Prada to Sell Sander To London Equity Fund

PRADA sells Jil Sander AG

Private Equity Group to Buy Jil Sander Label From Prada
01



By ERIC WILSON

Published: February 24, 2006

Raf Simons showed his first women's collection for the embattled Jil Sander fashion label in Milan on Monday, eliciting the approval of fickle fashion editors and praise from store buyers for restoring virtue to the house. Three days later, a group of investors also saw value.


Change Capital Partners, a London-based private equity firm, announced yesterday that it would buy Jil Sander from the Prada Group, after years of losses for the label and management battles that led to the resignation of its namesake designer — twice.

Patrizio Bertelli, the chief executive of Prada, said after Ms. Sander's first departure in 2000 that "lots of houses do fine without a creative designer." She returned after several months and left again in the fall of 2004.

Change Capital, a three-year-old equity group, which declined to name its acquisition price, signaled that it placed a higher value on the role of designer by giving equity in the company to Mr. Simons, along with two top managers: Gian Giacomo Ferraris, the chief executive, and Armin Mueller, the chief financial officer.

"We seek to align management interests by having them as owners in the company alongside of us," said Steven Petrow, a managing director of Change Capital, which has 300 million euros under management. It also owns H2O, a wholesaler of casual sportswear in Denmark, and the retail chain Republic in Britain.

Mr. Simons, 38, has been best known for the influential skinny cut of the men's suits he designs for his signature label based in Paris. He was hired to design for Jil Sander in July.

Despite the worldwide prestige of Prada's leather goods and fashion business, Mr. Bertelli, the husband of the designer Miuccia Prada, has had many headaches with lesser labels acquired by his company since 1999, including Jil Sander, for which it paid slightly more than $100 million. Helmut Lang, whose business was also acquired that year, left his company last year, and Prada has ceased production of Helmut Lang clothing while entertaining offers for a sale.

There had been little excitement about the Jil Sander collections designed in her absence until Mr. Simons's effort this week, which drew reactions that were both effusive and unusual. Sarah Mower, writing on Style.com, said of the clothes, "Minimal, respectful and highly erotic, they were a signal, perhaps, of something unusual Simons can bring to fashion: the touch of a heterosexual man." Julie Gilhart, the fashion director of Barneys New York and a top retailer of the label, said yesterday in Milan, "There wasn't one outfit we didn't like."

"It's not really about minimalism," Ms. Gilhart said. "It's about what's necessary, with no excess."

Ms. Sander's business, which she founded in 1975 in Hamburg, became known for its stark suits and coats, clean of embellishment. After her first departure, its condition deteriorated rapidly. Losses averaged 25 million euros a year (about $30 million) on sales that the company has reported as remaining flat, around 140 million euros. A restructuring that began in 2004 led Prada to predict that the Jil Sander brand would break even this year.

"In the mid- to late 90's this brand was doing incredibly well," Mr. Petrow of Change Capital said. "They have now returned the company to break-even, which represents a fantastic base for us to go forward." He expressed little interest in discussing the possibility of an encore performance from Ms. Sander, but had only praise for Mr. Simons.

"He has come in and effected a transition from Jil Sander herself, kept what is strong about the brand and put his own twist on it without changing the brand dramatically," Mr. Petrow said. After the show, he said, "there was a great buzz in the room, especially at the end when he came out onto the runway. It gave us a sigh of relief."

courtesy of www.newyorktimes.com
 
^merged into pre-existing thread, please do a search before posting, thanks:flower:
 
maria said:
I hope Jil Sander will come back then!!!!!

I hope so too. I hope they fire Raf, so he will learn the hard way about the likes of Bertelli. This maybe the harshest thing I've ever said fashionwise, but that's what I wish. I really despise Bertelli, I hope Prada's IPO will be the biggest bomb.
 
Well, faust... From what I've read and heard, he does seem like nothing but a greedy business man while Miuccia appears to be more conservative when it comes to the company. It's her family business, and she seems reluctant to go public with it...

Like she said in an interview, it could be hard to justify the beautiful stores, or the Fondazione Prada which only costs and isn't generating any money, once they go public.

I would bet she wouldn't try to maximise profits by moving production to China...
 
tott said:
Well, faust... From what I've read and heard, he does seem like nothing but a greedy business man while Miuccia appears to be more conservative when it comes to the company. It's her family business, and she seems reluctant to go public with it...

Like she said in an interview, it could be hard to justify the beautiful stores, or the Fondazione Prada which only costs and isn't generating any money, once they go public.

I would bet she wouldn't try to maximise profits by moving production to China...

That's an interesting comment. I've read that supposedly her NYC store on Broadway will never make money. That is the case with many flagships, I think...
 
We've talked about the whole Bertelli/Prada issue before... but I stand by what I said last time:

It is easy to demonize Bertelli, but in reality I think that it is much more complicated than just to say "he's an ***." Certainly, his ideas go against what many of us here would agree with, but without his hardline stubborness, Prada would still be a small label that only fashionistas would know about (like Marni or something like that). It would be a label that would have to be a little less free with its runway collections/clothes, because it would have to worry a little more about how they sold.

As it stands, Prada's accessories and shoe business certainly dominate their profits. Because of that, Miuccia CAN be a little more reserved, a little more eccentric, a little more FREE to do what she wants in her runway collections. YES, it is true that she still has to watch what she does, but nevertheless an accessories business bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars a year gives her a little less pressure to produce a simply commercial collection.

So, what I'm saying is that perhaps the elements of Prada that we LIKE or LOVE only exist as they do because of Bertelli... who we all seem to hate. Remember, too, that Miuccia has often said in interviews that her reservations often lead her to inaction and she needs someone to be a little pushy.

John
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rach2jlc said:
We've talked about the whole Bertelli/Prada issue before... but I stand by what I said last time:

It is easy to demonize Bertelli, but in reality I think that it is much more complicated than just to say "he's an ***." Certainly, his ideas go against what many of us here would agree with, but without his hardline stubborness, Prada would still be a small label that only fashionistas would know about (like Marni or something like that). It would be a label that would have to be a little less free with its runway collections/clothes, because it would have to worry a little more about how they sold.

As it stands, Prada's accessories and shoe business certainly dominate their profits. Because of that, Miuccia CAN be a little more reserved, a little more eccentric, a little more FREE to do what she wants in her runway collections. YES, it is true that she still has to watch what she does, but nevertheless an accessories business bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars a year gives her a little less pressure to produce a simply commercial collection.

So, what I'm saying is that perhaps the elements of Prada that we LIKE or LOVE only exist as they do because of Bertelli... who we all seem to hate. Remember, too, that Miuccia has often said in interviews that her reservations often lead her to inaction and she needs someone to be a little pushy.

John

See, that doesn't work for me, because I think she is talentless to begin with - she's the master of the ripoff. But, if I were to think she's talented, I would agree with your statement :flower:
 
^^ I don't feel like I personally am demonizing Bertelli... The fact is that he (and the dynamic between them) has pushed the label forward in many ways, and he certainly deserves recognition for that. Does that mean that everything he pushes through is automatically the right thing to do?
 
Baudelaire is suprisingly prescient on the subject:

C'est le Diable (ie Patrizio Bertelli) qui tient les fils qui nous remuent!
Aux objets repugnants (ie Prada) nous trouvons des appas;
Chaque jour vers l'Enfer (ie being bought by Prada) nous descendons d'un pas
Sans horreur, a travers des tenebres qui puent

Interestingly, the Guardian tried to tell me today that Prada became famous because some bonehead stylist dressed Uma Thurman in it for 1995s Oscars.

That's why Prada Sport's stripe is that infernal red...
 
faust said:
See, that doesn't work for me, because I think she is talentless to begin with - she's the master of the ripoff. But, if I were to think she's talented, I would agree with your statement :flower:

Faust,

You have the nicest possible way of disagreeing, haha. But, I definitely see what you mean. I actually like what she does; I think that it is perhaps just a different kind of talent to be able to merge things together, even if they exist elsewhere. So, while she may not be terribly original, I still don't think she's without merit. But, I guess that has nothing to do with Jil Sander being sold, does it? Okay, okay... well, I think that Jil Sander was truly original. :P

John
 
I don't think Sander has any intention of coming back and I doubt they would let Raf go. The brand might even do better without her.
 
rach2jlc said:
Faust,

You have the nicest possible way of disagreeing, haha. But, I definitely see what you mean. I actually like what she does; I think that it is perhaps just a different kind of talent to be able to merge things together, even if they exist elsewhere. So, while she may not be terribly original, I still don't think she's without merit. But, I guess that has nothing to do with Jil Sander being sold, does it? Okay, okay... well, I think that Jil Sander was truly original. :P

John

I don't think Jil was anything special either :lol::ninja:
 
rach...don't bother...
for some people...ignorance is bliss....


and it's their loss ...
they are the ones who cannot see for their eyes have not been opened...

:angel:...
 
exactly. ignorance is bliss, especially for those who confuse ignorance with difference of opinion.
 
Ignorance is bliss when a comment is believed as the truth by others, when in all reality, it is not. An ignorant person only believes their own precieved knowledge of another's accomplishment in that field.
 
vogue.co.uk

BELGIAN designer Raf Simons, who received rave reviews for his Jil Sander collection last week, took in the Rick Owens show in Paris before racing back to Milan to meet his new backers this week. "I still haven't met [them]," he said of Change Capital Partners, who announced just days ago that they had acquired Sander from Prada. "I expected a purchase, and I'm excited. They have fantastic intentions. I'm looking forward to a new future with a new investor."


As much as I love Jil Sander, I hope Raf Simons will stay.
 
Creamy Thighs said:
I'm just wondering, Prada is frequently stated as having financial troubles - do any of the major businesses that it owns actually make money (or if not, have they ever since being taken over by Prada Group)? Specifically I'm referring to Prada, Miu Miu, Jil Sander and Helmut Lang.
Nope! LOL. They dont know how to make a plan and stick to it. I love Jil Sander and Helmut Lang. Miu Miu is hot. Prada...the pr department is whoa! All the stores and ads are almost always amazing! They all have an edge or something different about them and instead of using to rip people's hearts out they leave laying on a table unused.
 
tott said:
Well, faust... From what I've read and heard, he does seem like nothing but a greedy business man while Miuccia appears to be more conservative when it comes to the company. It's her family business, and she seems reluctant to go public with it...

Like she said in an interview, it could be hard to justify the beautiful stores, or the Fondazione Prada which only costs and isn't generating any money, once they go public.

I would bet she wouldn't try to maximise profits by moving production to China...
LOL. Yes. It's all about money money if they go public which I would assume is not going to happen til she's dead. And no. f*cking China! We dont pay to see Made in China! We pay to see Made in Italy! :rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->