Matthew M. Williams - Designer

Personally, as someone who loves High Fashion, I love the fact that I can buy what I see on the runway. I hate the idea that the only way to achieve fashion is through T-shirts and Jeans.
But thats how it works nowadays. Majority of customers will buy a chanel bag or a gucci belt just to pair it with something from Zara.

In the age of fast fashion I dont see many people eager enough to splurge on a expensive piece of clothing that they can easily get cheaper in department store/mall. Especially when you consider that collections get more boring and commercial every season. We will soon end up with high end versions of hm.

For me there are very few designers whose work can be called high fashion.
 
But thats how it works nowadays. Majority of customers will buy a chanel bag or a gucci belt just to pair it with something from Zara.

In the age of fast fashion I dont see many people eager enough to splurge on a expensive piece of clothing that they can easily get cheaper in department store/mall. Especially when you consider that collections get more boring and commercial every season. We will soon end up with high end versions of hm.

For me there are very few designers whose work can be called high fashion.
Yes but there’s a difference between a luxury customer and a fashion customer. And there’s even difference within luxury and fashion customers.

While High Fashion mimicking Fast Fashion has been the new normal as @jeanclaude said, and even more since Hedi took over YSL, the desire for real fashion has never been higher.

There’s a difference between the person who buys a 6000€ Chanel jacket and a person who only buys the bag. There’s a difference between regular Rick Owens or a Martin Grant customer. There are people who are more attracted to brands than designers and the way around.

The best models for me in the industry is Rick Owens. Why? Because it’s really a fashion brand in it most complete way. At Rick Owens, you have a sense that the T-shirt is treated with the same integrity as the big runway pieces. And Rick Owens is not a luxury house. It’s a fashion house. The pieces are expensive because of the craftmanship or the exclusivity, not because it’s luxurious...

Adrian Joffe made too much compromises in order to « keep the creativity on the runway ». Don’t get it twisted, the people who are buying the CDG logo pieces and other subs-sub lines of items made in China are the same hypebeasts who buys Virgil’s stuff or Demna’s triple S.
 
^ Yes but since its all about money how many people are the " luxury customers ". I may be wrong but i dont think its a big group and even though they choose the most expensive options the income from their spending isnt that relevant when compared to the profits accessories and bags give. Also what does the word luxury really mean nowadays.

In my opinion Owens is a totally different case. But then again I think we all have different idea of what a fashion/luxury house is.

I dont understand the CDG part. Can you explain? I have always thought their business is going well..
 
Last edited:
^ Yes but since its all about money how many people are the " luxury customers ". I may be wrong but i dont think its a big group and even though they choose the most expensive options the income from their spending isnt that relevant when compared to the profits accessories and bags give. Also what does the word luxury really mean nowadays.

In my opinion Owens is a totally different case. But then again I think we all have different idea of what a fashion/luxury house is.

I dont understand the CDG part. Can you explain? I have always thought their business is going well..

I believe CDG business is going well with so many sub-line that basically are working with old CDG items with cheaper fabric, but it's still call CDG-something. But as Lola said, the money for CDG runway collection mostly come from their other collection or commercial pieces. They need the runway collection to be interesting in order to make their brands cool.
 
^ I actually was aware of that and I dont think its a bad approach. At least we dont see cdg tshirts and sweatshirts on the runway.
 
^ Yes but since its all about money how many people are the " luxury customers ". I may be wrong but i dont think its a big group and even though they choose the most expensive options the income from their spending isnt that relevant when compared to the profits accessories and bags give. Also what does the word luxury really mean nowadays.

In my opinion Owens is a totally different case. But then again I think we all have different idea of what a fashion/luxury house is.

I dont understand the CDG part. Can you explain? I have always thought their business is going well..
That’s the thing. The majority of people are luxury customers as they consume leather goods or entry priced level items. Fashion customers used to be a smaller part maybe a decade ago but their spending habits were good enough to maintain a healthy business. The business part for most brands used to be 60/40 with leather goods being 60% of sales to fashion being 40%. For a brand like Hermès, it used to even bigger with fashion being 10 or 15%. But then again, 10% of 2 billions is good.

It all changed with Nicolas Ghesquiere, Hedi Slimane or Alessandro Michèle because part of their plans was to make RTW more a business force into brands.

But then again, big conglomerate and small fashion brands needs to have a totally different approach. That’s why I mentioned RO, as for me, if you aren’t in the top 5/top 10 brands, that’s what you should aspire.

We agree about that on luxury. The problem is that unfortunately, with brands being bought by big conglomerates, luxury became the word used to describe fashion...And the price point became the element used to differentiate a luxurious product to another.

About CDG, I think we just have a different point of view. I prefer seeing people wearing the runway stuff (was limited as it can be) than seeing those tacky logo stuff. If a great show only inspire people to buy tacky logo t-shirts, it’s then better to put your best T-shirt ever on the runway.

But don’t get me wrong, I love CDG but as see it as a performance art. It’s interesting, beautiful and it stand out in DSM but I’m more connected to Junya Watanabe as it’s less detached from my reality. I love the fact that a piece of clothing can allow me to be more daring.

But then again, our appreciation of fashion is totally personal. Your points are valid even if I don’t share the same POV.
 
The problem is that unfortunately, with brands being bought by big conglomerates, luxury became the word used to describe fashion...

I totally share this view, to the point that I am almost embarrassed to use the word in an actual sentence.
Years and years of empty marketing lingo have made it completely devoid of meaning, pretty much like the term "iconic", which is similarly thrown around in the same careless way.
The LVMH and Kering of the world have deliberately muddled the waters on the subject deviously playing on an obvious misunderstanding: all luxury is necessarily expensive (when certain criteria are met, at least) but not everything expensive is necessarily luxury. To the benefit of their bottom lines and at the damage of a wealthy but not very discerning global customership, too eager of status recognition to really pay attention to what they buy.
And that would not even be a problem in itself (except for the finances of those customers, if they bothered to care) were it not for the fact that today THE PEOPLE rule, in fashion like in politics; fashion honchos and the fashion designers they hire have completely surrendered to the good old motto "the customer is always right": as anyone who's worked in retail knows, that is hardly ever true.
Designers are afraid to bring out new concepts because most people will certainly not understand them and figures will suffer in the end, and that's how you end up with stores full to the brim with logoed tees, hoodies and sneakers.
And that is the deadly embrace of fashion and late capitalism for you, guys...
 
Great, now I can completely ignore LVMH. Seriously, they are so thirsty to get to the hype beasts. I want to see his take on Givenchy Couture though. Clare's HC has been very well accepted.
 
Great, now I can completely ignore LVMH. Seriously, they are so thirsty to get to the hype beasts. I want to see his take on Givenchy Couture though. Clare's HC has been very well accepted.
Honestly I want him to bring craziness. People often forget that he was instrumental to Lady Gaga’s early career fashion. He made some of her iconic props and clothes. I’m hoping he would go past his Alyx codes.
 
As much as people might not like him, Givenchy really needs someone like him to shake things up. The matter of the fact is that CWK's Givenchy did not sell very well at all. Hopefully he can revive this struggling brand.
 
Great, just what fashion needed right now. Because Virgil and Kim Jones are simply not enough.
This appointment actually says so much, Givenchy wanted hypebeast dollars, Givenchy wants that 'cool' factor back that Tisci had but Clare didn't, but more importantly, Givenchy is playing Russian roulette by trying to recreate Alessandro Michele and Gucci. Probably heightened by the fact that Daniel Lee is somewhat of a success at BV.
I look at this as yet another HF brand lost to the hypebeast market.

Also, I initially read 'Matthew Williamson announced as new creative director....' and burst out laughing.
 
Matthew Williams is Givenchy’s New Designer

The founder of 1017 Alyx 9SM becomes the French house's seventh couturier.

By Miles Socha on June 15, 2020

Attention all hype beasts: Matthew M. Williams is Givenchy’s new creative director.

The American designer behind the 1017 Alyx 9SM label and a key ringleader of the luxury streetwear scene, Williams becomes the French house’s seventh couturier. He starts on June 16 and is expected to present his first designs for Givenchy in October.

In a statement shared first with WWD, Williams described Givenchy’s new era as one “based on modernity and inclusivity.”

“In these unprecedented times for the world, I want to send a message of hope, together with my community and colleagues, and intend to contribute towards positive change,” he said.

He expressed gratitude to Givenchy parent LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton “for trusting me with the opportunity to fulfill my lifelong dream.

“The maison’s unique position and timeless aura make it an undeniable icon and I am looking forward to working together with its ateliers and teams,” he added.

Williams assumes all creative responsibilities, including women’s and men’s collections, Givenchy noted.

Williams led the list of candidates floated by WWD on April 13 when it was the first to report that Clare Waight Keller and Givenchy were ending their three-year collaboration.

His arrival thrusts Givenchy back into the realm of buzz, cool and cultural urgency that it last enjoyed under Riccardo Tisci, who deftly gave the aristocratic brand a subversive edge with his Rottweiler T-shirts, muscular tailoring and Goth-tinged gowns.

While perhaps best known for his rollercoaster buckle and collaborations with Nike, Moncler and Dior, Williams, 34, is seen as a driven, versatile fashion talent with a sharp vision, strong cultural and artistic connections, and formidable technical chops.

The Chicago-born talent, who worked with Kanye West and Lady Gaga earlier in his career, has in recent years been based out of Ferrara, Italy, a key hub for craftsmanship and headquarters for his Alyx brand, founded in 2015. Williams is to relocate to Paris, while maintaining his independently-owned Alyx brand.

He arrives at Givenchy in a difficult context, the coronavirus pandemic having deflated a lengthy luxury boom and jeopardized fashion’s most sacred rituals, particularly the fashion show. While organizers of Paris Fashion Week are hoping to schedule physical shows this fall, several brands are proceeding with alternative formats in anticipation of travel restrictions and continued social-distancing requirements.

Beyond that, his challenge will be to quickly galvanize the house around yet another new esthetic – and fast. Tenures at heritage brands have been getting shorter, and the current environment seems to favor luxury’s giant players including Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Dior and Gucci, whose scale affords multiple advantages.

While market sources peg Givenchy’s revenues at over 1 billion euros, if you include its vibrant fragrance and beauty business, the brand has lagged in leather goods, the linchpin category for Europe’s legacy brands.

Sidney Toledano, chairman and chief executive officer of LVMH Fashion Group, said he has had his eye on Williams since the designer was shortlisted for the 2016 LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers.

“We have had the pleasure of watching him develop into the great talent he is today,” Toledano said. “I believe his singular vision of modernity will be a great opportunity for Givenchy to write its new chapter with strength and success.”

Renaud de Lesquen, who joined as president and ceo of Givenchy on April 1, also expressed confidence.

“I am convinced that, with his unapologetic approach to design and creativity and in great collaboration with the maison’s exceptional ateliers and teams, Matthew will help Givenchy reach its full potential,” he said.

During her time at Givenchy, Waight Keller largely plied a tasteful, aristocratic brand of fashion occasionally spiked with toughness or subversion — a touch of latex here, a giant wing-like backpack there. Her biggest claim to fame was dressing Meghan Markle for her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018, and she won more acclaim for her couture than her ready-to-wear displays.

Tisci was arguably the most successful of a string of designers who have led Givenchy following the 1995 retirement of the founder, bringing heat and stability over a 12-year tenure.

John Galliano was de Givenchy’s immediate successor and moved on quickly to Christian Dior. Lee Alexander McQueen tried his hand next with eclectic collections — space aliens one season, rockabilly the next. Julien Macdonald went back to a style rooted in French elegance and sophistication, but did not win much acclaim.

Williams arrives at Givenchy with a resume steeped in proximity to cutting-edge culture.

Raised amid the vibrant skate culture in Pismo Beach, Calif., Williams is a self-taught designer. He started his career in fashion production, cut his teeth at Alexander McQueen, made a name for himself working as creative director for Lady Gaga and counts Kanye West and Kim Jones as his professional godfathers — the latter actually designed his and his wife Jenny’s wedding outfits. Williams designed a stylized CD buckle for Jones’ debut collection for Dior Men in 2018 that has become a brand signature.

Conceived as a brand tuned into cultural undercurrents such as Berlin’s techno scene, Alyx started in women’s wear and in June 2018 made its runway debut at Paris Fashion Week with a coed show. It has an industrial-tinged, utilitarian allure and is carried by such marquee retailers as Ssense, 10 Corso Como, Dover Street Market, Joyce, Galeries Lafayette, Browns, Nordstrom and Selfridges.

Before launching Alyx, Williams cofounded men’s streetwear brand Been Trill in collaboration with Heron Preston, Virgil Abloh, Justin Saunders and YWP. As for the moniker 1017 Alyx 9SM, it bears the name of Williams’ eldest daughter, while the numbers reference the designer’s birth date and an abbreviation of the brand’s first studio on Saint Mark’s Place in New York City.

Williams has also been a trailblazer for sustainability, employing recycled nylon and other eco-friendly materials and exploring ways to dye with less water and recycle scraps.

He’s also fanatical about modernizing craftsmanship, of which couture represents the pinnacle. In an interview with WWD last year, he said, “How can we use the technology that is available to us with the artisan approach and find a new way to create modern craftsmanship? And so that’s kind of what I am most interested in exploring…because you know that a lot of the traditional luxury has craftsmanship. If you think about Hermès or Chanel, you know, there’s a real language to the craftsmanship and…it’s like what can we do to modernize that? And also when you look to some of those luxury products, even if somebody doesn’t know fashion, they can tell that it’s been touched by hand, or it is very obvious the value in the product, so that’s something that I want to keep exploring.”

According to Givenchy, “Williams advocates authentic values of research, technical innovation and creative repurposing that align perfectly” with its philosophy of “elegant ease.

“An intuitive understanding of tailoring, technology and integrity in fashion make the designer an ideal steward for carrying the Givenchy legacy forward with modernity and power,” it added.

Williams will partner with de Lesquen, who previously spent four years at Dior Americas. A suave but discreet executive, de Lesquen also served the same amount of time as president of Dior China. Prior to that, he spent 10 years at L’Oréal in Paris, as president and ceo of YSL Beauté, and before that as global president of Giorgio Armani Beauty.

WWD: Matthew Williams is Givenchy’s New Designer
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,473
Messages
15,186,259
Members
86,346
Latest member
zemi
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->