each nude girl is sexual. though it is photographed in an artistic way. what does that mean "artistic"? where is the border? peter lindberghs photographs are artistic. but they are sexual. what you mean is artistic=tasteful how do you exlain artistic? black/white?
Nudity
- Thread starter missy-t1
- Start date
cocomonkey4
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 443
- Reaction score
- 0
oh c'mon, i love kate but her nudes can not be considered that classy. half of the nudes she does is no better if not worse that the ones gisele does. It's just Gisele has bigger boobs and is a victoria secret's model and thus has more of a sex vixen persona. Kate has that waify boyish look, flat chest and so people thinks the stuff kate does is art or classy. c'mon!Marcella said:
cocomonkey4
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 443
- Reaction score
- 0
^ well, she's a high fashion model(not a nude model) on the catwalk to model CLOTHES, not show her boobs off.
ModernLove7
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 521
- Reaction score
- 0
Ana Hickman
sapphireskies
Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 1
She reminds me of Charlize Theron.
ModernLove7
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 521
- Reaction score
- 0
more Ana Hickman's Pics
I have nothing against nudity and anyone who doesn't think that most models have posed nude or semi-nude at one time or another is living in La La land. It's a part of the business. I also think this thread is moving away from it's original intent of asking if models pose nude into a "lets post pictures and see how far we can push this before someone calls a halt." thread. If thats the case then it will be deleted.
I'd call this implied nudity
Some pretty sexual content I'd say!
This is what Gisele says about posing nude. Its from an interview in Rolling Stone magazine in 2000:
Indeed, it's that body that really sets her apart - specifically, her breasts. Those breasts of hers have been credited with putting an end to the miserable reign of modestly endowed waifs like Kate Moss. Consequently, they're also said to have ushered in the Return of the Sexy Model, as Vogue put it on a recent cover deeply illuminated by Gisele. They are, in other words, a sensation (one fashion writer dubbed them "global superstars''), though not a sensation that anyone but Gisele's intimates will ever get to see in their entirety, because Gisele, it seems, is not that kind of model.
"I don't wear transparent," she likes to say. "If the designers ask me to wear see-through, I say no. I simply won't do it. I don't feel comfortable about people seeing my nipples."
foxinthesnow
Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2003
- Messages
- 561
- Reaction score
- 0
marcella said:
The idea that Kate's nudes are somehow "classy" might be used to make the point of certain model fans who feel that after Kate moss it was all downhill for the 'real;beauties and - namely- for sensuality. Somehow anything even remotely sensual has become muddled with tacky and trashy and/or brazen in your face sexuality. Those two are not one in the same... Not necessarily an opinion I hold myself (to that extent). I think the high point to kate's nudes was the fact that the memorables ones were by mario sorrenti, anyone would look as good (see: marina perez this issue v men).
I don't think the point of this thread is to post explict sexual or nude images. I personally have nothing agains models posing nude and/or in a sexual manner as long as they are compfortable w/ it. As I understand it it is a reality of the buisness. The pictures that I've posted of Gisele are there to illustrate the point that she does pose nude but says she doesn't. I think by doing so she's saying that there is something wrong w/ nudity (even though she does it) and is kind of hypocritical. As for the debate b/t classy and trashy/ art and p*rn- we could discuss this forever and get nowhere. IMO, the definition lies in the eye of the beholder.
verity
giseles hundreds of nude pictures put the lie to her claims.
likewise her boobs are fake, dont believe a word she says.
every model has to pose nude, its part of the job.
very few models are ever exceptions to that rule.
nudity is fine. gisele has done some nice nudes & kate moss has too.
kates chuck close & lucien freud images are as successful as sorrenti's.
everything is aesthetic subjectivity.
ana hickman looks dumb with her hand in her bikini bottom.
her 'heaven awaits' tattoo is even dumber. shes a fake brazilian commercial boob model. she also cannot get arrested in 2005.
some of giseles nudes are almost as stupid [the gynocological exam] but others are ok ['the face' by lachapelle with makeshift bikini bottom]
shes posed nude hundreds of times, dont believe a word out of her mouth.
giseles hundreds of nude pictures put the lie to her claims.
likewise her boobs are fake, dont believe a word she says.
every model has to pose nude, its part of the job.
very few models are ever exceptions to that rule.
nudity is fine. gisele has done some nice nudes & kate moss has too.
kates chuck close & lucien freud images are as successful as sorrenti's.
everything is aesthetic subjectivity.
ana hickman looks dumb with her hand in her bikini bottom.
her 'heaven awaits' tattoo is even dumber. shes a fake brazilian commercial boob model. she also cannot get arrested in 2005.
some of giseles nudes are almost as stupid [the gynocological exam] but others are ok ['the face' by lachapelle with makeshift bikini bottom]
shes posed nude hundreds of times, dont believe a word out of her mouth.
What gyno exam? I know she's done a lot of nudes but I've never seen that one. Is it from an editorial?lady grey said:giseles hundreds of nude pictures put the lie to her claims.
likewise her boobs are fake, dont believe a word she says.
every model has to pose nude, its part of the job.
very few models are ever exceptions to that rule.
nudity is fine. gisele has done some nice nudes & kate moss has too.
kates chuck close & lucien freud images are as successful as sorrenti's.
everything is aesthetic subjectivity.
ana hickman looks dumb with her hand in her bikini bottom.
her 'heaven awaits' tattoo is even dumber. shes a fake brazilian commercial boob model. she also cannot get arrested in 2005.
some of giseles nudes are almost as stupid [the gynocological exam] but others are ok ['the face' by lachapelle with makeshift bikini bottom]
shes posed nude hundreds of times, dont believe a word out of her mouth.
gis gyn
shes on her back with her legs spread up in the air. its on the previous page.
it looks like lachapelle.
theres a 2nd version with a crowd of men looking at her under glass in the sam,e pose.
it suggests a museum exhibit, a science lesson, or a peep show.
shes on her back with her legs spread up in the air. its on the previous page.
it looks like lachapelle.
theres a 2nd version with a crowd of men looking at her under glass in the sam,e pose.
it suggests a museum exhibit, a science lesson, or a peep show.
C
Cammy
Guest
That ana hickman looks hideously tacky
gemma
the reality is that you show your boobs though it is a clothes not a nude model. the catwalk is presenting and always have a lot to do with sex as such. and if gemma is presented in this way with her child breasts it is not very tasteful. why she is a high fashion model i cant believe...
cocomonkey4 said:
the reality is that you show your boobs though it is a clothes not a nude model. the catwalk is presenting and always have a lot to do with sex as such. and if gemma is presented in this way with her child breasts it is not very tasteful. why she is a high fashion model i cant believe...
