Do you like some of these proposed proportions, Scott?
It's not that I don't like a looser trouser-- or that it's such a late-90s signature-- so Tom Ford for Gucci, or very Tom Ford for YSL 2001 that I would think anyone designing for Jil would think better than to bring it back now when others have already done it. It's that the fit here looks horrendous-- like one of those skinny kids that are wearing his dad's "dress pants" that are a few sizes too large for them. It's sloppy in some of the looks. I mean, is he serious with the big and baggy polo sweaters worn with the even more baggier and bigger trousers? It just looks like how someone in a Harmony Korine film would dress...
Jil's always been known for her sharp sense of proportions and even sharper fit. She may propose volume, and she may propose volume upon volume, but she was never sloppy-- and her offerings were always luxurious. This collection is really spotty to me: Some great pieces with great cuts in ultra-luxe materials-- but it's also smeared throughout with some damn sloppiness and cheapness.
Half of the collection is ill-fitting and I loathe it. But my God, the other half is so lush and so sharp. Had this been a small, tight collection that only concentrated on the leathers, the icy grays and glen-plaids, and the double-breasted and belted coats, I'd be on my knees... That 3/4-length leather anorak will be mine. It's so very Helmut! Swoon...