So fun to see this thread active again! I sent Pam (the OP) a PM back when she started the thread and told her my opinion/experience. She is very gracious.
Let me start by stating that I fully see and understand how it's "unfair" to buy replicas...it IS an illegal copy of a luxury item. From that perspective, replicas are wrong. However, replicas still pay homage to authentic and in their way, advertise for the authentics.
Think about it...if a chic, well dressed woman is carrying a mono LV bag with a nice patina and 9 out of 10 people who see her think "She's lovely, and I LOVE that bag...." THAT is business for LV. Because MOST people will assume her bag is authentic, whether it is or not. She's elegant and carries herself well, her bag doesn't scream fake, therefore it's authentic and I want that bag too.
The replica industry isn't exactly ripping off companies in the way most people portray it to... Think about when someone invents something....this invention was their baby...they worked on it for years...but as soon as it's released to the masses, someone somewhere will be figuring out how to make one almost exactly like it, only cheaper. Then the original has to defend it's title as best with lines like "don't be fooled by imitators!" Or "the original is still the best!". It seems unfair...but that's business.
There is a hair product line called Wen. It was developed by a celeb stylist blah blah blah. They paid some F list celebs to endorse it, you get extras free for calling in the next 10 minutes, etc. Well, the whole thing is about $80. I was interested in the main product so I did some research and read tons of reviews. Turns out there's a brand at Sally's called Hair One. It's the same thing for only $11.99. It's a fantastic product. I will never buy Wen. Now, am I wrong for wanting the better deal or is the maker of Wen wrong for charging so much?
Maybe neither of us are wrong....and here's the thing that I NEVER hear brought up regarding the luxury industry:
You AREN'T paying 3k for the quality of the bag!!!!!! You're paying for the A list celebrity in their ads who has a multi million dollar contract. You're paying for their rent space on Rodeo drive and all the other ritzy locales....you're paying for decor, associate's salaries and to line the pockets of the people who own these companies. Finally, somewhere in those masses of dollars you just plunked down (or, in many cases, in the plastic you handed over and will be paying off for months) you pay for the bag itself. The leather, stitching, hardware...the label. The bag you're getting is NOT worth the price you're paying. It can't be, otherwise there would be no profit for the company.
It's a BUSINESS and it's about a PROFIT. Just like anything else.
They aren't handmade. Only Hermes hand makes their bags. Only Hermes is a true luxury brand anymore.
I'm fully supportive of people who only buy authentic and truly believe in supporting the original designer....but don't buy in to the price being justified by the "quality and craftsmanship" because it just isn't true. And don't get on your high horse and lecture the little people about how we're ripping off an artist! A true artist is about their art, not about greed. Any "artist" who designs for LV is at least partially in it to make bank and they will. No one is hurting here. LV's prices continue to go up.
That's my take on replicas. I see both sides and understand both sides. Eventually I'll have an Hermes Birkin.... But knowing as much as I do now about the top grade replicas, there's no way I'd buy authentic canvas LV.....or pay $1500 for a Bal when my reps are genuine italian goatskin leather.
People used to be able to spot a fake "from a mile away" but it's not like that anymore. The pros over on tpf can't tell without looking at date codes. If those are the only way to distinguish the best reps from auth...why would I pay more?