Tbh, I was like that as well, having a passion for fashion since I was like 0 and I basically think about it 24h out of 24, but that never made me a b!tch with people. In fashion most of the people working are gay guys with big traumas in their backs (which is normal), but most of them didn’t know how to manage their frustrations and pay it with the people around… I see that a lot. People that were bullied, once they feel “respected” they can be the worst human beings ever. Out of their fields they are still that bullied kid though…
In management many people are straight, fashion is just a job for them, they dont really care about it, they have other issues… although sometimes there are, like everywhere, very silly people with lots of ambition, and someone silly with ambition is a terrible combo as well.
I agree.
That being said I made a general statement and I’m not sure why it’s being discussed on Blazy’s thread because I have only heard fabulous things about him. The same for Lee despite his behavior, he wasn’t ever described as a terrible person (some personalities mesh more than others).
I think for years and for the bad reasons, being mean was seen as having a strong personality. And in fashion there’s sometimes this blur between being mean, being tough and being demanding.
And yes, there’s this attitude from men in fashion that can be mean girl-ish, very highschool that is also encouraged by « Le théâtre de la mode ». And those are the same persons who worship diva behaviors from models and editors.
But tbh, what I have always found fascinating was that, it was rarely ever the designer but more the design assistants.
I think about a designer who worked in the studio of a very very important designer. There were stories that he was quite mean. It turned out that he was mean to a young assistant who was supported by the very important designer/CD.
The irony is that the assistant is forgotten today while the assistant is a very successful jewelry and accessories designer.
So Karma works against some people lol.
Karl would say something like "oh you have nothing to do that you have to think about me? Its been years, you need to find other things to do" and he would judge us and think we are boring.
The sight of Raf Simons in this context sets my blood to a simmering boil.
From what we have discerned, he wont have responsibility for models, photographers, campaigns, or scenography. Lena has or intends to appoint individuals to oversee each aspect of these endeavors. Chanel shall evolve into a well-structured bureaucracy, ensuring the brand's preservation during this extended transitional era. Lena is going to make it almost impossible to create pieces that do not adhere to Chanel's code.
He will have the responsibility for all those things.
At Chanel, a lot of things are internal anyway from the Casting Director to the Set designer. The fashion side has it own Art direction and things like that.
So yes, Matthieu Blazy will be responsible to everything fashion at Chanel from the moment he officially takes his position. And his power will grow after renewal and with the whole generational change too.
And once again, you are giving too much power to Leena Nair. Blazy will work closely with Pavlovsky who btw has a personal relationship with Weirthemer.
And Chanel has others entities and others issues that Nair has to handle besides the CD of fashion. The CD of the Jewelry operation died last month for example. A more permanent situation has to be handle for the beauty side even more with Simona Cattaneo taking over soon…