W March 2010 : Megan Fox by Craig McDean

[Luxx]

Meghan takes such great pictures, whether you love her or hate her she's just so photogenic.

 

[LUXXX]

It is a beautiful cover, I just hope she doesn't give another cringe-wrothy interview. I believe next month's cover will be Jen Aniston and Gerard Butler.

 

[Carla-A]

Megan looks beautiful on the cover, I agree. Nevertheless, isn't it just too much ? I mean, it's too flawless, and imo, a cover is supposed to offer more : a shot some kind of innovative and powerful, and not something beautiful... and plain.

 

[IAmLordZen]

I rarely see Megan not in her bombshell, sultry, "get me boys" look. This is really good! I love what I see and the eds look promising.

 

[TheCheekyCritic]

I think my only real complaint about the cover shot is that they still went for a bit of boob, when they could've chosen not to. Megan's assets are already so famous by now that I think this would've been more interesting without the breast peek-a-boo. You can argue all you want that the focus is on her face, but if you follow the trail of her bare skin, you nevertheless end up at the boob, and therefore as it is now, the attempt at portraying Fox, the beauty, feels a little half-hearted.

I believe next month's cover will be Jen Aniston and Gerard Butler.

Oh dear God, no. Thankfully, I'm not a subscriber or else I'd have to put that straight up for auction on eBay.

 

[afterrhours]

her eyes look really pretty but overall i don't find it a very appealing cover

 

[liberty33r1b]

ordinary cover, i've clearly seen better!

 

[_incognito]

Stunning.

 

[Magnus]

celebrity-gossip.net

 

[VogueGirl8910]

I hate her, but nice cover.

 

[clo]

I don't particularly like Megan Fox and I think she's a really bad actress but I have to say that she looks extremely beautiful on this cover. She is a very beautiful woman but she always tends to look sultry and trashy. Here she looks exceptional.

 

[Northern Star]

Well if you are determined to put another celeb on the cover of you're mag, you cannot go wrong with Megan Fox.
Also tone down her vampish image and this is the result...an absolutely stunning and very appealing cover.
Also nice to see that W has more than 1 editorial in this issue Bravo for them to splash out and actually prove that are still a 'fashion mag'.

 

[cottonmouth13]

According to the seller from eBay who is selling this issue, Liya Kebede, Shalom Harlow, Natasa Vojnovic & Edita Vilkeviciute are also featured in this issue.

 

[JordanB]

Well if you are determined to put another celeb on the cover of you're mag, you cannot go wrong with Megan Fox.
Also tone down her vampish image and this is the result...an absolutely stunning and very appealing cover.
Also nice to see that W has more than 1 editorial in this issue Bravo for them to splash out and actually prove that are still a 'fashion mag'.

couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[clocked]

NOOO...get off the cover of the only mag i subscribe to, megan! SO BORING

 

[Omnis]

there is bruce weber editorial too and models line -up ( i bet, for sorrenti editorial anna de rejk, freja beha, natasa vojnovic, guinevere van seenus, patricia van der vliet, iselin steiro, mirte maas, heidi mount, edita, liya kebede, sigrid agren, lindsey scott, christophe de menil

Where did you find this model line-up, Alien Sex Friend? I don't think that Iselin is a part of the Sorrenti editorial, because the Women Management blog posted the Natasa photo from that editorial and no Iselin. They would have posted both Natasa and Iselin if they both were in it, I presume?

Perhaps Iselin has another editorial if you are certain that she is in this issue?

 

[mikel]

According to the seller from eBay who is selling this issue, Liya Kebede, Shalom Harlow, Natasa Vojnovic & Edita Vilkeviciute are also featured in this issue.

I hope that Shalom is in an indication of a I&V ed.

 

[Alien Sex Friend]

Where did you find this model line-up, Alien Sex Friend? I don't think that Iselin is a part of the Sorrenti editorial, because the Women Management blog posted the Natasa photo from that editorial and no Iselin. They would have posted both Natasa and Iselin if they both were in it, I presume?

Perhaps Iselin has another editorial if you are certain that she is in this issue?

ebay

 

[SusanSuperstar]

that cover is stunning

 

[MON]

Excited for Megan's spread. I hope it lives up to the cover. 200+ PAGES still makes me want to cry