the Dutch are great at this: the commodification of the female body. Man I really don't understand how people can have this much cognitive dissonance.

I'm all for being naked and happy. But this simply screams male voyeurism and the explanations they give "I'm so myself" "Sisterly love"

Get. The. F. Out.

:angry:

Jeez .... Hold on to your panties girl, hardly any male voyeur will buy this mag. Your reaction might be genuine but save it for a socio political platform not a for a 'fashion'magazine that's supposed to appeal to female clientele and their gay friends. Calm down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jeez .... Hold on to your panties girl, hardly any male voyeur will buy this mag. Your reaction might be genuine but save it for a socio political platform not a for a 'fashion'magazine that's supposed to appeal to female clientele and their gay friends. Calm down.


Everything. Is. Socio. Political.

There is no more denying that.
 
Jeez .... Hold on to your panties girl, hardly any male voyeur will buy this mag. Your reaction might be genuine but save it for a socio political platform not a for a 'fashion'magazine that's supposed to appeal to female clientele and their gay friends. Calm down.

The funny thing is that you mentioned that this is a "'fashion'magazine that's supposed to appeal to female clientele and their gay friends" and yet the comment that you replied to was posted by a woman.
 
I don't see your point, ofcourse not everyone is appealed by this cover. That goes for every magazine.

Vitamin W isn't wrong though. Voyeurism goes much further then this. There is nothing sexual going on this cover and you hardly can see anything. I understand we all live in different country's, have different standards, different cultures. But for Dutch standards this isn't shocking at all. I only saw some Dutch shortcutted hair housewifes complaining. Not because the nudity was shocking or the pose, they find it more suited for adultmagazines.

As part Dutchie, i love it. Hopefully we see Luna featured more often in the magazine :)
 
The funny thing is that you mentioned that this is a "'fashion'magazine that's supposed to appeal to female clientele and their gay friends" and yet the comment that you replied to was posted by a woman.

So what? Are we now entering gender appropriation territory? I don't even care about this cover or magazine but I do care about her accusation.
Again, she is entitled to her opinion BUT the intention of the magazine cover, made by aforementioned demographics is NOT to satisfy the male voyeuristic gaze. Its to attract attention and sell stuff that we don't need. Stating that an entire population is great at objectifying females, because their national vogue fronts nudity, is simply ignorant. Nudity is all over fashion magazines, and especially Northern European countries simply have less issues with nudity in general. If you really want to make an emancipatory difference, a fashion forum is the dumbest pace to start. Women, and men mind you, are constantly objectified in this medium. Judging an entire nation because of it is objectifying in itself. Pot, kettle, black.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vogue Netherlands (I think it's for April)
The Truth

Photographer: Mario Testino
Model: Luna Bijl
Stylist: Joe McKenna
Make-up: Val Garland
Hair: Christiaan

The full editorial!

The Truth

Photographer: Mario Testino
Models: Luna Bijl, Roos Abels, Estella Boersma, Julia Hoomans, Marjan Jonkman and the two last girls ? (please help, I know who they are but I just can't remember their name)
Stylist: Joe McKenna
Make-up: Val Garland
Hair: Christiaan

Mario-Testino-for-Vogue-Netherlands-April-2017-1.jpg

Mario-Testino-for-Vogue-Netherlands-April-2017-2.jpg

Mario-Testino-for-Vogue-Netherlands-April-2017-3.jpg

Mario-Testino-for-Vogue-Netherlands-April-2017-4.jpg

Mario-Testino-for-Vogue-Netherlands-April-2017-5.jpg
Spara
fattongue
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The full editorial!

The Truth

Photographer: Mario Testino
Models: Luna Bijl, Roos Abels, Estella Boersma, Julia Hoomans, Marjan Jonkman and the last girl ? (please help, I know who she is but I just can't remember her name)

fattongue

Luna Bijl, Marjan Jonkman, Estella Boersma, Roos Abels, Kiki Willems, Jessie Bloemendaal, Julie Hoomans.
 
Vera van Erp is also part of that ed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,474
Messages
15,263,119
Members
88,499
Latest member
cristianhunter
Back
Top