The Polo Shirt

kit

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
3
Style


Pukka chukka


[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Charlie Porter charts the rise of the polo shirt, a modern menswear classic[/font]

[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]Friday April 8, 2005
The Guardian

[/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]I can chart their rise in my own wardrobe. Two years ago, I only owned one polo, a vivid pink thing from Lacoste bought as much for the colour as the style. Back then, the polo itself wasn't important to me. In 2004, I accumulated seven, four from Gap and three Fred Perrys. I assumed, then, that we had reached breaking point. Not so - spring 2005 has yet to take a proper hold, and I've already bought four. There are many more to come.[/font]

In the GQ office, we have often talked about how the polo has replaced the T-shirt, and about the slow burn of influences that have led to this mass adoption. There are obvious visual references, like the initial buzz around Seth from The OC. There have been industry nudges, too, most powerfully from the recent collaboration between Comme des Garçons and Fred Perry, which has put designer polo shirts on the high fashion floors of department stores.


But while we fashion people would love to take credit for the style, in fact, we are lagging behind. A whole swathe of non-fashion men - think Prince Harry, Jeremy Paxman - have been wearing polos as their wardrobe staple summer in, summer out. One was on Blair's back when he visited Berlusconi last year, a Burberry check trim under his buttons. The polo is also a key part of Mike Skinner's look. The polo transcends both fashion and class.

A potted history: the game of polo comes from seventh-century Persia, and came to this country via the Raj. The shirt design has a crisp, colonial gentleman's air: the particular weave of a polo, that mesh which makes the cotton sit away from the body, is known as pique, from the French "piquer", to pierce. The weave began to be used for other sports, and in 1926 French tennis champion René Lacoste first wore a certain style of short-sleeved polo. Lacoste's nickname was "le Crocodile", hence the logo. From this comes the real reason why the polo works. For men who have sport as their primary interest, the polo is an obvious crossover from activity to lifestyle. It's why the polo is a consistently popular line for labels like Hackett. To these consumers, the polo is not a fashion garment, it's what they wear to relax, and signify that they are off duty.

But the brands that cater for these men aren't stupid. In the coming summer of colour, Hackett has some of the brightest shades available in its polos, more daring than those from many more fashion-forward labels. Another stalwart, Polo Ralph Lauren, has pushed its failsafe shirts to the subversive limit, with jarring pink stripes on a green background, or vivid orange with black and white on another. (Polo fact: it was in 1972, five years after Ralph Lauren founded his company, that he introduced what he called "the mesh shirt". He took the name Polo in 1967 for what was then a tie company because he liked what the word evoked.)

A sense of subversion is often present in polo styling. This is particularly true of the west coast look, which takes its lead from reborn golf brands like Penguin. But in Britain, it is as if fashion consumers are choosing the style precisely because it's not subversive. For many young men, adopting the polo is a rest from trying to be different. This echoes what has been happening in womenswear: florals and wrap-dresses, clothing that exists simply to make people look cute.

This summer there are three types of polo. The cheapest are Topman's range of muted colour stripes made from normal T-shirt cotton. They are clearly not durable - already the collar of mine is drooping flat on to the shoulders rather than sitting stiff around the neck. But this is not a problem, so long as you are aware of their disposability.

The second category consists of updates on the traditional polo, including the aforementioned examples by Hackett and Ralph Lauren, as well as those from more directional houses like Miu Miu. (Miuccia Prada's younger brand has a hit polo in warm stripes and the Miu Miu logo on the chest.) Meanwhile, Fred Perry is milking the trend while it can. As well as the Comme collaboration, there is now a bespoke service at the label's Covent Garden store. With it come your own initials on the shirt, and a choice of colour for both the material and the trims. You can even have a different colour cuff on your left and right arms. This is the age of consumer choice, after all.

But the biggest fashion story this summer is the knit polo, which comes from Prada and Missoni. Both collections have a feel of oddball upper-class travel about them, but with mixed-up colours to ensure the Riviera flavour does not become too literal. No longer practical for sport, such pieces are more for dressing up rather than everyday wear. And so, the polo covers all bases this season.

Early adopters will soon face a problem. As much as looking nice in a polo is pleasing, it soon gets boring. And because there are already so many polos around, soon too many men will look the same. When that happens, fashion moves on. At the moment, designers are sending out researchers to find fresh vintage pieces to plunder for the spring/summer '06 collections. Some designers might even get round to doing some original work. And on their way to the thrift stores, the researchers will pass a legion of potential consumers already wearing polos. Since you've got to offer the customer something they don't have, the researchers will have to scour for something different.

We'll see the results at the shows in a couple of months' time. As with all fading trends, you can ditch them early or enjoy them while they last. I'll be doing the latter. · Charlie Porter is associate editor of GQ.
 
Charlie's got a bit of a thing about polo shirts and preppy things generally.

I've always quite liked them, and got a couple of the comme fred perry ones last year, but they are soooooo common now that I think it's time to stick them in the back of the wardrobe for a couple of years. Chav-tastic. Especially in pink. I saw some 13 year old lads walking in front of me the other day - ALL of them were wearing pink polos with shirt collars turned up. Aaaaaaarrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh. I wanted to hit them all. Idiots.
 
I knew this thread would have something to do with Charlie Porter. I haven't yet read the article but I'm also guessing that Fred Perry by Comme Des Garcons will be mentioned. The man is a walking prep-mobile.

I don't really see how polo shirts would fit in my wardrobe. It's like the freak lovechild of a proper shirt and a t-shirt.
 
PrinceOfCats said:
I knew this thread would have something to do with Charlie Porter. I haven't yet read the article but I'm also guessing that Fred Perry by Comme Des Garcons will be mentioned. The man is a walking prep-mobile.

I don't really see how polo shirts would fit in my wardrobe. It's like the freak lovechild of a proper shirt and a t-shirt.

You are of course right about the FP/comme thing. Polos are simple classic itmes though Prince, it's just their hi-jacking by the chavsters that casues the problem.
 
at times I'm actually thankful for living in a trend-******** city like Stockholm. I do wear polos when I need to casualise abit and they are very very comfy.
 
Wait, I thought Swedes were at the epitomy of trendiness? When I went, they all were extremely trendy and compared to Americans, American's looked even worst.

I feel like smacking those tweens with their upturned collars. Especially those in pink Burberry nova-check polos. Urgh!
 
I love polos (and would never turn the collar up unless my neck was getting grilled and I'd forgotten my sunblocker) - but lately I haven't been able to figure out how to wear them. It just seems wrong and chavy. What to do?
 
Johnny said:
Charlie's got a bit of a thing about polo shirts and preppy things generally.

I've always quite liked them, and got a couple of the comme fred perry ones last year, but they are soooooo common now that I think it's time to stick them in the back of the wardrobe for a couple of years. Chav-tastic. Especially in pink. I saw some 13 year old lads walking in front of me the other day - ALL of them were wearing pink polos with shirt collars turned up. Aaaaaaarrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh. I wanted to hit them all. Idiots.


is that POSSIBLE? wow, they didn't see how stupid they looked? argh
 
I don't mind people turning the collar up in general. personally i think it looks great on girls to turn the collar up, just the structure of the shirt that is created. what annoys you guys about it?
 
^The fact that everyone does it and thinks it immediately makes them stylish.
 
i luv polo on guys...make them look casual but HOT ..especially those colorful ones
 
Lately I've been so anal about not having my collars up, I mean hello, 80's much?
 
I hate polo shirts, last spring I was going nuts for them but this spring I can't stand to look at them. They do flatter my chest but that's about it, and since everyone and their mother is wearing them in teal (the color I have) I dont want to wear it. Not much of a loss, I got it on Ebay, $20 for a Lacoste polo.

I did turn the collars up last year, it frames my face and gives me that seductive modely vibe. I just hate polos and turning the collar up, atrocious taste.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arturo21 said:
Wait, I thought Swedes were at the epitomy of trendiness? When I went, they all were extremely trendy and compared to Americans, American's looked even worst.

I feel like smacking those tweens with their upturned collars. Especially those in pink Burberry nova-check polos. Urgh!

When I went to American I closed my eyes and frowned on the inside alot so perhaps your rights. It's just that alot of the trends that pop up in America and Britain do seem to linger around abit until they cross the pond and attack us. The trends here are ehm white lacoste shoes and obnixous teen-hats?
 
Diorling said:
I did turn the collars up last year, it frames my face and gives me that seductive modely vibe. I just hate polos and turning the collar up, atrocious taste.

I live in the south, and trends seem to either come slower/develop slower AND leave slower (oh god, the PAIN I suffer, haha) but not many people wear polo shirts, let alone with the collar up.
With that said, it very much flatters my face also, and the one good outcome of slower trends down here is that I know what's going on and can wear everything before everyone else, look REALLY instyle, and be "over" trends before anyone else. or just pass on trends alltogether. I love it.

*edit* Wow. Run on sentence. There was a point there- I can still wear my polo collars up because only 2 or 3 people in my whole school are doing that also. It's not a huge mass-exposure trend thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yeah i have loads of ralph lauren polos, i wouldnt class them as a trend though just part of everyday basic walldrobe
 
Johnny said:
You are of course right about the FP/comme thing. Polos are simple classic itmes though Prince, it's just their hi-jacking by the chavsters that casues the problem.

. On the one hand you don't want to look like a charva, on the other you don't want to look like Charlie 'Topshop' Porter.
 
I've got two polos, one navy with pink stripes and one green and white one. I like them, and they're flattering, but I don't see why everyone wears them like every day with the collars turned up. Especially the Highschool kids wearing $80 pink Lacoste shirts. It looks silly.
 
I do like this Carol Christian Poell polo that Raijin posted yesterday in "Yay or Nay?". I love the overlock stitching.

155034.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,525
Messages
15,187,966
Members
86,410
Latest member
evcnle
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->