2011 Academy Awards

i was rooting for hailee to win best supporting actress, we would've been saved from that
incoherent babble of melissa leo's.

and what was up with james franco the entire time! :shock: :shock:
 
Every year there is one person that gets the backlash and it's Melissa Leo's turn.

It sucks in my opinion. She is a brilliant actress. Other actor praise her all the time. This is her second nomination and this win was well deserved. Just because she did that stupid campaign shoot and was a bit over the top in her speech doesn't mean we should all turn against her.

Sometimes I really hate the aftermath of the Oscars.
 
i agree i am very happy for melissa. she is a great actress and i think she really deserves an oscar.
 
yeah,i think melissa was really the only person i was taken with as far as front-runners. really the one i felt was genuine. so what her acceptance speech wasn't conventional....at least it wasn't boring or trite. besides it was her moment,anyway.

the whole oscar season though has been very disappointing....if not aggravating. 'i am love' didn't get a lot of recognition in spite of being largely touted as one of the indefinite best films of 2010. and for me it was the best. only costume design and it didn't even win that even though it involved some innovative work thanks to raf at jil sander exclusively for the film. the whole film season last year really wasn't all that spectacular...in fact it was pretty lacklustre compared with years past....i think they could have made room for such a film,i thought.
 
I'm just happy Inception finally got some recognition and brought home 4 awards. It was more than I was expecting to be honest. Of course I wanted my bb Christopher Nolan to win, but I knew it would be a long stretch anyway.
 
To me, this NYmag article sums it up. Franco and Hateway's energies were the complete opposite, and not in a good way. She seemed too desperate, he looked like he couldn't even try to care. And then there's David Fincher. I really can't believe he didn't win and, even worse imo, lost it to Hooper. Seriously?? I was disapointed in the ceremony, overall.

Oscar Wrap-up: What Worked and What Didn’t



You can usually count on the Oscars to be either good or bad, boring or surprising. This year's ceremony wasn't quite any of those things; instead, it was weird, thanks to the unsettling sense that we were watching a taped dress rehearsal full of inside jokes, presenters stumbling over their awkward banter, and dead air. To be fair, it's hard to stage an Oscar ceremony in the modern era — essentially, you're trying to make about two-dozen highly predictable wins seem interesting — but has there ever been one this loopy and low-key? Sometimes that off-kilter approach was successful, but more often than not, it left us scratching our heads. Here are five aspects of the show that worked, and six that definitely didn't.
What Worked
No unnecessary montages
In years past, the Academy has indulged in totally time-wasting montages that have only the most tenuous connection to the Oscars themselves (remember the horror montage last year, which seemed to exist solely to get the actors from Twilight some screen time?). This year, those tributes were mercifully absent, and the only montages left were stirringly cut sequences that emphasized the movies that were actually nominated this year. Fancy that!
Luke Matheny's win for Live-Action Short Film
If there was anyone in the Kodak Theatre who could outdo Helena Bonham Carter for best awards-season hair, it would have to be the follicularly fecund Luke Matheny, who bounded onstage when his God of Love won the short film Oscar. "I should have gotten a haircut," the Brooklyn-based filmmaker muttered good-naturedly, and he closed his enthusiastic speech with a line just as good, aimed at his girlfriend: "Sasha Gordon, you're my dream come true." Fun fact: Matheny's Oscar-winning short was rejected by Sundance and Slamdance. And you can watch his 2008 Cyrano de Bergerac–inspired short Earano here.
The off-the-cuff remarks
Every time a presenter went off-book, they were immediately funnier and more winning than when reading the iffy material on the TelePrompTer. Whether it was Cate Blanchett dropping a well-timed "That was gross" after a clip of The Wolfman's special effects or Anne Hathaway joking "Flub! Drink at home" when she blew a line, the unplanned moments (especially Kirk Douglas's aggressively unexpected filibuster) provided the few times that the show really came to life comedically.
Robert Downey Jr. and Sandra Bullock
Just imagine if these two presenters — who make it look so easy and even fun — had been your Oscar hosts instead.
The first three King's Speech speeches
Fittingly, the men behind The King's Speech really knew how to talk onstage. Seventysomething screenwriter David Seidler got a good line in about being a late bloomer, while director Tom Hooper brought his speech to a dramatic pause with a heartfelt tribute to his mother, who was responsible for bringing the property to his attention. And then, what a moment to see Colin Firth so moved, and even shaky, after an awards season where he could be counted on for preternatural calm at the podium. Sadly, everyone had taken their Valiums prior to the film's Best Picture win, when the producers, cast, and crew crowded the stage and barely cracked smiles.
What Didn't
Franco is from Mars, Hathaway is from Venus
If Franco and Hathaway's oppositional approaches to hosting had been set up from the very beginning as the comedic heart of their partnership — spaced-out, jaded, eye-rolling Franco having to put up with manic, yelping, enthusiastic Hathaway; energetic, game Hathaway having to encourage Franco to get into the spirit — it might have worked as a comedy routine in the Burns-Allen mold. Instead it was like watching two people operating in alternate realities (or having two very different drug experiences), with the distance between them expanding and expanding as the show went on. Hathaway committed, and committed hard. She sang, she emoted, she projected. Franco, meanwhile, went blank-slate, projecting nothing except expressions verging on outright disdain. As he got more and more ironic, she got more and more worked up. He may have kept his cool (and tweeted up a storm), but why take this job if you're not going to try? And he left Hathaway hanging in the wind, exposed as a Rachel Berry in front of 100 million people.
The jokes
Contributing mightily to the lack of good juju between Hathaway and Franco was their lack of material. Even the opening pre-taped sketch, in which Hathaway and Franco got incepted into Alec Baldwin's dreams, wasn't that funny or tight — and that's the bit they get to vet in advance, and edit for the best delivery. (It ended, anachronistically, on a Back to the Future joke. We love Back to the Future, but why?) From there things just went pear-shaped: Franco introduced Jake Gyllenhaal by saying, like a robot, "He made out with my co-host ... in a movie." Later, he introduced presenters by saying he was connected to them through six degrees of Kevin Bacon, and we could look that up on the Internet. The only topical joke of the night arrived when Franco came onstage in drag and said to Hathaway, "You got to wear a tuxedo, so I wore this. The weird part is I just got a text message from Charlie Sheen." It speaks to the paucity of humor that this actually got a big chuckle from the audience. Say what you will about Ricky Gervais's "mean-spirited" performance at the Golden Globes, at least he made and delivered jokes. Franco and Hathaway aren't comedians, and if their respective drama-queen and Quaalude-inflected deliveries didn't help them put this mediocre banter over, it's not their fault it was mediocre in the first place.
It was so white
The only people of color onstage during the show were Oprah, Halle Berry, Jennifer Hudson, and some of the adorable, head-bopping kids in the P.S. 22 choir. This is embarrassing enough, but it was awkwardly heightened by the lengthy tribute to Lena Horne, the one person who died this past year who was given a special honorary segment, and not just included in the In Memoriam montage (into which Corey Haim did not make it). It's not that Horne doesn't deserve the honor, just that it played like the producers' implicit acknowledgment that they had a diversity problem, and were using Horne as a way to whitewash it. While speaking about Horne's career, and her difficulties in making one, Berry said, "that was a very different time in Hollywood." Well, not different enough.
Changing up the presentation of Best Actor and Actress Awards
For the past two years, during the presentation of the acting awards, five non-nominated actors have been gathered up, with each delivering a personal message to one of the nominees. While this was sometimes cringe-worthy, it was also sometimes sweet, and it was always a way to personalize the experience, both for the audience and the nominees. Apparently this year's producers agreed: They kept in the personal tributes, but instead of having them delivered by different actors, someone the nominee ostensibly really knew, they opted to have them all delivered by one presenter. Look, Sandra Bullock is so charming and professional she can give five speeches to the five Best Actor nominees and make them all go over. Jeff Bridges, awesome as he is, not so much. Either do away with this format altogether — it sure would save time — or fully commit.
Bare-bones musical performances
Over-the-top musical spectaculars are easy to make fun of, but being able to make fun of things is part of what makes the Oscars enjoyable. This year's musical performances, back in the show after being exiled last year, were all extremely sober affairs: Why have Florence Welch on the show just to, like, moan softly for a minute? And whatever your feelings about Gwyneth, her and some Muppets not only would have lightened things up, they would have been the highlight of this show.
Bob Hope, the hologram
To be fair, the Oscar producers couldn't have known before the show what a bad idea it would be to have Billy Crystal do a monologue — a walking, talking reprimand to Franco and Hathaway, on how to host and make it look pleasant and easy — but cutting to some strange Bob Hope projection? They should have known better. Having, thankfully, cut all the aforementioned montages, they had some extra time to fill, but this was just strange and creepy, especially when Hope "introduced" Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law. Ick. Don't have him do that. (Fun fact (?) No. 2: Freaks and Geeks creator Paul Feig originally supplied the voice of Hope introducing Downey and Law, but found out while watching the broadcast that they'd bumped him for someone else.)
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/02/the_oscars_wrap_up_what_worked.html
 
completely agree with that article ^
i do kinda feel sorry for anne hathaway though, its not that she was terrible (ok the 'WOOO's were terrible..), but she tried too hard and her efforts just ended up looking all the more awkward because of james franco's unresponsiveness. she did have some charm though and i liked several of her outfits. i commend her for at least trying, and ''showing up'' if you know what i mean..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,476
Messages
15,186,364
Members
86,349
Latest member
gino99
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->