Your Magazine Cover Predictions & Speculations for 2019

I very much hope to see some new or unexpected faces on the main covers this year. Olivia Coleman could be a possibility for Vogue UK, maybe even US? I know she wouldn't be the most obvious fashion choice, but there is a big chance she will walk away with the Oscar and she is also currently starring in Les Mis, very much loved and I think she will be a big star over the coming years.

I saw the name Michaela Coel mentioned in one of the above posts and they would be the absolute dream! Her covering Vogue UK would be a major YES. Cannot see it happening soon, but who knows. Hoping for Naomie Harris as well, we have been waiting so long, but I think 2020 would make more sense with the release of the new Bond.
 
Have adored Olivia’s work for years.. but I think she’s more HB UK subscriber’s only special collector’s cover than Vogue.
 
US Vogue:
February - Hailey Bieber
March - Brie Larson
April - Ariana Grande
May - Serena Williams
June - Yara Shahidi
July - Margot Robbie
August - Gigi and Bella Hadid
September - Rihanna
October - Nicole Kidman
November - Kristen Stewart
December - Emma Watson
 
One thing I can't see happening as much as it used to is the constant use of 90s supermodels, specifically the ones around - or beyond - the age of 50.

We might hope to be living in a world where boundaries are being challenged and changed, but let's face it, the fiftysomething women currently appearing on covers are either extremely well-preserved (Nicole, Elle, JLo) or airbrushed in a way their male peers aren't, if they're chosen at all.

However, older men will continue to turn up on the cover of Esquire etc with skin that looks like a map of a dry gullies in a desert landscape, and be applauded for their 'character'. Plus ça change.
 
US Vogue - Kerry Washington
 
Kerry Washington on Vogue would be great, but it seems like the ship may have sailed. If Anna didn't give her a cover during the run of "Scandal", when she also had the buzzed-about Anita Hill movie and the Oscar-winning "Django Unchained" in release, I can't see her getting one now that she's in her 40s and to my knowledge has no major projects set for release this year.
 
Kerry has a project currently, technically this year. She's on broadway in American Son, which ends this month. Previews started in October. I would give a description of the play but it's politics talk, so never mind.

Amanda Seyfried was able to get a cover for an off-broadway play in which she dealt with the aftermath of hooking up with someone after a wedding. I kid you not. Oh yeah, and Ted 2.

Sienna Miller was able to get a cover for a broadway play (I don't believe it was off-broadway) and for G.I. Joe - one of the best movies of the year /sarcasm.

But Kerry, who was originally featured in Vogue back in 2009 when she first appeared on broadway in a David Mamet production wasn't good enough to get a cover for American Son despite being the star and producer.

Not to mention that Anna knows who Kerry is since Kerry has attended CFDA awards and Met Galas since the mid 00's and they were both appointed by Obama to the President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.

I guess Kerry's too trashy and not classy enough for Anna?

Same for Zoe Saldana, in that she's also been featured in Vogue in the early 00s (and even as recently as 2013) and she's also attended CFDA awards and Met Galas since the mid 00s. She wears clothes well and is in big movies but nothing for her either.

If Anna thinks Kerry and Zoe are trash and aren't good enough to cover her classy magazine /sarcasm, I just don't understand why people predict or wish/expect for a Viola cover (too old, too dark), Taraji (too 'common'), Tracee (she out of Zoe, Kerry Viola and Taraji is an actual TV star. No one can name any credits for Tracee that aren't tv shows).

Angela B. (she just started getting covers last year with Allure and Elle outside of Vanity Fair in the 90s and those covers last year that's probably it for her), Regina (she has no mainstream mag covers that I can recall), Tessa (same as Zoe Saldana), Yara (this article alludes to Vogue staffers assuming that Yara wouldn't appeal to their audience, so much so that they didn't think her profile would go over well with readers, despite Yara being good enough for the Chanel suits to make her a friend/spokesperson for the house). Imagine that, Yara was good enough to get a contract from the most prestigious fashion house but Anna Wintour and Vogue staffers still had reservations about giving her a 2 page profile with a one page picture, and the list goes on (Issa Rae is another one that comes to mind).

Zoe Kravitz's biggest most substantial role to date is Big Little Lies but since she has YSL's backing, she could possibly get a cover, but I still think that's a long shot since it would have to happen in the next couple of issues and those are possibly spoken for between Lupita, Hailey and Justin, Brie and Ariana.

Laura Harrier has LV's backing, but she needs more movie credits. If Anna Wintour wasn't such a obnoxious snob, Kiki Layne would've been a phenomenal January cover choice with If Beale Street Could Talk and her next movie, Native Son, premiering at Sundance, but Priyanka Flopcha's wedding to a Jonas brother was just too compelling for Anna so she couldn't pass that up.

Cynthia Erivo might have a chance this year if her Harriet Tubman movie comes out and is well received, but she also isn't sample size, doesn't wear top designers (Chanel, Prada, Valentino, etc.) is too 'common' with her hair choices (the blonde hair she's partial to) and doesn't seem thirsty to network and kiss up to Edward Barsamian, so I can see reasons why Anna wouldn't choose her either.

All of these women, are deserving of covers. And if there's a change of the guard at US Vogue, and Edward becomes the EIC, they may very well get covers.

I think that would be the smartest thing Edward could do to differentiate his magazine from Anna's. And I very much doubt these covers wouldn't go over well with the American readers and make this magazine the most relevant it's been in some time.

So I guess the question is, do tFSers really mean what they say when they suggest these women as cover subjects? Do they really want these women to get covers? Or are tFSers just going along with the crowd and suggesting which black woman is getting the most press coverage at a given time?

Because you can't read above and think that Anna should still stay at Vogue and Edward should not get her job. What are the other options? An Eva Chen or Amy Ashley (or Sally Singer or whoever else is still at Vogue) at the top would be Anna 2.0. These women will still be ignored. So for me, it's either you really want these women to get covers and want Anna to be gone so there's a chance it might happen, or people are just saying they want these women to get covers but you all really don't when it comes down to it.
 
Last edited:
Kerry, just like Taraji, Tracee, Angela and Zoe had covers from other CN titles under Anna's consultancy. Kiki had a big edit in last month's issue. So I don't think it's a matter of 'they're not classy enough for Anna's Vogue' or all that cringey talk about skin colour.

I also find it interesting that you reckon Edward will easily give them covers. He's not even championing fresh or rare British talent on the cover right now. We know if we'd want that, we must look elsewhere. UK Harper's, Elle etc. So far his roster is made up of Emma Stone (OG, for a Hollywood issue at that!), Rihanna, Taylor Swift.

Fun fact: Both Anna and Edward have 5 x debuts for their respective editions since December 2017, not counting models. That's women who have not booked the cover before.
 
Last edited:
Your points are all valid octoberchild, except for the one about Edward being the person to completely make these changes.

Sure, there are several unpredictable—for a lack of better word—cover subjects in his resume by now (e.g. Gugu, Dua Lipa, and his choices of models with the exception of Adwoa and the Hadid sisters), but more often than not, he, like Benn28 pointed out, favors more renowned American over British celebrities. Not exactly an attribute I’d associate with someone who would be a game-changer. Besides, if by appointing him as the next US Vogue EIC would result in more American women of colors on the cover and his tenure at Vogue UK is basically an audition for that position, don’t you think he should’ve given covers to Viola, Kerry, Tessa, Zoe, etc by now? The only American women of color he has featured so far are Oprah and Rihanna (CMIIW if there’s more of them).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kerry, just like Taraji, Tracee, Angela and Zoe had covers from other CN titles under Anna's consultancy. Kiki had a big edit in last month's issue. So I don't think it's a matter of 'they're not classy enough for Anna's Vogue' or all that cringey talk about skin colour.

Wrong! You have got to be kidding me.:rofl: The fact that those women have covered Conde mags and in some cases multiple Conde mags but have yet to get the big prize demonstrates that Anna doesn't think these women are good enough to get the cover of her trash magazine! They're good enough for other CN titles but not Vogue. I mean, that's what I've been arguing for years!

How do you not see that? What's your argument for them not getting covers then? And don't say tv because plenty other tv stars (Blake Lively, Debra Messing, etc.) got covers when they were on shows. There is no argument other than the one I've made. There's just not. And the fact that you said that wrong, illogical and nonsensical statement demonstrates as much. If you had a solid, logical argument, you would have made it.

And for the record, Kerry herself got her first Vanity Fair and Glamour magazine covers, in 2013 without Anna's help/approval. Kerry and Cindi Leive are good friends. That's how she got her first Glamour cover. Not because Anna so generously bestowed it upon Kerry :lol::rolleyes:.

And as for Vanity Fair and Graydon Carter, Graydon never gave a damn about Anna anyway (and rightfully so) so I'm sure he wasn't getting approval from Anna to give Kerry a cover.

Vanity Fair has championed Kerry for years before Anna became CD. She first covered their Hollywood issue in 2005. Was featured in the Hollywood issue again in 2007. Was featured in the magazine in 2012 and 2013 and got two covers in 2013 (the Hollywood issue and her solo August cover, being the first black actress to ever cover the mag solo). Krista Smith, once Kerry's solo cover was released, tweeted that she was so proud of Kerry and that she wanted Kerry on the cover since they first met. When Vanity Fair posted the article announcing Graydon's retirement, out of all the celebs they could've name checked, they name checked Kerry.

Despite what you think, Anna is not god, Kerry got those covers because she put in the work and Cindi/Graydon and their staff could see Kerry for her smarts, talent and beauty, something Anna seems completely blind to. Let's give Cindi and Graydon credit where it's due. Because Anna surely doesn't deserve it.

And lastly, you really revealed yourself with "all that cringey talk about skin colour". I'm not talking about just skin color - race is a social construct with lasting material consequences for those who have been "othered" so no, it's not just about skin color, it's about what Anna wants (or doesn't want) her covers to say about black women (Vogue despite not being a beauty mag, does uphold standards of beauty), it's about how class and beauty in addition to race impact how black women navigate the world and whether they are truly seen accordingly (and whether they're celebrated for who they are or if they're only celebrated if they fit some narrow-minded (Anna) person's idea of what's worthy and deserving to be celebrated).

You also don't really care about why the aforementioned women haven't landed a cover. It's neither here nor there for you. So since it's not something you care about, and since I'm going to keep calling out Anna's hypocrisy as I see it, you probably should just skip my posts from here on out. I wouldn't want you to become so pained and troubled from my "cringey talk about skin colour" since that's just the worst thing ever.

Your points are all valid octoberchild, except for the one about Edward being the person to completely make these changes.

Sure, there are several unpredictable—for a lack of better word—cover subjects in his resume by now (e.g. Gugu, Dua Lipa, and his choices of models with the exception of Adwoa and the Hadid sisters), but more often than not, he, like Benn28 pointed out, favors more renowned American over British celebrities. Not exactly an attribute I’d associate with someone who would be a game-changer. Besides, if by appointing him as the next US Vogue EIC would result in more American women of colors on the cover and his tenure at Vogue UK is basically an audition for that position, don’t you think he should’ve given covers to Viola, Kerry, Tessa, Zoe, etc by now? The only American women of color he has featured so far are Oprah and Rihanna (CMIIW if there’s more of them).

Sigh.

I'm not one to make blanket statements about countries and cultures I know very little about (more people should try it), but let's use Benn98 as an example of what some British people think (not all, I'm sure, just want to point that out).

Benn98 just thinks all my posts about race are just so cringey and just so distasteful and all other kinds of things so Britain and America obviously have "different approaches to race" (although, if you were to ask a British black person, it's more than likely they would be more in line with my thinking than Benn, ala Jourdan Dunn or even Edward himself).

If this is in fact true, that British people have "a different approach to race" don't you think that could influence Edward and his approach to the magazine? I mean, I know Edward is everyone's whipping boy on this site, but let's put ourselves in his shoes for a moment.

Isn't he the first black EiC of any Vogue? And isn't he the EiC of a Vogue that's been traditionally white? In a country that has "a different approach to race". As the first black EiC of any Vogue, and him being aware of how monumental that is and if he screws up, don't you think the powers that be could very well use his 'screwing up' as a reason not to hire any other black people as EiC of Vogue? So don't you think that influences his approach to the magazine? And thus why "Viola, Kerry, Tessa, Zoe" haven't gotten covers of his magazine yet - not to mention the fact that it probably makes more sense for him to give covers to black British actresses like Gugu and hopefully Naomie soon instead of American black actresses?

Now, once Edward gets the EiC position at Vogue US, don't you think some things might change? Like I said before, if I were Edward looking to make a statement about how different my magazine is compared to Anna, the easiest and biggest/most significant thing I could do would give all the black actresses (and other women too who have been denied covers because they weren't white or skinny) who haven't landed covers under Anna a cover. If I were Edward, you would not see Bey, Rih, Lu or Serena on my cover for at least a year, if not longer. That automatically would let everyone know a new day is at Vogue.

It's also why I'm so perplexed that Anna refuses to give these women a cover. Is Anna that clueless and in her own world wearing rose colored glasses and completely out of touch with reality that she thinks those women won't ever get covers?

I mean, unless Anna plans on not leaving Conde Nast unless she's on a stretcher with barely a pulse, it's just not realistic. I've also said this before, but it seems like her refusal to give these women covers is borderline personal. Because when Edward does, people will be asking why this women didn't get Vogue covers before. And unless Anna retires to England to live in anonymity, she'll probably get questioned about it, if not outright bad press if she somehow lands another high profile position doing something else.

So to point fingers at Edward for not doing something when he's in a very unique position as the first black EiC having to make sure to keep suits happy with no room for error, wanting to make the magazine his while having to balance not alienating readership while also letting potential readers who have previously been excluded from the magazine that they can see themselves in his Vogue - that's a lot.

I personally think Edward is probably held back in a lot of ways at Vogue UK, in part due to Britain's "different approach to race". Ways in which he won't be held back at Vogue US. So I think that's something else people need to take into consideration regarding their "criticisms". Just because he's not a game changer in your mind doesn't mean he won't ever be, especially if provided the right conditions to thrive. To be blunt, a gay, black man immigrant at Vogue US - I think a lot of people would eat that up. If he, on top of that, gave Kerry, Viola Tracee, etc. covers, I think he'd be golden.

I really think an expansive look at not only the EiCs (Edward, Anna) but the conditions they work in (print magazines impending death?) not to mention the cultures and expectations put on them (Edward) or expectations cast aside (Anna) - these are all things that need to be considered to have any real insightful conversations about all of the aforementioned. I personally think tFSers perspectives on these things are entirely too narrow.
 
I want Doutzen Kroes for Vogue UK by Meisel or M&M.
 
Unfortunately, you can't edit posts after 5 mins (which I don't understand) but I do want to add this anyway as a footnote to my post above. When Reese recruits Kerry to give a quote for her Vogue profile, Anna is okay with it, but I guess Kerry is only good for quotes and not covers.

But apparently, my argument doesn't hold water despite a lack of people making other arguments that actually make sense.

Anyway, my last parting words for this thread (and these forums for the foreseeable future) are if there's anyone who you want on/predict a cover for, if they're over 40, without an Oscar win/nom or without tens of millions of IG followers (or the wrong race), they won't get the cover.

I think the evidence Anna has provided has made it pretty clear. And I used the wrong word previously, I'm not cynical, just very observant and not willing to take any thing any one throws at me at face value. Being skeptical isn't bad at all, especially now more than ever.
 
Girl can you like relax and chill a little bit.

You're acting like being on some us vogue cover a lot of people aren't even gonna buy is the be all and end all for Hollywood starlets. Honestly I find it very childish for you to go off every time someone you think is worthy or deserving of being on the cover is not actually on the cover. At the end of the day it's just a damn fashion magazine, it doesn't represent the world as a whole and still you can find some diversity in its content, whether it's enough or not that's another discussion for another day. Throwing a fit and hating on a fashion magazine on a daily basis because of some petty reasons is not a good look on you.

Anyways moving on, for some reason I thought of Grace Elizabeth, Kaia Gerber and Adut Akech appearing on the model issue if there is one this year.
 
Anyways moving on, for some reason I thought of Grace Elizabeth, Kaia Gerber and Adut Akech appearing on the model issue if there is one this year.

Definitely think Grace is a huge possibility. Used to think Bella also stood a chance, but the magazine doesn't even seemto use her that much and I think she's no longer at Dior Beauty? Saw a vid of her getting tattooed by Donatella on IG...
 
Bazaar:
I have no idea, but I certainly know they'll put "THE BEST BAGS AND SHOES" on the cover or someting like that. Just wait...

PiM5dXmA_t.jpg

harpersbazaar.com

I have to laugh...
 
I do think the Kaia covers will continue in 2019, but in the years beyond that, I also think she may exit the industry before she truly comes into her own as a model, either because she becomes tired of working in it, or something happens that alarms the public (some sort of issue/concern involving body image or being pushed too hard too early).

She's by no means perfect as a model, but she's got a lot of potential to do some great work.
 
I do think the Kaia covers will continue in 2019, but in the years beyond that, I also think she may exit the industry before she truly comes into her own as a model, either because she becomes tired of working in it, or something happens that alarms the public (some sort of issue/concern involving body image or being pushed too hard too early).

She's by no means perfect as a model, but she's got a lot of potential to do some great work.

I can see this happening. For some reason I keep wondering if she’d get a solo US Vogue cover just so that she and her mom could post on Instagram with a caption that says “like mother, like daughter” or “Cindy Crawford, 1986 by Richard Avedon” (it was her first Vogue cover, wasn’t it?) and “Kaia Gerber, 2018 by Steven Meisel” (a stretch, but hey, anything could happen).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any predictions for Vogue Paris?
The only one I can come up with is maybe Fran Summers, if so probably by David Sims.
 
Any predictions for Vogue Paris?
The only one I can come up with is maybe Fran Summers, if so probably by David Sims.
Fran seems like a contender even if I'm not sure how many times she has been featured in the magazines. I think we might see Rianne again as she's a clear favourite at VP and Imaan has been featured quite a lot so I would not exclude her.
My wishes are Imaan, Birgit Kos and Othilia Simmons
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,613
Messages
15,191,084
Members
86,519
Latest member
sidLar
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->