But he can be just designing menswear and once she’s out, he does everything, no? I guess that’s what LVMH will say, which makes total sense.She is suing LVMH because they have reportedly set JWA with his own DIOR Studio with out announcing her departure, which is a breach of her contract.
It’s interesting because how does it impact her contract?She is suing LVMH because they have reportedly set JWA with his own DIOR Studio with out announcing her departure, which is a breach of her contract.
I don’t think the issue is about sales if there’s a disagreement between the parties.To be fair, as much as we didn't like her work, LVMH has been doing her dirty once she stopped making money for them. It was the same people who championed her female gaze and milk her corporate feminism.
We have seen similar situation in Virginie but kudos for MGC fighting back.I don’t think the issue is about sales if there’s a disagreement between the parties.
The world is healing...To be fair, as much as we didn't like her work, LVMH has been doing her dirty once she stopped making money for them.
Im convinced its a management issue. Delphine took over so things may have changed in terms of management and clearly she hired her favorite. If the news of JWA being there has been shared to that extend all over Paris, is that she was ready to move on a long time ago.We have seen similar situation in Virginie but kudos for MGC fighting back.
I totally understand but I think it will be very difficult to prove a prejudice as they haven’t publically announced her departure. Because both parties will fulfill their contracts at the end of the day. That’s why I’m a bit confused.She is disputing the overlap. Her contract has not been terminated and she is still in contract with Dior however they have overstepped and apparently set him up with a full working studio for all collections.
She is a bitter piece of work if this is true. I get she's in her feelings and all, but I still do not see how JWA starting to work oversteps her unless they packed her things up to move him in and what he's designing is taking from her team working on her final collection while she's still there. If it's just him in a studio with a few of his team that's coming in, I see no problem. I am so ready for her era in Dior's history to be over.She is disputing the overlap. Her contract has not been terminated and she is still in contract with Dior however they have overstepped and apparently set him up with a full working studio for all collections.
Why are they doing her dirty? They are letting her contract finish, will let her show the world another monstrosity of a collection and on top of that she’s getting paid millions for it.To be fair, as much as we didn't like her work, LVMH has been doing her dirty once she stopped making money for them. It was the same people who championed her female gaze and milk her corporate feminism.
You have to remember one thing.If they are so desperately in need of kicking her out and installing a new CD before her contract expired, they should have paid her out like Kering with SdS. I would say it is quite humiliating for any designer in similar position let alone for a successful designer like her. We all know she is a bad designer, but it doesn't mean that she is disposable. If Dior can afford to set up new studio and hire new people(other than moving the atelier)for the new CD, they can just terminate her contract in advance(but possiblely unwilling to pay her out ).
But that's the thing, she was not terminated with immediate effect or asked to leave immediately just as @Lola701 said. Her contract is up and it won't be renewed, but she is being allowed two shows, one in Rome which is surely for her ego. I cannot remember any designer being allowed such a « victory lap » at any house that they didn't create. She did do commercially well at Dior and they are honouring that, but Dior is a giant business and precious child of the Arnaults so they will do what is necessary to keep it running. It's not personal.If they are so desperately in need of kicking her out and installing a new CD before her contract expired, they should have paid her out like Kering with SdS. I would say it is quite humiliating for any designer in similar position let alone for a successful designer like her. We all know she is a bad designer, but it doesn't mean that she is disposable. If Dior can afford to set up new studio and hire new people(other than moving the atelier)for the new CD, they can just terminate her contract in advance(but possiblely unwilling to pay her out ).
Are you for real? Who on Earth would like to be dismissed? Imagine headlines saying: Dior terminates its contract with MGC inmediatly That's bad. No farewell, no final show, no nothing.If they are so desperately in need of kicking her out and installing a new CD before her contract expired, they should have paid her out like Kering with SdS. I would say it is quite humiliating for any designer in similar position let alone for a successful designer like her. We all know she is a bad designer, but it doesn't mean that she is disposable. If Dior can afford to set up new studio and hire new people(other than moving the atelier)for the new CD, they can just terminate her contract in advance(but possiblely unwilling to pay her out ).
Which one is it, out of curiosity?I am unfamiliar with the corporate culture in European fashion houses, but in our culture there is more decent way of having somesone take over the position after the employee has left.
Well I must admit that I watched it entirely just because I loved the humor (and because I find Pike's voice hypnotizing)... She repeated D JOURNEY BAG so many times with that sensual voice that I was quite convinced to buy this disgusting bagWhat a bizarre and out of touch advertisement for the public.
It seems like an internal message mode. I guess they were trying to do humor? Or not?