karen sofie
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,336
- Reaction score
- 1
I appreciate your posting skills, Laisla


Does anyone know the price of the leather jacket?

I just put in an order, which will probably be canceled like the last 2 orders. There isn't a lot on the site right now. I was surprised to see the bustle dress up for this season, and it is almost $300 us dollars!
did you order a size down?
but if it arrives I'm sure I'll make it work. I didn't buy it, I actually found a vintage 80's dress with a bustle that I love a couple of months ago for a steal![]()
I bought the blue daisy print dress & the broderie anglais dress, which I just realized is navy and not blackbut if it arrives I'm sure I'll make it work.
I just guessed at my sizing, I remember when I visited London/Topshop last time their clothing ran small so I ordered the next size up.


If you're asking about the cropped Victorian-style leather jacket, it is 150 quid according to last week's Grazia magazine.
), but it's already gone though. Or it isn't available yet. I'm afraid that 'unavailable' is TopShop's way of saying 'out of stock'. It means every size is gone for online purchases. The item may or may not be back in stock again, depending on TopShop; we won't know. Limited lines e.g. the sold-out tuxedo jacket byTodd Lynn for Topshop won't have any new stock. When it shows it's unavailable, that's really gone and no chance of seeing in online again. But for the previously sold-out twice star-print blouse (the top version of the dress worn by Alexa Chung), it was unavailable once but a week after, it was available again with completes sizes online before it was sold out and became unavailable again. No sign of any new stock so far. I suspect the Kate Moss range might be more like the former case tho.Are the striped flare jeans only made in a 32 lenght??
I'm about to order know
Some thing are 'unavailable'...what does that mean? Not the same as 'out of stock', right?

IMHO some of these clothes are dead on ugly...If they didn't have Kate's name on them I sure they wouldn't sell at all..at least some of the new stuff from her spring collection..
Yeah I agree. Some of the clothes are just plain boring, if not ugly, and they ain't cheap either because they bear the name of Kate Moss. It's same with her previous collections tho. There's always some hit and miss with some real gems.
