I fall into the 'I tend to believe the accuser' category, especially if she has been seriously questioned by the police and examined. In this case, while I don't consider the wife of the accused a powerful figure in the fashion industry, she is definitely connected to powerful people and my guess is that, while the general public does not know who the accuser is beyond her age and rank, most fashion insiders probably know her identity and too often the attitude in fashion is "just bite the pillow and take it," so it is not an easy environment to make allegations of even mild misconduct.
HOWEVER, I really, really, REALLY wish that the press would not identify the accused until an indictment has been handed down or at least some kind of evidentiary hearing has been scheduled. If he is guilty, then there will be plenty of time to heap vitriol on him when that information comes to light. There are enough instances where serious allegations have been made of r*pe and other crimes have not panned out for me to not feel comfortable with knowing that someone that I know, in a tangentially celebrity kinda way, is the subject of a serious investigation.
HOWEVER, I really, really, REALLY wish that the press would not identify the accused until an indictment has been handed down or at least some kind of evidentiary hearing has been scheduled. If he is guilty, then there will be plenty of time to heap vitriol on him when that information comes to light. There are enough instances where serious allegations have been made of r*pe and other crimes have not panned out for me to not feel comfortable with knowing that someone that I know, in a tangentially celebrity kinda way, is the subject of a serious investigation.
Last edited by a moderator: