Lola701
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Messages
- 11,454
- Reaction score
- 24,523
KERING has exactly the same expectations for McQueen that Arnault had for Dior in the 90’s. The only difference was maybe that Arnault was a bit more « naive » and the structure of Dior as a corporate entity wasn’t as strong as it is today…Dior was a small company.i can’t see mcqueen being anywhere near as demanding as dior was.
But with the top brands of the group and literally the majority of the group in a uncertainty in terms of growth, the goal for KERING is to now have a bunch of super brands (which means + 1 billion each except for Brioni) that will grow and create some sort of stability for the shareholders.
It may be interesting for a creative point of view (for me it’s not…Galliano has more to offer ) but believe me that Alexander McQueen in 2023 is more demanding than Dior in 2000/2010.
The name Galliano will create a buzz and attention. This is the brand that is dressing Kate Middleton after all. The status of McQueen has changed…Which is why, slow sales now mean a change of CD.
I think Sarah Burton may have lacked in passion and Drama but her interpretation of McQueen was focused and modern. It somehow allowed the house to become a brand.
I love John but I’m not nostalgic at all of the madhouse days. It was good back then but trying to recreate the spirit of the past is not my thing. The world is less sympathetic to creativity than it was before. I like the idea of him taking ownership of his own brand though and maybe operating on a more confidential scale.