Xone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Messages
- 4,414
- Reaction score
- 2,735
Meaning?…It’s not him.
Meaning?…It’s not him.
meaning it’s not him.Meaning?…
also I LOVE I LOVE that Raf must be hysterical about Pieter and Matthieu being top contenders for Chanel and more relevant than him in the fashion conversation right now
Bernie isn't interested in fashion anymore: when he goes to Italy it's to buy top location real estate for his Cheval Blanc hotels in Venezia, Como and Firenze, but not anything fashion-related.Dior by Hedi MIGHT get me to forgive Bernie.
Bernie is basically only socially acceptable because of Hedi and NG. Without them he is a unscrupulous financier who thinks having bags made by slaves is smart management.
Without HS and NG Bernie has no aspirations of class. No legitimacy and no mandate.
As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!also I LOVE I LOVE that Raf must be hysterical about Pieter and Matthieu being top contenders for Chanel and more relevant than him in the fashion conversation right now
And Bernie just renegated on Venezia; someelse bought the Bauer hôtel he visited.Bernie isn't interested in fashion anymore: when he goes to Italy it's to buy top location real estate for his Cheval Blanc hotels in Venezia, Como and Firenze, but not anything fashion-related.
LOL, I have to recall what you all were talking about before realizing that there is no way it could be Bernie Sanders!Y'all calling him Bernie like he's a good old friend of yours lmaoo.
I still see a lot of people like his work for but it's overly intellectual and sometimes lacks heart and soul. His high-concept Americana failed to appeal to a broader consumer base. Also was a commercial disaster. The modern minimalism he found success with at Jil Sander didn't translate as well at Dior. Sure some insiders loved it, but it wasn't the same Dior that many fell in love with during the Galliano years. Sure Prada is doing well for now, that triangle definitely helps. But he doesn't have as distinct of a voice against Miuccia who is the heart and soul of the brand.As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!
Maybe because after his glorious days at his own brand and a fabulous tenure at Jil Sander, it became quite apparent that he owed those success to his number 2.As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!