2011 Academy Awards

^That, and also, Pete Postlethwaite nominated for The Town? Please excuse me while I go die of laughter. I get that the B in BAFTA stands for British, but he was in no way, shape, or form the best thing about that movie.

Even though I know it won't happen, I hope True Grit wipes the floor with these other movies at the Oscars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There were a lot of deserving winners at the BAFTAs but sometimes I think the British bias is a little too much. I think Barbara Hershey or Lesley Manville should have won over Helena Bonham Carter. However, I'm really happy that David Fincher won Best Director and Alexandre Desplat won Best Score. I hope they win their respective categories at the Oscars.
 
Yeah, me too. I loved the trio. It's the best part of that movie. But I guess I still didn't see a lot of the other nominees...
 
About Pete Postlethwaite, it was a last regognition before his untimely death. I don't find it funny :unsure:
 
Oh my God, I totally forgot that he died! Now I feel terrible, too. Just, uh, pretend that sentence wasn't in there.

Still, the nomination was ridiculous. He was a brilliant actor, but that's what lifetime recognition awards are for, and he took a slot that belonged to someone who actually deserved it.
 
The Social Network won the ACE Eddie last night for Best Editing. That's a pretty big precursor and it may just show that TSN is still alive. Although, it may also be too little too late.
 
And True Grit took the top award for Sound Mixing at the Cinema Audio Society.

And as it says in The Hollywood Reporter: "The Eddies often serve as a predictor of the eventual best picture 
Oscar winner. Over the past five years, the Eddie, Oscar for Editing and Oscar for Best Picture have matched each year except in 2007."

Makes things a tiny bit more interesting for Oscar night.
 
I keep wishing things turn out interesting and unexpected on oscar night, but judging from the past years, it's all so predictable right?
 
I found this comment on another website, and for me it says it all.

Nic V says:
Monday, February 21, 2011 at 6:34am

You know this thread of TSN suddenly becoming the orphaned child of the Oscar is almost ridiculous anymore. For the last month this horse has been beaten too death so badly that you can’t even recognize it’s a horse. For months we all believed that TSN was going to win BP. Personally I still don’t see it losing. The comment that TSN is some magnificent earth shattering phenomenon that will break the so called glass ceiling of the Academy seems absurd to me. It’s not a ground breaking film. The only real qualities TSN has going for it are the editing and the screenplay. I saw Eisenberg recently and he played himself. There’s no real depth to any of the performances they’re all just a certain level of mean except for Garfield who is just simply a pathetic patsy. The cast comes off like they attended the Lenora Helmsley school of acting. And even being kind the only character IMO I thought came off with any credibility was Timberlake. Even saying that I did empathize with Garfield but after awhile I was at the point of going how many two ton bricks have to hit you in the head before as Cher would say “Snap Outta It”.

As for the technical aspects the only standouts are the Screenplay and the Editing. Thank god it isn’t in original screenplay or we would have to listen to wailing about how could it loose the Original Screenplay to the new genre of film we have called the “sweepie”. The sets are boring as they should be. There is really no art direction. The cinematography is simply dreary so that it underscores that evil is lurking in the minds of men. I mean lets get real. So much of the technical aspects of TSN are as manipulative as they are in any film. That doesn’t make them ground breaking.

As for subject matter evil isn’t new. Greed isn’t new. Unless of course you haven’t seen Wall Street or All The Kings Men. Hell Ralph Fiennes played evil to the core in Schindler. Eisenberg doesn’t come close.

It’s a good movie. It’s not a great movie. And I’m not jumping on the TKS bandwagon. But in all honesty the film that capitalized on technical achievement was and will always be Inception in 2010. Performances in other films are a hell of a lot better than the one dimensional performances in TSN. I will give Fincher his due because after Editing and Screenplay the accolades do belong to him for making a film that moves along and doesn’t get bogged down in banalities. The Fight Club was a better movie than this and honestly speaking if the man ever got cheated by the Academy it was for Zodiac. Looking at his resume TSN would be third in my list of his accomplishments.

awardsdaily.com
 
I'm still hoping The Social Network wins. I ADORED The King's Speech, but in terms of innovative film making...I think the Social Network wins this one.

There have been quite a lot of enjoyable, period films with ensemble casts.
So The King's Speech adding nothing new in that respect.

However, in terms of acting...TKS wins it hands down.
 
none of the Best Picture nominees impressed me much,
TKS and TSN were OK at best. don't see what the big fuss about those flicks.

i only care about the Oscar for Foreign film and documentary.
trying to watch them all before the big day,
but even though i live in NYC
can't seem to find Incendies, Hævnen and Waste Land documentary, anywhere! help.

had high hopes for Biutiful by Iñárritu.
so far Dogtooth is my pick for Foreign film, but i still want to see Incendies and Hævnen. help me find them. thanks!

-dorien
 
I find this article very interesting. Anyone has a link to the original? this is a translation (from spanish by google) from an article in english.


Who votes?

Oscar. Are 6,404 members of the Academy Awards, but how should I do to be an academic?

They are 6,404. For the most part live in the Los Angeles, and some in northern California, New York and London. They are, by a small majority, men. Their average age is fifty-seven. Rupert Murdoch is one of them, as well as Pedro Almodóvar and Sasha Baron Cohen. George Lucas, Woody Allen and Dwayne Johnson, however, are not. On Sunday announced to an audience of over thirty million people the results of a secret ballot that will determine the course of many careers.

It is, of course, members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the group of professionals in the entertainment industry responsible for delivering the Oscars every year. The headquarters of the Academy is a mirrored glass structure located on Wilshire Boulevard, which suggests that the entity does not like to reveal much about its inner workings. Enter by invitation only, for what we need the sponsorship of two members and the approval of a board of governors. Once you enter, you are a member for life, something that critics of the organization used to present an image of elderly too busy with their oxygen tanks to think about their vote. When Henry Fonda and James Garner admitted that their wives were voting for them, a scandal erupted.

There is also the case of Dolores Hart, the actress who kissed Elvis Presley in Loving You, 1957, after which he retired and became a Catholic nun of the Benedictine Abbey of Regina Laudis in Bethlehem, Connecticut. Today the Mother Dolores is 72 and still a member of the Academy. Each year the Academy will send copies of the nominated films, which makes it the only nun who rate the work of Quentin Tarantino.

The Academy consists of fifteen branches, of which the largest and most powerful group in terms of voting is to the actors, which consists of 1,205 members, 22% of the total. Are you guaranteed a victory to live to the limit last year for not being entirely convinced that the blue people of Avatar was actually acting. The following producers (452 members) and managers (437), which, along with advertisers (368), said Ann Thompson, a columnist for Indiewire website, tend to "a little more conventional, to movies like Milagros unexpected rules of life or Chocolate. They are the group that Harvey Weinstein knows how to talk. "Finally there are the various trades, sound effects, costumes, etc .- as they descend into the credits have to be mostly men. Thompson calls the "carnivores" and like the solid and grand narratives of the kind of Braveheart and Saving Private Ryan and Temple of steel, to the Origin. It is a large group, and that in 2006 he secured a victory and rejected Cuts Ang Lee's gay drama Brokeback Mountain. This year reduced to a minimum nominations My family, Lisa Cholodenko gay drama. "Carnivores are the reason that Annette Bening is losing," says Jeffrey Wells, who runs the website Hollywood Elsewhere.

In recent years, the Academy is to streamline the membership process for younger players and eliminated the traditional requirement of three film credits to allow, for example, the entry of Dakota Fanning in 2006. Have also begun to announce new additions every year, including Michelle Williams, James Franco, Michael Cera, Emily Blunt, Anne Hathaway and Seth Rogen.

At the same time, the Academy seeks to maintain its number of members in the six thousand after a sharp rise in 2003, which means that the only thing that can lead to new revenue is the death of current members, and the quickest way be at the top of the invitation list is a nomination. "The Academy tends to change," says Thompson. Jon Landau, who produced the Titanic, not come until after Avatar. This is the type that produced the Titanic! The truth is that it is very difficult to enter. "Moreover, the anonymity which surrounds the Academy is a breeding ground for all kinds of pride and prejudice. Anyway, whether or curse on Sunday to hold their elections, we must bear in mind that the average voter is not a reader of Cahiers du Cinéma and an old man falls asleep and gets on your shirt with the soup. Most likely to be fans of Godard with children.
clarin.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The schedule was leaked:

01. Best Art Direction – Presented by Tom Hanks
02. Best Cinematography – Presented by Tom Hanks
03. Best Supporting Actress – No presenter announced
04. Best Animated Feature Film – Presented by Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis
05. Best Animated Short Subject – Presented by Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis
06. Best Adapted Screenplay – Presented by Javier Bardem and Josh Brolin
07. Best Original Screenplay – Presented by Javier Bardem and Josh Brolin
08. Best Foreign Language Film – Presented by Helen Mirren and Russell Brand
09. Best Supporting Actor – Presented by Reese Witherspoon
10. Best Original Score – Presented by Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman
11. Best Sound Mixing – Presented by Matthew McConaughey and Scarlett Johansson
12. Best Sound Editing – Presented by Matthew McConaughey and Scarlett Johansson
13. Best Make-Up – Presented by Cate Blanchett
14. Best Costume Design – Presented by Cate Blanchett
15. Best Documentary Short Subject – Presented by Jake Gyllenhaal and Amy Adams
16. Best Live Action Short Film – Presented by Jake Gyllenhaal and Amy Adams
17. Best Documentary Feature – Presented by Oprah Winfrey
18. Best Visual Effects – Presented by Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr.
19. Best Film Editing – Presented by Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr.
20. Best Original Song – Presented by Jennifer Hudson
21. Best Director – Presented by Kathryn Bigelow and Hilary Swank
22. Best Actress – Presented by Jeff Bridges
23. Best Actor – Presented by Sandra Bullock
24. Best Motion Picture – Presented by Steven Spielberg

Anyone a little underwhelmed? I hope there are a few surprises. I'm also kind of sick of seeing Tom Hanks every year. No big Hollywood legends. I also find it random that they gave Cate Blanchett Makeup and Costume Design, and Hilary Swank Best Director and Reese Witherspoon Best Supporting Actor? Wouldn't it have been more logical for Blanchett, a previous Best Supporting Actress winner, to have presented Best Supporting Actor? Or did Witherspoon think the categories Blanchett got were beneath her? I hope at least Christoph Waltz comes considering the Best Supporting Actress presenter still hasn't been determined.
 
21. Best Director – Presented by Kathryn Bigelow and Hilary Swank

And after last year's supposed breakthrough for women directors, here's another list of men. Debra Granik's film is in the Best Picture category yet no-one seemed to give her a thought for a Director nod.

From the way they're grouping these categories together it seems they are really desperate for the show to finish in under three and a half hours.
 
Stupid Academy. Kathryn is perfectly capable of presenting by herself. You know they are doing this just because the general public need a celebrity to present.

But on the other hand usually they don't confirm director/picture and someone special comes out. Previous years directors don't usually present the next year. Danny Boyle didn't give Kathryn hers.

Bad move for Mo'Nique not to be attending. I forgot she even won last year. If they previous winner can't give it then it's usually is any past female Oscar winner and Reese was probably free.

RDJ is going :woot:
 
Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr!

But a lot of the categories and presenters are a bit random, no?
 
And after last year's supposed breakthrough for women directors, here's another list of men. Debra Granik's film is in the Best Picture category yet no-one seemed to give her a thought for a Director nod.

From the way they're grouping these categories together it seems they are really desperate for the show to finish in under three and a half hours.
They don't need to nominate a woman everytime one makes a decent film. In my opinion, I don't think she should've been nominated.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,455
Messages
15,185,057
Members
86,286
Latest member
bertammann
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->