Miss Dalloway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
- Messages
- 25,698
- Reaction score
- 1,005
^ Yes, and that he defo did not shoot the cover. Man!


^^ Yes Fei Fei was supposed to be used, but i dont know, its a strange tale to me. Why would Sozzani be so upset? He shot for others before? Maybe not the same theme, but come on! It seems a classic tale of Fashion Ego, one refusing to be put under "exclusive", and to chose, and the other being offended. Meisel most likely wanted both. No idea what this means long term, but if she went with another Photog for the cover, the relationship is broken. Maybe it means more Meisel for US Vogue?
New VI better drop soon!

Purely speculating here, I'm sure this has everything to do with Fei Fei and the setting we saw in US Vogue. We all know Meisel can at times duplicate his editorial themes (VI August 11 vs W September 11/VI August 14 vs Moschino Toy). Perhaps Franca wanted to prevent having to deal with a similar situation? How can she save face when her cover looks like a secondary US Vogue's edit, from the previous month?
Meisel for US Vogue might appeal to many, but Anna will never grant him the same degree of liberty he gets at VI. Can you imagine the BP oil spill edit in US Vogue? Never. And yet it's almost a work of art.
Surely there must be some form of contract in place, which would mean we'll still see him from July onwards? My absolute nightmare would be Steven Klein as Meisel's replacement.
God, I've never been so anxious to see VI!!![]()


Really? Ugh!!! It might mean they are shooting for an upcoming cover story if all of this turns out to be true!^ M&M, Edward, and Franca were all in Instanbul recently could they have working on something?
