Creative
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 5,256
- Reaction score
- 3,345
You don’t need to be in any crowd to see that, just open instagram and you’ll see it.Okay… not to sound like MGC… but I’m still missing it. I mean, I guess it’s all about geolocation, when I see women with 2.55s they aren’t those women, because I’m not into that crowd (not to reveal that I’m not a 1%er on tfs). I shouldn’t say it but there’s something so annoyingly pretentious about mostly male users describing the sh*tty ways they think women dress on tFS constantly lately. 👀 I get it, we should dress to please you. 🫢🙏
I mean, just save yourself the time and say it’s tacky because lots of women own it.
Edit: and you have the inverse of this going on in the Phoebe Philo thread where those women are FAKE INTELLECTUALS 😱
And yes, usually women dress to please males (or females) and males usually dress to please females. Dressing is a social thing. People who think that dress for themselves are just delusional. The same kind of people that would post “just got my hair cut” and then post a a booty pic, or the same kind of people that post a nude and say “it took me so much time to love myself”. Girl/boy, you just need attention and it’s fair!
And I am not saying how they should dress, I’m just describing what Instagram pr*stitutes usually look like and wear. And the Chanel 2.55 and the Boy are usually in those pics, and imo it’s great they rose the prices cause they would stay a little bit more away from them. They will go for the Satin Lady Dior or the Vernis one again 💅