ok....
i don't think it's bad at all..Wrong for Chloe? Yes. Yes, yes, yes.
Andersson said himsel, that this brand is for real women, right? So, who, might I ask will wear those shoes? Maybe, there is only so much you can squeeze out of Philo's best-selling shifts, shoes, bags, and jewellery left by her..BUT it isn't wise to completely disregard that legacy as well.
A cotton dress with an arty print? The girl will buy Marni. Masculine shoes? Balenciaga and Marc Jacobs. It was precisely that vintage feel, as frivolous as it is, that shaped Chloe in the past few years...and set it apart. I don't even know what the big cheeze at the company thought about this.
I think there will be an enormous showroom collection also.