D
Deleted member 7575
Guest
I agree!
Chloe Spring 2006 was the best Chloe collection ever. It was innovative with the fabrics and it was interesting with it's styling. It was also boyish without being too androgynous. It was really a great collection, period.
Also, the shoes were possibly the most widely copied, interpreted, worn shoes EVER!
You have to admit that Phoebe had that ability to make girls swoon over her cool, nonchalant Chloe aesthetic Bblush:
I think this is partly because she, like Stella, had that 'British beat'. She didn't take herself too seriously and she didn't feel that pressure of a [somewhat] bourgeoisie clientèle. The fact that she comes from a sort of bohemian-rock-English world makes her dynamic at Chloe work.![]()
I think what made Phoebe so successful was that she understood how important it is for clothes to look and feel "cool" but at the same time connote a sense of luxury. In fact she recognized that the brand has an identity as a purveyor of luxury. Chloe may have always been a RTW name but it was never anti-bourgeois by any means. I wouldn't describe the attitude as Rock and Roll in the least bit. The expense in the fabrics and design was never hidden in her work. That's another problem Paulo had, his clothes didn't suggest class or luxury at the first glance, it works for a brand like Marni but not for something as literal as Chloe.