S/S 2010 Ad Campaigns (please read post #1 before posting)

[MarionasMuse]

NO NO NO no Emma Watson for anything. Burberry is enough. Go back to your studying and leave modeling to the professional.

exactly!

 

[honeycombchild]

Emma's beautiful. I'd happily see her in another ad for something, however the rumours are most likely untrue because Christopher had every intention of using her again for the SS10 ads at Burberry.

 

[tarsha]

I like Emma but not for campaigns.

 

[FashionPower]

Emma Watson for Burberry would be just AWESOME!The SS10 collection was to die for,so cool,sexy,sleek and young!Emma would be just perfect since she's a stunning girl,who is also very talented and has a great style
Simon Nessman and Kate Moss for Versace is SO WRONG!!Kate is probably the worst person who would be casted for such crazy and bada$$ show,she will turn everything into something really mediocre,like always.
Will Chalker would have been perfect for the campaign,since he was an exclusive for the show(if we can talk of model's exclusives for men fashion)

 

[jacquelineo]

I would much rather see Emma in the campaigns then to see Natalia take every one.

 

[Bellaly]

Hm, not agree with Emma.
She's pretty but she's not a model for me. I also didn'l liked the Burbery F/W 09 campaign... don't know..

 

[ad041715]

Ok, why is Jamie listed as having the Lanvin campaign on the 1st page?
Weren't we just theorizing how it would look? There's no confirmation to this whatsoever!

It says the source for the Jamie for Lanvin and Marc Jacobs campaigns was Mad0789.
This was her quote:

I heard Jamie Bochert is doing Marc Jacobs and Lanvin... Not sure if it's really true though.

Ok, this is just a comment/rumor. You can't post that Jamie got MJ and Lanvin on the first page when the source is based on her quote. That's ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

Just saying.

 

[user.n.]

Emma Watson for Burberry would be just AWESOME!The SS10 collection was to die for,so cool,sexy,sleek and young!Emma would be just perfect since she's a stunning girl,who is also very talented and has a great style
Simon Nessman and Kate Moss for Versace is SO WRONG!!Kate is probably the worst person who would be casted for such crazy and bada$$ show,she will turn everything into something really mediocre,like always.
Will Chalker would have been perfect for the campaign,since he was an exclusive for the show(if we can talk of model's exclusives for men fashion)

Good you mentioned it. I really wanted Will and Noah for the campaign...

Emma will be good i think, too. I used to dislike her but i realized she is the perfect Burberry girl. There's no problem with Emma.

 

[Forrest]

Ok, why is Jamie listed as having the Lanvin campaign on the 1st page?
Weren't we just theorizing how it would look? There's no confirmation to this whatsoever!

It says the source for the Jamie for Lanvin and Marc Jacobs campaigns was Mad0789.
This was her quote:


Ok, this is just a comment/rumor. You can't post that Jamie got MJ and Lanvin on the first page when the source is based on her quote. That's ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

Just saying.

Agree with you

 

[lanvinray]

Armani Exchange - M: Bruna Boechat; Info: fordmodelsmg.com.br [lanvinray]

Bruna Boechat para Armani Exchange

A vida da top Bruna Boechat anda a mil! A modelo esteve presente no seleto casting do desfile da Armani Exchange em Nova York. O time de modelos era tão restrito que Bruna foi a única brasileira da turma. Bruna também foi vista pelos quatro cantos do planeta na seletiva do Supermodel em NY por ser uma das tops convidadas pela Ford americana a estar presente no dia. Vale lembrar que a linda foi descoberta pelo mesmo concurso em 2005 e hoje ocupa espaço entre as principais tops do planeta.

fordmodelsmg.com.br

 

[FRANCY ITALY]

^ the article is saying she's doing the runway show, not the campaign, no?

 

[tocceve]

Ok, this is just a comment/rumor. You can't post that Jamie got MJ and Lanvin on the first page when the source is based on her quote. That's ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

Since the moderators have been very very careful with updating the list in the past and don't put many rumours from here on the first page (which were later proven as wrong) this is actually more of a hint that Jamie is actually doing those campaigns.

 

[haksare]

Ooh I just researched Bruna B and she's a beautiful girl! She's possibly going to be posing alongside a possibly half naked Marlon Teixeira though and for that I am envious!

 

[FRANCY ITALY]

limy the article is not saying anything on a possible campaign

 

[haksare]

^ oh, nevermind then. I just embarassed myself

 

[lanvinray]

I got some good news for y'all...3 girls on Marc by Marc One is a huge favorite, the other is a latina catwalker and last is a cute newbie I''ll drop the bomb later, I need to eat lunch

 

[Faith Akiyama]

Ok, why is Jamie listed as having the Lanvin campaign on the 1st page?
Weren't we just theorizing how it would look? There's no confirmation to this whatsoever!

It says the source for the Jamie for Lanvin and Marc Jacobs campaigns was Mad0789.
This was her quote:


Ok, this is just a comment/rumor. You can't post that Jamie got MJ and Lanvin on the first page when the source is based on her quote. That's ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

Just saying.

We don't add anything to the first page unless there is already reliable third party confirmation (Either public or private) on any rumor, which in this case there was in addition to that post. Do you see anything about Emma Watson on the first page simply based on the Fashionista article?

Please don't assume that we moderate with such carelessness and call it out as being "ridiculous." Even if you suspected that something was amiss, a more amicable word choice as to the possible error would've been appreciated. This thread (Not to mention many of its contributing members) has become a decent resource/reference in itself, and none of the moderators here want to jeopardize that by fueling unsubstantiated rumors. The immediate removal of Kasia for Balenciaga near the beginning of the thread as soon as it was proven false is just another example.

I'm honestly stunned that this kind of harsh accusation was actually thrown out here when the thread, not to mention its predecessors, exists merely as something helpful and has been very dependable already. Hopefully this will at least remind everyone reading exactly how things work here and that the first few posts can be trusted 99% of the time.

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

i really dont want to see Jamie for Lanvin
but oh well i guess ill live lol

 

[xerq]

wtf is it really official that Jamie is doing Lanvin?

 

[Lackuiew]

Exactly....that shemale face ruinning such a perfect collection could be the last thing i'd like to see..shame on Marc Jacobs as well