*AndoraStar* said:LOL.. Shot me, but I kinda like what they are wearing!!
Don't we all don't we all ... At least secretly
![tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue2.gif)
![90s23on.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg151.echo.cx%2Fimg151%2F6295%2F90s23on.jpg&hash=9130b46034f671bb7de781c760f59182)
![90sherbritts8mu.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg151.echo.cx%2Fimg151%2F7506%2F90sherbritts8mu.jpg&hash=a2826e4fa00c5c5f37fa1f70d32bf113)
*AndoraStar* said:LOL.. Shot me, but I kinda like what they are wearing!!
iluvjeisa said:Well, Zimdor, it would appear we are diametrically opposed as far as style and music goes. Perhaps not completely since I certainly like Nirvana and some other bands in the same cluster (critically acclaimed pretentious 90s stuff). I will not get started on your (implied) statement that a band is less commercial if it's not a hair band....that's just...uhm....not very eclectic of you B) Let me also remind you that punk rocked emerged from glam rock (NY Dolls, etc), so I would say that Guns n'Roses brought back punk rock into mainstream, rather than Nirvana. But well, well, OT and all that.
Fortunately for me, fashion started going glam again around 2000 (of course with the BIG PARTY and all) and has progressed on that theme since. Music, of course, is somewhat lagged, but last year things started happening and now I see Green Day are using lots of make up these days, which is an improvement.
It goes without saying that we'll soon get right back into the pretentious 'save the world and lets tell the kids about the meaning of life'-bands again, in the familiar circular pattern of fashion, trends, style and history in general.
Personally, I keep hoping for the heroin chic retro - I love pinpoint pupils and strung out decadence (in photos)![]()
happycanadian said:and if you actually truly think that Marija is more significant than ANY of the 90s supermodels listed in this thread. how many times has Cindy Crawford been in Vanity Fair? What about on the cover of Vogue?? How many has Marija? Nuff' said.
softgrey said:haha...andora...
age is a state of mind...
actually..i think the reason why we don't have models on the covers of magazinesw these days...is because the 'little girls' of today can't sell a magazine the way these girls could...the only one that can ..is gisele...and that's because she is more 'womanly'...
girls like these just don't exist today...i don't know why...
but everyone's been looking for them...and cannot come up with any...
it's odd...
do you guys remember yasmeen ghauri...??
softgrey said:haha...andora...
age is a state of mind...
actually..i think the reason why we don't have models on the covers of magazinesw these days...is because the 'little girls' of today can't sell a magazine the way these girls could...the only one that can ..is gisele...and that's because she is more 'womanly'...
girls like these just don't exist today...i don't know why...
but everyone's been looking for them...and cannot come up with any...
it's odd...
do you guys remember yasmeen ghauri...??
softgrey said:haha...andora...
age is a state of mind...
actually..i think the reason why we don't have models on the covers of magazinesw these days...is because the 'little girls' of today can't sell a magazine the way these girls could...the only one that can ..is gisele...and that's because she is more 'womanly'...
girls like these just don't exist today...i don't know why...
but everyone's been looking for them...and cannot come up with any...
it's odd...
do you guys remember yasmeen ghauri...??
PussyLee said:How can I?
I was interested in fashion when I saw a runway shot of Yasmeen Ghauri in a Christian Lacroix frock.....I saw pure beauty. I said to myself, wow, I didn't know God was so unfair to create this being in Perfection. The Face, and the Hour-glass figure did it for me........I beg and beg for my sister to grab me a copy of Vogue in our town's K-mart and I was obssessed!!!
I also remember when I got my first Cosmopolitan Magazine. May 1993. My sister and I had a Big Fight. I was saving money for the magazine and I like Cosmo because they Always put Vava-voom Supermodels on the Cover (Cindy, Linda, Christy and Claudia are regulars) and have mini-interviews of them inside. I went inside the store and and was soo embarassed ( I'm a lil' 12 year ol' boy) to pay for it at the cash register with a Fat lady Cashie with an inquiring evil stare, So I grab GQ instead (at least it has Helena Christensen Kenar ad).
So I beg and beg for my sister to pick me up a copy, and She did. And Hell broke loose. I demanded a refund!!! I expected Glamorous Amazonian Supermodel on the cover, Cindy, Paulina or Niki........instead I got this flat-chested bony model in pink tops and bottoms, she looks like a 13 year old kid acting/made grown up. Me and my sister fought and fought all day! My hard-earned cash (selling lemonade) went to drain. Now I'm stiuck with GQ ( yuck ) and a Pink Cosmopolitan.......
It has Kate Moss on the cover. KATE MOSS then, went to changed the modelling industry's idea and perception of Beauty.
softgrey said:actually..i think the reason why we don't have models on the covers of magazines these days...is because the 'little girls' of today can't sell a magazine the way these girls could...the only one that can ..is gisele...and that's because she is more 'womanly'...
scblonndie said:^Yes, Kirsty. Prettiest model in the world imo.