LadyJunon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 5,005
- Reaction score
- 11,910
Nothing leaked, he does that all the time. They even did it once on the official account.
I mean, JWA has leaked his collection 3 months before the show. So if someone do 1 look or glimpse, it’s fine at this point.
means no Rafication of Versace .....could prada not pay more dam it!!!!!So based on intel I received, they managed to keep him in in the end
. Let's see how long that lasts.(allegedly with some extra $$$) allegedly he was supposed to leave next year
For sure they send a copy for proof reading to Pieter or at least his team as is normal with interview there is no excuse its not first time that's why PVO draws a line now publicly.I guess that's our answer as to whether PVO's getting a CD job: Never.
That said, this is really irresponsible on Bazaar's part as it makes Mulier look really bad for no reason. There's already comments trashing him for "lying".
interviews with magazines you get send for proof reading you think Blazy and his team are so small and new they won't request this ??It’s his right to shout! It’s his work and he should be the one celebrated for that.
It’s not Pieter’s fault, solely lazy press that has articles written by incompetent people.
The lack of fashion history knowledge is really sad in a industry where it’s quite easy to obtain the real info through sources when you are under a name like Harper’s Bazaar.
This is the industry at the same time that falls into the traps of social media short memory.
I réitère. A fashion journalist doing an article has to do their due dilligence.interviews with magazines you get send for proof reading you think Blazy and his team are so small and new they won't request this ??
we really think his knowledge of doing press is so rookie ?
i highly doubt it its common courtesy when your doing a piece on someone because you can get sued etc .
my stomach turns to read it's not pieters fault it's solely lazy press .....we can't be this hero centric with companies or people in power positions.
repsblity lies in both sides the interview and person being interviewed
Maybe he feels like he is an imposter.^ He's liking any comments that criticize Pieter though.
I know when we had to proofread interviews it was done by multiple people from the PR director to the right hand of CD and every department that's had to check for accuracy or signoff in case something like even a book title was correct etc its a normal thing!!It's not irrelevant.I réitère. A fashion journalist doing an article has to do their due diligence.
It’s their publication, their reputation, their job to do the thing.
I don’t care for Pieter. Because this kind of fault won’t lie into him.
The fact that a magazine send an article before validation and everything is almost irrelevant to the fact.
The reader of the magazine is the one who is going to be fooled by a false information. In that case, it’s not Pieter’s fault.
It’s my POV.
If I decide to lie in a publication and that lie gets printed on, it’s not my fault if the journalist didn’t do basic fact-check. Even more in something that is so widely known.
Now I’m the one side-eyeing Bazaar because you expect a certain level of accuracy from a big prestigious magazine.