Nadège Vanhee-Cybulski - Designer, Creative Director of Hermès | the Fashion Spot

Nadège Vanhee-Cybulski - Designer, Creative Director of Hermès

TheoG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,705
Reaction score
281
I'm eager to see this, hopefully she is able to differentiate herself from The Row abit and all of the other brands she has worked for in the past. But still continue the quality of Hermès.

Anticipating Nadège Vanhee-Cybulski’s Debut at Hermès

Tomorrow afternoon the world will meet a new Hermès, courtesy of creative director Nadège Vanhee-Cybulski—but that’s not all, it will also meet a new design talent. After holding lead design positions at The Row, from 2011 to 2014, and Céline, from 2008 to 2011, Vanhee-Cybulski’s first outing as the major creative force behind a collection will happen at Hermès and on the international stage. No pressure.

If her résumé is telling, she will bring a sense of refined, understated elegance to the French house, not unlike that of her predecessor Christophe Lemaire, who helmed the house from 2010 to 2014. What Vanhee-Cybulski is also likely to deliver, though, is a sense of the shocking, something that Hermès has lacked since the days of Jean Paul Gaultier’s or Martin Margiela’s reigns, from 2003 to 2010, and 1997 to 2003, respectively. From her time at Céline, The Row, and Maison Martin Margiela before that, Vanhee-Cybulski has surely learned that true luxury doesn’t just mean fancy materials; it means subversion. Phoebe Philo nails it season after season at Céline, with her fur-lined Birkenstocks, boob-print sneakers, and this Fall’s Mary Poppins-sized purses. Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen got the hang of it at The Row, too—really, what’s more perversive than an ostrich-skin backpack?

The house of Hermès, long synonymous with the utmost in luxury, could benefit from a little shot in the arm. And while many read Vanhee-Cybulski’s appointment as a safe choice, a Frenchwoman returning to a French house, she has the opportunity to invigorate the label with a smart take on femininity that her male predecessors lacked. Look around the Hermès website or its stores and you’ll find a sense of fun, of subversion, and of the unexpected—it is the house with bags named after both the eternal ingenue Jane Birkin and the original princess with an edge Grace Kelly, after all. Let’s see if Vanhee-Cybulski brings some of that complex beauty back with her debut collection tomorrow. ​​
style.com
 
Nadège Vanhée on Her First 10 Years at Hermès: “I Never Look Back”
BY NICOLE PHELPS

Nadège Vanhée left New York for Paris 10 years ago. She was a design director at The Row when Hermès called with the kind of offer you don’t say no to: the artistic director of women’s ready-to-wear. A decade later, though, the city still has its hooks in the French designer—once a New Yorker, always a New Yorker, as they say.

This week Vanhée is back in town to present a new collection—not resort, to be clear, but a sort of part-two of the fall collection she showed in February. “I have a special connection with New York,” Vanhée said at a makeshift studio on the west side, and “when I did this second chapter I felt it was relevant to show it here because it’s the perfect blend between a French and an American girl.”

The fall show—part one—was dedicated to horses and motorbikes, and it was the sexiest show of her Hermès tenure: lots of fitted leather and flashes of race car red. Tonight’s show isn’t an anniversary collection; still, her New York visit was cause for reflection. “I remember when I met Axel [Dumas, the executive chairman of Hermès], I said I really want to make the coat as relevant as the Birkin bag, and I think today we have customers who really discover the brand through the ready-to-wear, and that’s something which is quite exciting.” She took a break from fitting that ready-to-wear to talk mentors, the women role models who’ve led Hermès in the past, and how she maintains the house’s “attractive aura.”

I wanted to go to a house with really strong roots, which had strong stability. It was important for me; working for The Row, working for Celine, we were really at the beginning of something. I had to give a lot, because they were really starting their DNA. There was a strange feeling of going back to something familiar but at the same time super distant to me, because I hadn’t been there in years.

On what she learned at her jobs pre-Hermès:

Mary-Kate and Ashley? The sky’s the limit, the studio was very young and they showed me that if you want to do it, you do it. Especially coming from France where everything is ‘not possible’, it was nice to have the freedom of trying. Celine: the quest of working on a very strong assertive woman. I think what I learned from Martin, I remember one of our first meetings and he was like, [scoffs], ‘those archives.’ And I was like, ‘come on, Martin…’ and he said: ‘I don’t want to see anything from previous collections.’ And I think this has been imprinted on me: you look ahead, but you don’t ignore what you did and you also don’t give up your ideas.

On the designers who preceded her at Hermès:

Jean Paul Gaultier had a lot of freedom at the house. He was really experimental, he tried to expand the scope of the silhouette while still playing with ideas like fetishism. Martin Margiela before Gaultier was a sort of chiropractor or osteopath. The house had gone in every direction and he really helped to consolidate the fundamentals. And with Christophe Lemaire [her immediate predecessor], I didn’t want to look too much. Lemaire, Gaultier, and Margiela—they really brought their brand to the house and I really wanted to be more like a searcher. For me it was easier to go back to the first silhouettes that were designed in the ’20s and ’30s, and the work of Lola Prusac and Catherine de Karolyi. I naturally looked more toward the women who designed for Hermès. When you flick through the archives, lots of women have given a strong imprint to the house, even though the first clothes designed for women were men’s adaptations.

On being a woman designer:

Gender is tricky. When you’re a writer, you can write a female character if you’re male. I always get annoyed when we have to justify. It was Rebecca Solnit [the author of Men Explain Things to Me] who said that too: why do we have to justify anything? Yes, equality is great, but it doesn’t make me a better designer because I’m female. I do see this conversation about women designers happening. But women voting was like what 80 years ago [in France]. I mean, women having bank accounts in France only happened in the ’70s. What I see in fashion is just a reflection of that. There is a lot more to do.

On function over form:

The house is really about transmission. You acquire something and know you’re going to wear it and know you’re going to transmit to your children. There’s also this idea of anchor. People feel this is a stable object. I see lots of models, and they walk in with a vintage shirt from Hermès, and they say, ‘oh, I bought it in a vintage store,’ or ‘I got that scarf from my mom’ and they recontextualize it. There’s this Hermès motto: designing objects that really help the user everyday, this concept of being functional. And I think when you think about functionality, you’re always relevant.

On never looking back:

I don’t look back. I like to look ahead. There’s always things that we haven’t resolved and you push them further. Over these 10 years, you can definitely see an evolution in the silhouette. It has sharpened, but it’s playful and quite empathic. There’s a lot of different women who are quite fond of the collection and you put them in a room and they don’t look alike.

On what today’s show resolves:

It’s really the styling, the connection with the different metiers of the house: the jewelers, the accessoires, the hat, the scarf. We have different creative directors: Clémande [Burgevin Blachma, Fashion Accessories], and of course Pierre Hardy [Artistic Director of the shoe and jewelry collections]. There’s this great synergy. It’s not just the ready-to-wear. It’s a very interesting moment for Hermès, I think we have the right people at the right place.

Source: Vogue.com
 
« You worked with Martin Margiela known for his tabi shoes »… Really girl? You couldn’t have found something more note-worthy?
 
i like she is talking and seams more lose and at ease, i understood she is a bit all over the place and difficult but i feel she matured seeing her talk like this ........i just hope she bring more ease into her work its just to overtly controlled to point of suffocation and rigidity try hard.
 
So according to the accompanying WSJ article she is indeed preparing for the relaunch of haute couture…
 
WSJ
INSIDE THE MOST exclusive house of luxury, a fashion designer is comparing her work to one of the most stressful jobs on the planet.

We’re sitting in the Hermès offices on the outskirts of Paris in the month before Fashion Week, and Nadège Vanhée, artistic director of the company’s women’s ready-to-wear métier, is explaining her approach to the glamorous job she’s held for more than a decade. I figure she might identify as an artist, or perhaps some word so outrageously French that it comes with an espresso and cigarette. But that’s not how Vanhée describes her role. She thinks of herself as an air-traffic controller.

In her serene office looking down on a courtyard garden, as she sips tea from an Hermès cup and saucer, she interrupts herself to acknowledge that putting clothes on the runway is not exactly the same as navigating chaos in the sky.

“It’s fashion,” Vanhée says. “It’s not making sure that planes are safe.”

But to do the job well requires focus, calm under pressure, attention to detail amid a crush of distractions and making decisions about what’s in front of her while looking over the horizon for what’s ahead. In that sense, her office might as well be a control tower.

Nadège Vanhée, artistic director of the Hermès’s women’s ready-to-wear métier, is preparing to relaunch a line of haute couture, which the brand hasn’t produced since the 1960s.
Nadège Vanhée, artistic director of the Hermès’s women’s ready-to-wear métier, is preparing to relaunch a line of haute couture, which the brand hasn’t produced since the 1960s.
I mention this comparison to Pierre-Alexis Dumas, artistic director of the whole company and a sixth-generation member of its ruling family. He’s in charge of the creative process across a house known for its craftsmanship, exquisite technique and savoir faire, the specialized knowledge that has been preserved for centuries—first applied to saddles and harnesses, now to women’s and men’s clothing, ties, scarves, belts, shoes, jewelry, furniture, perfume, makeup, watches, headphones, chess sets, stuffed animals and handbags so coveted they have become an economy unto themselves. At Hermès, there are 16 métiers, from leather goods and equestrian to home and beauty, and their leaders all report to Dumas.

His eyes light up when he learns that one of the company’s stars relates to clearing air traffic.

“My father used to say that if you want to pronounce Hermès correctly, think of a traffic jam in the air,” he says. “Air mess.”


These days, Hermès has soared to a rarefied place in the luxury stratosphere. The business founded in 1837 is a global empire built on leather, silk and cashmere that has become one of the most valuable companies in the world.

Hermès achieved this success by operating unlike the rest of the industry. As conglomerates LVMH and Kering swallow up European brands, Hermès is the rare family-run company that has remained independent. Its signature product is a handbag methodically saddle-stitched by a single person from start to finish. In the age of artificial intelligence, the Dumas family is still betting on artisanship. This strategy of growing through scarcity, not scale, is nothing less than rebellious.

The specialized craftsmanship and technique that was first applied to saddles and harnesses now goes into women’s and men’s clothing, scarves, shoes, furniture, makeup, watches, record players, sporting equipment and handbags so coveted they have become an economy unto themselves.
The specialized craftsmanship and technique that was first applied to saddles and harnesses now goes into women’s and men’s clothing, scarves, shoes, furniture, makeup, watches, record players, sporting equipment and handbags so coveted they have become an economy unto themselves. Hermès
Back in her office, Vanhée reveals that she has been working on something radical herself.

In addition to the ruthless pressure of putting collections on the runway season after season, she is now preparing to relaunch a line of haute couture, which Hermès hasn’t produced since the 1960s. The exalted segment of made-to-order fashion is famously difficult to crack. It comes with specific rules, like mandating at least 20 full-time technical employees. And by getting back into extravagantly customized gowns, which might cost as much as a car, Hermès will be competing with houses like Chanel and Dior in the couture market.

Vanhée says she’s up for the challenge. She points out that some ready-to-wear garments in her recent collections have already introduced couture-like embellishments. While her first collection isn’t coming anytime soon, she gives me a sneak preview of her thought process. She already knows that her couture will reflect the identity of the house, which means there will be plenty of leather and she intends for it to be worn. “It’s not going to be museum pieces,” she promises.

By constantly reinventing itself, Hermès has proven remarkably durable. Over the years, the company has survived wars, recessions, pandemics, cars replacing horses and even a battle with a man known as the wolf in cashmere. When LVMH’s billionaire chairman Bernard Arnault disclosed owning a huge stake in Hermès in 2010, which Hermès viewed as a hostile takeover attempt, his company dwarfed its rival. It still did even after their war ended with a truce in 2014. But this year, Hermès’s market capitalization surpassed LVMH’s for the first time, and it was the most valuable company in luxury—a single brand suddenly worth more than a fortress portfolio of 75 brands.

“It was like an eclipse,” Dumas says. “I could not believe it with my eyes.”

Just like an actual eclipse, it didn’t last very long. But the metric Dumas says he cares about most is not strictly financial. The questions that keep him up at night are the philosophical ones.

“Is what we’re producing desirable?” he says. “Is it meaningful?”

Of course, the more desirable a luxury brand is, the more product it sells. But as it sells more products, any luxury brand risks becoming less desirable. To explain how a 188-year-old company has navigated this paradox—how Hermès has remained so defiantly Hermès—Dumas cites another one. “You have to change all the time,” he says, “to remain the same.”

HEN NAD`EGE VANH´EE got the offer to design for Hermès in 2014, she immediately thought of The Godfather and knew she could not refuse. Vanhée, 47, who grew up in northern France, had studied fashion design in Belgium and kept a low profile as she worked for Maison Martin Margiela, for Céline under Phoebe Philo and then at Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen’s label, The Row. She wasn’t looking for another job and wasn’t expecting to be courted by a house of luxury, much less the house of luxury: “I never said: One day, Hermès.”

Then, one day, Hermès called. Hermès! She had always revered the brand, even if she was not the most obvious candidate for the job. Yes, she had an Hermès scarf that she’d inherited from her mother and a bracelet her father had given her when she turned 18. But she hadn’t actually bought anything from Hermès before she was hired to work there.

Until that moment, she had felt like an outsider for most of her life. As a child, she was ostracized because of her striking red hair and told she couldn’t wear red clothing. (Today she collects red dresses.) But when she met with Axel Dumas, the chief executive of Hermès and Pierre-Alexis’s cousin, she realized she would be right at home. “He likes the outsider,” she says.

When she started as the creative force behind women’s ready-to-wear, she felt it was vital to understand the psychology of Hermès. She dug through equestrian catalogs in the archives. She soaked up the wisdom of highly trained artisans in the company’s ateliers. In a leather workshop where they work their magic on her garments, there’s a wall of handwritten thank-you notes from Vanhée that accompany the bouquets she sends them after every show. Her investigation into all things Hermès led her to a crucial insight. “Leather is the consciousness of the house,” she says, “and silk is the subconsciousness.”

As she came up in fashion, Vanhée wasn’t expecting to be courted by the most exclusive house of luxury. ‘I never said: One day, Hermès.’
As she came up in fashion, Vanhée wasn’t expecting to be courted by the most exclusive house of luxury. ‘I never said: One day, Hermès.’
One thing that surprised her during this education was the house’s very serious commitment to not taking itself too seriously. From skiing penguins on men’s silk ties to the meticulously curated vibe of its retail stores, the brand is less pretentious than playful—even whimsical. (A few years ago, for example, the window display at the company’s flagship store in Paris featured a tasteful pile of horse poop.) That whimsy suited Vanhée, who carries an E.T. charm on her key chain and flaunts a chihuahua sticker from her 6-year-old daughter on the back of her phone.

The more she learned about Hermès, the more she understood that the house’s priorities were the same in every métier, including hers. The nature of fashion might seem antithetical to a brand that stands for timelessness. But her clothing isn’t meant to go out of style by next season. It’s designed to last forever. A collection must be ready to wear now—and decades from now. It needs to honor the company’s heritage without being nostalgic for its history.

“Nostalgia is connected with this idea that it was better before—a certain kind of sadness, a feeling of inadequacy with today,” Vanhée says. “Heritage is about embracing the present.”

To embrace the present, she toys with the company’s past, taking its equestrian roots and twisting them as she recasts silhouettes, repurposes leather and silk and reimagines jackets, vests and Hermès archetypes for women today.

For Vanhée, photographed here in 2020, a collection must be ready to wear now—and decades from now. It needs to honor Hermès’s heritage without being nostalgic for its history.
For Vanhée, photographed here in 2020, a collection must be ready to wear now—and decades from now. It needs to honor Hermès’s heritage without being nostalgic for its history. Getty Images
On the day we meet at the company’s design studios in the Parisian suburb of Pantin, where even the trash bins are mottled with horse iconography, Vanhée is dressed in all black. The only Hermès she’s wearing happens to be the first Hermès she bought, a pair of boots designed by Pierre Hardy, creative director for jewelry, shoes and beauty objects, who has been with the company since 1990. Along the way, he learned that creative autonomy inside Hermès comes from the sturdy foundation of a house secure in its identity. “We’re dancing on a platform that is in stone,” he says.

The pirouette into couture will be Vanhée’s latest chance to revive the company’s past—a concept as quintessentially Hermès as its orange box. That morning, she breezes into her studio, past her moodboards and bookshelf with neatly organized binders of fabric, on her way to a meeting with Priscila Alexandre Spring. As the creative director of leather goods, Alexandre Spring is responsible for tweaking iconic handbags like the Birkin and Kelly while coming up with ideas that one day might join them in the canon.

Before the two women get to work, they compare notes on balancing old and new.

“We are very classic with the novelties,” Alexandre Spring says. “We try to be less classic with the classics.”

The classic orange Hermès box, playfully repurposed, near the company’s flagship store in Paris.
The classic orange Hermès box, playfully repurposed, near the company’s flagship store in Paris.
PIERRE-ALEXIS DUMAS works out of an unmarked building on a quiet street in Paris just around the corner from the Hermès flagship store. On a tour of his impeccably decorated office filled with company artifacts, he shows me a baseball signed by Jony Ive, Apple’s former design guru, who worked closely with Hermès on straps for the Apple Watch. Then he opens a cabinet, grabs a hidden box of leather treasures and pulls out a wallet, the first object he made for himself while learning the company’s vaunted saddle-stitch as a child. These days, he signs off on every product that Hermès sells, personally inspecting thousands of designs each year to make sure they meet the company’s exacting standards. “I have to,” he says. “This is the family name.”

That family name has never been more valuable. The peculiar economics of scarcity has created a wildly profitable business. There is so much demand for handmade bags like the Birkin and they are in such limited supply that Hermès clients sometimes wait years before they are invited by a sales associate for the privilege of buying one.

Even so, during our conversation, Dumas reaches for an oddly shaped leather object—the Hermès equivalent of a stress ball. “I’ll tell you what is stressful, but it’s good stress,” he says. “It’s thinking about Hermès.”

Jane Birkin with her iconic namesake Hermès bag, Today Birkin bags are in such limited supply that the brand’s clients sometimes wait years before they are invited by a sales associate for the privilege of buying one.
Jane Birkin with her iconic namesake Hermès bag, Today Birkin bags are in such limited supply that the brand’s clients sometimes wait years before they are invited by a sales associate for the privilege of buying one. Mike Daines/Shutterstock
Nobody has thought more about Hermès than Dumas, 59, who traces the history of women’s clothing at the company back to its founder. When Thierry Hermès opened his first workshop, his harnesses were known for two things. “They were extremely discreet,” Dumas says, “and they revealed the natural beauty of the horse.” In the early days, Hermès dressed clients with four legs. But those principles apply to Vanhée’s clothing, which is meant to be understated, flattering and emboldening.

The famous origin story of women’s ready-to-wear at the company involves a female customer declaring that her horse was better-dressed than she was. Et voilà—Hermès began dressing humans, too. Dumas tells me another version that stars his great-grandfather, Émile Hermès, whose four children (all daughters) inspired a women’s line in the 1920s. Either way, the first official women’s ready-to-wear collection wasn’t presented until the 1960s. In the 1970s, Pierre-Alexis’s father took over from his grandfather and set about diversifying the family business. And in the 1990s and 2000s, the fashion division got a makeover when a series of subversive creative directors, like Martin Margiela and Jean Paul Gaultier, rebranded Hermès “from horsey to hip,” as one fashion critic put it.

But as the line evolved, the company went looking for someone who could make horsey hip—that is, an Hermès designer, rather than a designer for Hermès.

At other houses, creative directors transcend their brands. But at Hermès, the house is bigger than any of its inhabitants. “It’s through our work that we elevate ourselves,” Dumas says. “Joining Hermès is deciding to serve something greater than yourself, accepting that, and then very joyfully sharing that success.”

To explain how Hermès has remained so defiantly Hermès, Pierre-Alexis Dumas cites a paradox.  ‘You have to change all the time,’ he says, ‘to remain the same.’
To explain how Hermès has remained so defiantly Hermès, Pierre-Alexis Dumas cites a paradox. ‘You have to change all the time,’ he says, ‘to remain the same.’
Vanhée’s métier is successful in more ways than one. It opens a door for shoppers to enter the universe of Hermès, which makes it essential strategically. It’s also important financially. The ready-to-wear and accessories division accounted for 22% of the company’s sales when she started and accounts for 29% today, making it one of the fastest-growing parts of the business. But to Dumas, what really matters is that Vanhée’s work resonates creatively. “She absorbed what Hermès is about,” he says. “She picked up the dream of Émile Hermès and brought it much further.”

While creative directors bounce around, the ones anointed by Hermès tend to stick around. When Véronique Nichanian recently stepped down as the company’s head of menswear, it was after a reign of 37 years. Vanhée might have that sort of longevity.

At this point, she has done the job longer than any of the men who came before her. “It’s really something that I hope I can do for a long time without boring anyone,” Vanhée says. She also has the confidence to do it in her own way. As fashion designers overshare on Instagram to cultivate their personal brands, she looks at social media but never posts. “It’s not my job,” Vanhée says. As it turns out, a tastemaker does not have to be an influencer. She has the luxury of expressing herself through her work for Hermès.
“I profit from the great sympathy of Hermès,” she says. “You say Hermès, and some people will say, Can I get 20% off? And all the others say, Oh, my God—Hermès.”

THIS HAS NOT BEEN a particularly luxurious year for the luxury industry, which has been dealing with the uncertainty of tariffs, softening global demand and the constant threat of forgeries and cheap knockoffs—which for Hermès includes the Wirkin, a Birkin dupe from Walmart. Meanwhile, a dizzying game of musical chairs left more than a dozen houses scrambling to hire new creative directors this season.

The turbulence hasn’t shaken Hermès. This palace of opulence continues to seduce new generations of shoppers while Very Important Clients keep splurging on crocodile Birkins. Last year, Hermès reported a record $15.8 billion in sales, and the company’s market cap typically floats between $250 billion and $300 billion. That means Hermès brings in less annual revenue than Mercedes-Benz, Target, Adidas, Ford, Delta Airlines or Michelin individually, but it’s worth more than all of those companies put together.

Hermès is bigger than any of its individual inhabitants. ‘It’s through our work that we elevate ourselves,’ Dumas says. ‘Joining Hermès is deciding to serve something greater than yourself, accepting that, and then very joyfully sharing that success.’
Hermès is bigger than any of its individual inhabitants. ‘It’s through our work that we elevate ourselves,’ Dumas says. ‘Joining Hermès is deciding to serve something greater than yourself, accepting that, and then very joyfully sharing that success.’
As we discuss the company’s resilience, Dumas brings the conversation back to his touchstones.

“What does it mean to be desirable today?” he says. “The true meaning of desire is not instant gratification. The true meaning of desire is to find something that gives meaning to your life.”

Dumas believes the quest for meaning will be the guiding force of the modern age. When consumers buy something, he says, they want to know where it’s made, how it’s made, who made it—the human craft behind the product. “That’s what Nadège does. That’s what all the people who work at Hermès have understood,” he says. “They’re working on helping us be in touch with ourselves.”

All of which explains why he looks offended when I ask if he’s using AI. I might as well have asked if he spent August at the office.

“No,” he says. “Why?”

Does he think a machine could saddle-stitch a handbag like the ones made by Hermès artisans?

“Never.”

Why?

“It’s all about the human touch. Yes, you can program a machine. But what the machine doesn’t have is feelings. It doesn’t have consciousness. It’s not aware of what it’s doing. It’s just doing what it’s supposed to do.”

But if a machine could do everything humans can, would he use it?

He doesn’t need an Hermès stress ball to think about this question. For all the changes in his family’s business, the answer has always been the same.

“You’re talking to someone working for a company with over 7,000 craftsmen,” Dumas says. “No. I would not do it. Over my dead body.”

All featured fashion by Hermès. Header video: Romain Wygas for WSJ. Magazine; models, Anouk Smits at Platform Agency and Nataly Vieira at IMG Models; makeup, Tatsu Yamanaka; hair, Christian Eberhard; manicure, Beatrice Eni; set design, Stuart McCaffer; production, DoBeDo Represents and Mercenary Paris.

Writen by [email protected]
 
"Quiet luxury is boring!" says the designer who makes walking leather barbiturates each season.

Also, she needs to sleep. In that cover she looks like she hasn´t slept for a week...
 
"Quiet luxury is boring!" says the designer who makes walking leather barbiturates each season.

Also, she needs to sleep. In that cover she looks like she hasn´t slept for a week...
i understood she is a nervous type in the studio so it can make sense the no sleep lol

she really needs to loosen up and stop making saddles disguised as clothes for woman ...make a draped leather blouse with out 10 different reinforced seams inserts as start lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top