Australia's Next Top Model

I have nothing against Izzy, her attitude and enthusiasm are great. I just don't think she's as photogenic as the others and at the end of the day, that matters.
 
being different is great if you're still beautiful [gemma, mcneil, anna s, jac jab etc]
izzy is plain ugly, and i'm not just hating, it's a fact
 
I recently started watching this franchise and I must say how utterly impressed I am about the production value, the actual model potential and the balance of reality tv emotions in the style of editing. It's actually great tv.
However I must get one thing off my chest. I do realize particular judges specifically play a devilish role in order to boost the entertainment value, but the two surgically enhanced judges that are supposed to emote a sense of professionalism, behave like mean spirited children. Sticking to one-note critiques and subjective preferences and IMO only project their own insecurities and failed teenage dreams onto these girls. I seriously cannot look at their over-botoxed masks and accept their vision of beauty and worse their definition of "expensive". Like , seriously, you with the glued sunglasses on your head? Let's not even start about that so called 'runway' coach who has nothing to add and is only muttering stale platitudes like "work it, sell it, own it". Really, Miss thing?:ninja:

Pfew, now that's gone, Montana is the only real contender here, clear from day 1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just don't think she's as photogenic as the others and at the end of the day, that matters.
What matters is that she's done with her shoots after taking a few frames(effective time and money-wise) leaving photographers quite inspired and impressed, which is a rare thing compared to "the others"!:flower:

The good thing is that creative director/mentor(Josh?) adores her, in the end he's the one present at each shoot they do.

However I must get one thing off my chest. I do realize particular judges specifically play a devilish role in order to boost the entertainment value, but the two surgically enhanced judges that are supposed to emote a sense of professionalism, behave like mean spirited children. Sticking to one-note critiques and subjective preferences and IMO only project their own insecurities and failed teenage dreams onto these girls.
Completely agree. The feedback has nothing to do with the girls anymore, feels like the main focus is on who's dominating the panel and who belongs to what clique. Charlotte versus Alex(with Sarah as a sidekick to everything he says).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont think izzy is gorgeous and typical pretty girl, but she produces amazing photos. I can imagine her on the catwalk for shows like dior. I dont want her to win tho ahah
 
Hazel is waaaay underrated here. Girl has the potential to become a superstar.

This. :heart: :p

Doubt she will win but oh wells she just should find a good agency and start working anyway !

And I don't really see that much resemblance to Karlie. Hazel's features are not as sharp as hers.
 
For me, Hazel's face is kind of the mixture between Karlie and Aline
I hope she's going to be the top 2 with Montana
 
I recently started watching this franchise and I must say how utterly impressed I am about the production value, the actual model potential and the balance of reality tv emotions in the style of editing. It's actually great tv.
However I must get one thing off my chest. I do realize particular judges specifically play a devilish role in order to boost the entertainment value, but the two surgically enhanced judges that are supposed to emote a sense of professionalism, behave like mean spirited children. Sticking to one-note critiques and subjective preferences and IMO only project their own insecurities and failed teenage dreams onto these girls. I seriously cannot look at their over-botoxed masks and accept their vision of beauty and worse their definition of "expensive". Like , seriously, you with the glued sunglasses on your head? Let's not even start about that so called 'runway' coach who has nothing to add and is only muttering stale platitudes like "work it, sell it, own it". Really, Miss thing?:ninja:

Pfew, now that's gone, Montana is the only real contender here, clear from day 1.

I do remember Charlotte saying at one point this season that she had screwed up her own opportunities when she was younger and she didn't want these girls to do the same, so you're not wrong.
 
Looking for pictures of Hazel I came across this one...

galleryImage_374919859.jpg

fox8.tv
 
I haven't watched this season but is Rachel the girl on the right? She looks like a mum...and yes EW...
 
Rachel's a pretty girl with a great height,but she is not that photogenic TBH and her photos so far are plain and obviously overrated by the judges.I mean even Simone could take some incredible photos and Rachel's portfolio is just boring.
 
in that picture, Hazel and Caroline could pass as models, while Maddie looks like a pretty girl next door, while Rachel looks like some random woman who wanted to be included in the photo
 
I have to agree! I love her smile and personality, but a model she is not.
 
So I read an article that said Sarah would receive the results in an envelope on finale night and that voting lines would close earlier… are they really doing another 100% audience vote?! It's even more imperative that Rachel and Izzy get cut before the F3 then. And Simone. I think this will be the downfall of the show for me. One of the best moments in NTM history was watching the clients unanimously vote for Alice, giving her the lead and seeing Jodhi completely lose all composure when her imagined control over the outcome went out the door.

Looking for pictures of Hazel I came across this one...

Oh my. "One of these things is not like the others..." :lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,078
Messages
15,208,077
Members
87,031
Latest member
mikevasilakis
Back
Top