Watch Live & Comment... The 2025 Met Gala!
MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.
fashionaddict1 said:How did you get the style.com photo's?
I don't see it up there yet?
Is there a trick I'm missing . . .
.
Luxx said:Perhaps I would like this more if it wasn't Chloe. Some of this is interesting but where is the brand identity? Even with all the designer switches at Chloe there was always something fun, functional and girly about each collection. There was always a stand out pair of shoes and a really of the moment bag to get excited about, something inimitably Chloe that connected the entire endeavor. You looked at a Chloe piece and you knew it was Chloe. I look at this and I think "well thats Marni pattern and a Marc Jacobs-esque shoe" I don't feel anything is overtly original or even particularly appealing. It all seems a bit forced. It just doesn't have the energy and spirit of Chloe.
DiorlingThe accessories should be illegal, they're unbelieveably ugly. THE SHOES, those heinous shoes! And the bags have really gone past quirky hobo into just plain hobo.