Live Streaming... The S/S 2025 Fashion Shows
travolta said:what's bad taste really? it's really just the elitism of being 'in the know'... no different than high school if you think about it
fashionista-ta said:Didn't Diana Vreeland say something like, everyone needs a soupçon of bad taste, it's no taste that's the problem?
Have celebrities ruined fashion?
Anna And Patrick Exit Calvin Klein
Why 32 will become fashion's chicest number
Friday, September 16, 2005
celebrity generated looks may seriously damage your style
travolta said:what's bad taste really? it's really just the elitism of being 'in the know'... no different than high school if you think about it
lamb said:I hope this thread makes any sence
iluvjeisa said:Oh I love DV!
People have always copied big stars - so that's not an issue - and the most beautiful and stylish stars have always made the covers (Deneuve, Grace Kelly, Raquel Welsh, Natalie Wood...). Select beautiful stars have graced the covers since the 50s. But today there is no selection - as long as it's a 30+ accomplished actress with an IQ over 100 it's all ok. Beauty and innate grace are no longer determining factors for who nabs a cover.Unfortunately.
In my opinion tt's just FINE with celebs on the covers but there are not enough celebs who are gorgeous and stylish enough to actually carry a cover. Winona Ryder, Kate Winslet, Gwynneth, Angelina, Drew Barrymore, Demi Moore, Emmy Rossum, Mischa Barton (has anybody seen how similar to Veruscka she is?!??!), Nicole Kidman, Uma Thurman....I'm probably forgetting a few. But there aren't that many who have beauty and grace. A cover face must have that or else it's a failure. No matter who it is. And great models ALWAYS have these two qualities, whereas movie stars don't necessarily.
love that.I wouldn't credit them with anything as exciting as that.