LadyJunon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 3,959
- Reaction score
- 7,949
You have too much faith in this guy!
He’s already made that iconic velvet suit so annoying. He hasn’t proven nor shows the potential to offer a fashion moment. The time to have done so would have been during his debut. And all he’s shown is that he’s capable of a meek revision of Tom’s signature looks— on a cast of kidz with no presence, like every other brand out there. Absolutely no distinction. I’ve mentioned this before, but the branding is very much awkward super rich kidz raiding their much cooler parents’ wardrobe and failing to convince anyone that they’re as cool as their parents. When Tom debuted under his own name, the cast of confident women of superstars, legendary models and not meek girls in his reliable Gucci/YSL signatures with a slight vintagey vibe was all that was needed for a fashion moment without even trying.
The S/S campaign is a tepid step in the right direction. But again, the casting simply drags it back a few steps. A more mature cast instead of banal children would have elevated the imagery. The kidz whom are drawn to the brand will come whether you desperately pander to them or not. And showing respect to the reliant older customer whom have always supported the brand, whom have grown up with his Gucci/YSL/Tom Ford by casting older models— whether vets or newer older faces, would give the brand a timeless and authentic heritage— and still be able to snatch that 2 billion projection.
The casting for the show and campaign were quite good by today's standards, but I do agree that Tom Ford would benefit from casting older models from the Gucci/YSL era, imagine a show with Werbowy, Omahyra, Mariaclara, Kebede, Supernova. I imagine that it would be harder to find the guys Ford used to work with as the Slimanification of menswear axed the whole generation.I agree on a lot of things you said but at the same time, this is a weird time.
Even if he started working in fashion in the 80’s, Tom Ford access to stardom started 30 years ago. We have been used to his aesthetic for 30 years and now we are witnessing a change of generation and the building of an heritage brand in front of us…
I don’t expect it to be strong right away. And I don’t necessarily expect this to speak to me in a way that Tom Ford by Tom spoke to me. I love the Gucci / YSL years. They have shaped my taste. I loved the Tom Ford by Tom Ford days…And they were highly controversial. I have at least 1 item from almost every collection, even if on paper you wouldn’t associate Tom Ford the brand with my style.
I think we would want a John Galliano at Dior kind of situation but maybe the company, in order to establish itself need a Marc Bohan. And I’m totally fine with it.
They chose Hawkings because menswear is the most established category for the brand. In an ideal world, they would have had a separate designer for the womenswear and my choice would have been Alexandre Vauthier.
But the brand needs a singular vision.
Maybe Hawkings will surprise us but I don’t expect the brand to be though provoking, pushing taste or being a leader in terms of fashion conversation.
At least, I know the integrity of the house will be preserved.
And in a way, going back to the spirit of the Gucci days will allow him to be more free with the heritage quite contrived of Tom Ford the brand.
Hawkings is definitely here to act as a Bohan, but that makes that makes it all the more important to create a strong brand identity that can evolve over time. Dior was worse off by the end of Bohan's tenure, because the 50s aesthetic aged horribly. By Arnault's acquisition, the house was surviving on parasitic licensing.
While Vauthier would be great at Tom Ford, I'd prefer him at Alaïa. Personally, I'd try to poach Vaccarello from Saint Laurent. Vaccarello claims to inspired by Ford, while Ford has expressed admiration for Vaccarello's YSL. Of course, we'd need a separate CD for menswear, which defeats the purpose of Zegna's strategy for the brand.