Gucci Spring Summer 05 | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot

Gucci Spring Summer 05

I love the jackets, but that's probably because they remind me so much of Alexander McQueen's designs :blush:
some of the dresses are nice, but the overall effect of the collection is lost on me - it's just too random - although for a first collection it seems pretty decent :flower:
 
the handles of those hobo bags are very interesting... too bad the bag got attacked with a riveting gun... Ugh.. interesting shapes too, but they could have been handled a bit better. I've seen much better gucci accessories in the past.

As for the clothes.. it coudl've been worse! She is the new designer and has a lot to live up to coming in after Ford. Definitely could've been a lotttt worrrse!
 
Yikes. I want to see it all, but so far things don't look good. It looks so dated, especially with that hair! :blink:
 
Originally posted by mikeijames@Sep 30 2004, 02:56 PM
i'm sorry...but where is this new looseness? looks as tight as ever to me....maybe i need to see more :unsure:
[snapback]381132[/snapback]​
My thoughts exactly.....some of those pants look almost identical to last springs that were in shades of blush as well. I see plenty of past Gucci and, is it just me or do some of those tops look kinda Proenza Schouler?

It doesn't seem at all different, but yet it's not the same at all. It's not very well styled at all.
 
They dont look too bad, but I dislike those super tight shiny trousers one of the models were wearing.
 
Originally posted by mikeijames@Sep 30 2004, 02:56 PM
i'm sorry...but where is this new looseness? looks as tight as ever to me....
[snapback]381132[/snapback]​

:P ...seriously...could the pants get any tighter?!?!?>... :lol:

i never thought i'd miss tom ford... :shock:
 
New model Ford keeps Gucci on track in Milan

Jess Cartner-Morley in Milan
Friday October 1, 2004

The Guardian

In the unlikely event that any in the hand-picked audience at last night's Gucci show in Milan were unaware that this was the first show under a new designer, they probably would not have guessed.
All the Gucci elements - the bondage-tight satin and split pencil skirts, the deliberate flashes of bare skin contrasted with the needle-sharp stilettos - were in place.

The distinctive Gucci showmanship was as evident as ever in the Martini trays beforehand, the dramatic lighting, the glitter shower finale.

But the audience were, one and all, acutely aware that this was the first show by Alessandra Facchinetti, successor to Tom Ford, the designer who steered Gucci to success before leaving in the spring. Indeed, many of the same front row were in tears as they said goodbye to Ford on this very catwalk six months ago.

But confusingly, the point is that this was not really Facchinetti's first show for Gucci at all. She has been design director of Gucci womens wear for four years.

Ford worked on several different labels and his role was one of guidance and editing; Facchinetti's job description has changed little, except that this guidance has been removed. The million dollar question in the world of luxury brands is, is Gucci still Gucci without the Midas touch of Ford?

On the evidence of last night's show there's no doubt Facchinetti can make clothes sexy enough to satisfy even the rapacious Gucci customer.

This was easily the tightest, most body-conscious collection of this Milan fashion week. But any designer has to perform a balancing act, being true to the brand but also to what feels modern, and the satin drainpipes, while classically Gucci, did not look like anything women want to wear right now.

Elegantly constructed corset tops, waisted jackets and tight skirts in divine damson and coffee silks were beautiful but, again, a little too much of a homage to the Ford era. It was almost as if Facchinetti were still trying to create a collection that would please Ford, and that is no longer the point.

Where Facchinetti came into her own was in eveningwear. Chiffon cocktail dresses, with seams of transparency traced around the body's curves between arcs of metallic beading, had that elusive, catch-your-breath, I-want-that-now quality that makes a brand take off.

When Ford was in control of Gucci, the images of the designer and the label blended into each other. Handsome, smart and charming, Ford was a walking, talking symbol of his brand.

When he stepped on to the catwalk at the end of one of his shows, he looked the ideal male counterpart of his models. This was what made him so valuable to Gucci; but towards the end, it was also what made the owners of the business view him as a potential liability.

Facchinetti could be a media-friendly face for the brand: she is young (32), with a dark, rock-chick look. But to date she has kept a low profile. Some say that this is because she is a very private person; others say that she would like fame but her bosses do not want another superstar designer on their hands.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

I hated Gucci under Tom Ford and I still hate it. :ninja: :innocent:
 
The whole show is up at style.com. Very bad, in my opinion. Looks very dated. This isn't fall 1999 and the whole "rich hippie" business needs to go. The bags and shoes, however, were beautiful and will definitely satisfy the Gucci customer.
 
00020fNatashaPoly.jpg
00280f.jpg

Lovely makeup :heart:

00330fMariacarlaBoscono.jpg
00400f.jpg
 
that's what happens when designers get intimidated..
she lost a great oppurtunity to make a difference and steal the limelight.. but she blew it
the fact that she was responsible for the last ..eight Gucci collections,
is evident through the collection, shes trying too hard to be Ford.

Gucci needs a new designer, imediately. They need to freshen up.
They look too dated for their own good. Are they locked in a 70s bubble?
 
Spring Summer 05 ?
Am I the only one who thinks the collection colourwise has a much more autumny feel to it? It's so dark..I don't know what it is..but come Spring and Summer..I want to shed those dark rich colours.
 
bit horrible & sluttish from what i've seen so far, and so dated..

'new era of feminity'?
could they mean 'new era of sluttiness'? :lol:

Lena I totally agree. I hoped that this new woman would have wanted to tone down the wh*re-ishness of gucci. It seems not. maybe she doesn't have a free reign from her bosses though...
 
100104_12.jpg

actually the tiny bolero is very cute :ninja:

Gucci: Alessandra Facchinetti did what she had to do. Whatever nerves the newly ascended Gucci designer may have felt in the days and weeks leading up to her maiden performance for the house, backstage on Thursday she seemed utterly cool and in control. But she must have felt the eyes of the fashion world upon her. After all the speculation, hype and dust-settling, she was about to publicly assume the mantle of one of the most successful designers of the last decade, whose final show was his best ever.

Facchinetti’s mandate was clear and specific from the start: to carry on at Gucci along the course established by Tom Ford. She started in the circular foyer of the show space at the hotel Diana Majestic where, instead of filling colossal urns with flowers, she had myriad orchids dripping from the center chandelier. Inside, the high-polish runway also looked very Fordian.

“I believe in [the Gucci look],” Facchinetti said during a visit to New York this summer. “I love Gucci. I love how it was before.” And while acknowledging the likelihood of a natural seasonal progression, she added, “that doesn’t mean that the woman is someone else. She’s still the same.”

The customer is the same, but the designer is not. Before the show, Facchinetti said her aim was to continue the deeply ingrained Gucci attitude established by Ford while making her first collection “less schematic, with a more real element.” Certainly the clothes retained that essential take-no-prisoners sexuality, as well as some familiar silhouettes. Facchinetti took very specific house standards and worked them her way — a move that should please retailers who may have worried about a sea change unsettling to consumers. Thus, the small jackets, low-slung pants and corseted constructions all got ample play. There were also super sexed-up, barely-there swimsuits, and even a sprinkle from above — tiny sparkles rather than rose petals — to announce the arrival of the racy evening section. Throughout, many of the clothes looked quite strong, and they clearly sent the message that, for now, at least, an aesthetic revolution is not part of the Gucci game plan. As for the accessories, while none of Frida Giannini’s newly softened shoulder bags leapt off the runway, they were lovely enough, as were the gold sandals with pebbled heels.

Nevertheless, Facchinetti tried to pick up where Ford left off, and at times her ambition exceeded her experience. Her more complicated cuts — the kind it took Ford years to work up to — simply lacked that all-important Gucci polish. The other big point of departure: In her decision to avoid a major theme, Facchinetti probably made the right choice. But this made for a catch-22 of sorts, since much of the power of Ford’s work lay in the gutsy, over-arching statement he put forth each season.

With probably the toughest collection of her young career behind her, Facchinetti has begun the difficult task of establishing herself as a major industry force in her own right. In the meantime, she has served her house and its customers well under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

from wwd :flower:
 
I don't hate it but I'm not loving it either. It feels more like a Fendi collection to me. I'm not getting the Gucci feeling from this collection. Hope her next collections will be better.
 
I don't like it. I didn't love tom's designs, but they were better. I've never been a gucci fan, but I think this collection is so bad, I don't like the dresses, the colours are bad...
 
now that i've seen the whole thing...it's like "where is the new stuff?"...all i see here is tom ford re-hash...but even if tom ford was there, he would be moving it forward...i just don't see any hints at a new direction or even progress in the same direction.
 
I hope Maria Carla Boscono gets the new Gucci campaign. She looks fab this season! Then again, so does Dewi Driegen and Jacquetta Wheeler. And did anyone notice that Carmen Kass was storming the runway like mad? In NYC she's aligned herself with newer designers a la Zac Posen and Roland Mouret and Luella. I am surprised to see her in Milan, since certain top models (Karolina Kurkova for example) now skip it. She even showed up at Prada (exit #2)! But she was not at Gucci. Strange.

Seems like Gucci used a lot of new girls, some of whom I don't recognize from NY or London. I especially like Mimi Roch. The makeup is gorgeous, no doubt. For once, from Pat McGrath!

Thoughts on the collection... Very much like Tom Ford (too intimidated to change), but not as thematically driven. Conceptually, it was nothing new, even with the Indian accents. New designer failed to reorient Gucci back into a trend-setting brand. All that croc-leather and safari suits not to mention the studded belts look odd this season. And where is the evening glamour? There was a grand total of three evening gowns, and the cocktail frocks look like variations of one another. I do like some pieces and find the collection quite wearable, but this is quite a disappointment after a tasteful resort collection.

Fave looks:
00100f.jpg
00170f.jpg

00390f.jpg
00330f.jpg


The shoes (esp. the Mary Janes) and bags are nothing to write home about.
 
Ok, there were looks I liked, and I liked a lot of the warm, rich tones........but.

There was no direction, none at all. Some of the things were too detailed for their own good and that article about loosness and femininity????? Where?

The jackets, especially the pseudo-safari ones paired with taffeta trousers, looked good.....but nothin else that impressed me.

Honestly, I think Gucci is going to be screwed either way. If the designers went in a completely new direction, people are gonna be like 'This is Gucci?' and if they try to continue in Ford's footsteps, it'll never have the same appeal.

I think PPR was totally wrong in appointing three creative directors. There's no final word, and that's why this collection seemed so scattered.
 
Originally posted by Spacemiu@Oct 1 2004, 11:46 AM
i have to say i like the shoes
[snapback]382110[/snapback]​

i thought she wasn't designing the accessories...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,391
Messages
15,300,574
Members
89,364
Latest member
Asdf5944
Back
Top