Matthew M. Williams - Designer

As much as people might not like him, Givenchy really needs someone like him to shake things up. The matter of the fact is that CWK's Givenchy did not sell very well at all. Hopefully he can revive this struggling brand.

How is he going to shake things up? With a leather jacket, a white shirt and a tie? Come on... Even KVA's Berluti is remotely more interesting than this guy.
 
The fact that he decided to announce his tenure with a topless picture of himself says it all. Also what is LVMHs strategy here? Kim + Virgil and now MW? All kind of aesthetically the same. Regardless of what you think of Michele vs Daniel Lee, at least their designs offer something completely different for the houses which they represent.
 
I’m really not interested in his Alyx stuff but that would probably form the basis for his RTW. I’m not confident with his couture either but if he can put whatever things he learned from working at McQueen and designing stage outfits for Kanye and Gaga it might be interesting. I’m all for seeing couture that is not your typical glamorous dress. I think we sorely miss that from big houses now.
 
It’s just insane to think that it took Givenchy 3 years to be back to what it was just before Riccardo joined.

I don’t really care for Givenchy so maybe it will be a surprise. Thank god LVMH still have Ghesquiere, JW Anderson and Silvia Fendi to maintain a certain creative integrity because the group has never be that gloomy.

I can’t imagine going at the LVMH prize and being judge by designers I don’t even respect. From being choose by Karl, Phoebe, Raf, Marc, Riccardo, Nicolas and JW to now have Virgil and Matthew. I mean it’s a choice.
 
I'm torn.

I'm almost ashamed to say this, but I have to confess that I have a soft spot for this guy: despite his link to the Kanye posse, he's proved to be way more accomplished and - may I add - humble in approaching the profession than most of his peers; over the last few seasons his collections have become more and more polished, his tailoring sharper and, despite the obvious nods to the great HL, his work has more substance than he's credited for. I don't think he's a stunt and moving his operations (and family) to a small town in Italy to be close to the manufacturing process gives him more credibility that any other Jerry Lorenzo I can think of.

Nonetheless:

Has he got the technical maturity to approach Couture right now? I doubt it.

In the end, this is either break or brake for Givenchy, they are putting at stakes the last remnants of credibility they are left with. If MW fails, they might as well shut down the fashion business and keep selling perfumes in airport duty-free's.
 
nytimes.com
Matthew Williams, Collaborator of Kanye West and Lady Gaga, Is Givenchy’s New Designer
By Vanessa Friedman

Change is coming for Givenchy. The French brand is going to emerge from coronavirus confinement with not just new social distancing rules, but a whole new look. Two months after Clare Waight Keller stepped down as creative director, the house announced that it had named a new designer, and he comes not from the school of couture, but rather the school of Kanye.

Matthew M. Williams, the founder of the haute streetwear line 1017 Alyx 9SM, will be the new creative director. He will be the third Givenchy designer in three years, heralding yet another aesthetic about-face for the brand and an apparent renunciation of its Audrey Hepburn past. Mr. Williams will be responsible for all creative aspects of the brand, including both women’s and men’s wear, and will start June 16.

“I am looking forward to working together with its ateliers and teams, to move it into a new era, based on modernity and inclusivity,” Mr. Williams said in a statement. “In these unprecedented times for the world, I want to send a message of hope, together with my community and colleagues, and intend to contribute toward positive change.”

The 34-year-old from Pismo Beach, Calif., who founded Alyx in 2015, has no formal design training, but he does have a résumé that includes being creative director for Lady Gaga, art director for Mr. West, and a founder (along with Virgil Abloh and Heron Preston, among others) of Been Trill, a short-lived collective of coolness.

Like Mr. Abloh, who is now the artistic director of Louis Vuitton men’s wear, as well as Rihanna, with her Fenty line, Mr. Williams brings a sensibility forged in the crucible of the music/club scene rather than the atelier. He is also close to Kim Jones, the artistic director of Christian Dior Men and a master of the high-low street-luxe hybrid. Mr. Jones made the tuxedo Mr. Williams wore to his wedding and well as his wife’s wedding dress; Mr. Williams in turn made a buckle for Mr. Jones’s 2019 Dior debut.

All of which would suggest that Givenchy’s owner, LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, is doubling down on the idea that the future of luxury will have less to do with a designer’s ability to cut a pattern than their ability to amalgamate the broader cultural moment.

This is a skill that is, perhaps, more high stakes now than ever, given this highly fraught cultural moment, as fashion begins to grapple with its own history of racism. Especially at a group like LVMH, which, as the largest luxury conglomerate in the world, is in many ways as close to an avatar of the establishment and the exclusionary system that maintained it as currently exists.

It is also proof positive that the LVMH prize for young designers — Mr. Williams was a finalist in 2016 — doubles as a hunting ground for new talent.

Indeed, as Sidney Toledano, the chief executive of the LVMH Fashion Group, said in announcing Mr. Williams’ new job, “Since he took part in the LVMH Prize, we have had the pleasure of watching him develop into the great talent he is today.”

Mr. Williams is relocating with his family from Italy (they live in Ferrara) to Paris, though he is not giving up Alyx, which will remain independent of LVMH.

Known for his ability to marry exacting tailoring with hard-core hardware — one of his signatures is a weighty roller coaster buckle inspired by a trip to a Six Flags amusement park — Mr. Williams has an affinity for tank-size boots, butter-soft leathers, a highly diverse runway cast and a lot of tattoos (including a black cross on the nape of his neck). Cross the Green Berets with the Rat Pack and send them on weekend furlough to Gstaad, and they’d probably wear Alyx.

He has collaborated with Vans and Nike, and hence has a track record with that now essential fashion item, a sneaker (which Givenchy did not have under Ms. Waight Keller), as well as Mackintosh. He is also part of the Moncler Genius group of guest artists.

In this, Mr. Williams’s aesthetic is more closely aligned with that of Riccardo Tisci, the artistic director of Givenchy from 2005 to 2017, and the man whose gothic romanticism, understanding of the power of a sweatshirt and appreciation of a Kardashian helped move it into the 21st century, than with that of Ms. Waight Keller, who shifted Givenchy closer to its Hepburn roots, bridging then and now when she became the surprise designer of Meghan Markle’s wedding dress.

Though critically acclaimed for her couture, Ms. Waight Keller struggled to find a voice in ready-to-wear. Givenchy, once touted as the next billion dollar brand by Bernard Arnault, the chief executive of LVMH, never made the leap.

If Mr. Williams is the man to fulfill those goals in a world just emerging from the immediate effects of the coronavirus pandemic, which hit the luxury balance sheet hard and has raised questions over future consumer behavior, coupled now with a foreground of global unrest, is now the question.

The answer will be unveiled in October, when Mr. Williams makes his Givenchy debut in Paris.
 
Funny there’s no mention of couture on the Givenchy site but maybe it’s included in women’s.
 
Matthew's Givenchy is about to become the uglier, less-relevant-marching-band sister to Riccardo's older, hot-head-cheerleader sister everyone likes. So unfortunate, but not at all surprising.
 
As much as people might not like him, Givenchy really needs someone like him to shake things up. The matter of the fact is that CWK's Givenchy did not sell very well at all. Hopefully he can revive this struggling brand.

But see this is what I don’t get. Why does “shaking things up” have to mean conforming to the likes of Virgil or becoming a poor man’s Kim Jones? Are the LVMH Executives trying to make these men cannibalize each other by targeting the same market? I refuse to believe that most luxury brand’s consumers are desperate hypebeasts these days.
 
But see this is what I don’t get. Why does “shaking things up” have to mean conforming to the likes of Virgil or becoming a poor man’s Kim Jones? Are the LVMH Executives trying to make these men cannibalize each other by targeting the same market? I refuse to believe that most luxury brand’s consumers are desperate hypebeasts these days.
I agree that hypebeasts probably aren't the main luxury consumer of most luxury brands, however they are still part of the millennial/Gen Z group which is an undeniably important demographic. LVMH have seen success with Virgil and Kim at their respective mega houses, so it only makes sense that they'd go down a similar path for Givenchy.
 
This is probably a whole other conversation but they need to let this brand (along with many others) die. Is Matthew Williams, a creative director, SERIOUSLY going to design modern clothing through the lens of Hubert de Givenchy, a dressmaker? The prestige that comes with name of Givenchy, among many others, is just used to create crap for consumption. The fashion industry needs to stop riding on the coattails of great designers from the past. There are ways to continue the legacy of someone's work and I barely see anyone that cares to do so. It's disrespectful and blasphemous. I hate LVMH ugh
 
Also poor Matthew Williamson - everyone keeps reading his name at first. :lol:

LOL!

I do wonder if it was the wallpaper business that made him bow out because I'm actually a closet fan of his. S/S 1999 and A/W 1999.20 were two of his best. Hope we'll see a Chalayan-type resurgence at some point.
 
I agree that hypebeasts probably aren't the main luxury consumer of most luxury brands, however they are still part of the millennial/Gen Z group which is an undeniably important demographic. LVMH have seen success with Virgil and Kim at their respective mega houses, so it only makes sense that they'd go down a similar path for Givenchy.

This is what I want to know. Who are really buying RTW particularly mens? It might not be a major money maker but it provides a halo. Cool and desirable RTW merchandise would make Gen Z invested in a brand the same way Tisci’s Givenchy was. I have this hunch that with LV and Dior Men they are making a killing at RTW and in turn make their leather goods more desirable. I want to know if it far exceeds the number produced by traditional buyers. If that’s the case I could see why they got Matthew. Even just for subverted Givenchy logo t-shirts and sneakers.

It might be a balancing act with them already covering “traditional luxury” with their all womenswear designers and at this point for men you could say Hedi and KVA are traditional already. Apart from the handbags, does “traditional luxury” sell? Or maybe that market has reached its ceiling already thus this expansion to more non-traditional choices.
 
Last edited:
The other day I stumbled across one of Hubert de Givenchy last shows and I was in awe at the level of taste and sophistication of those clothes. Were they the trendiest? No, but they were flawless, this was the work of someone that had been taught by Cristóbal Balenciaga, someone who had mastered his craft. They were in a way, timeless.

The Alyx guy does things that are cool now but forgotten tomorrow, like so many of his contemporaries he's just a stylist, he cannot take full advantage of an atelier at his fingertips because there's never been a quest for excellence in his clothes and it shows.

Really, really sad. I already had a similar complaint regarding Demna's last show for Balenciaga: it's just disrespectful to keep a house as storied as that alive...just to sell sneakers, soccer shirts and other such crap. The Ferrero-Rocher dresses he did last spring were equally dumbfounding, is that how you're supposed to interpret the legacy and mystique of a master in the 21st century? If so, it's just not worth the effort.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,437
Messages
15,222,719
Members
87,323
Latest member
snsksjskwjsjsks
Back
Top