Trompe l'oeil...

Not clothing, but a nice example of trompe l'oeil: bedsheets by Bless, with a sleeping couple printed on them. Sorry if you can't see much from the pic, this was the only one I could find (from www.bless-service.de).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does these qualify? Jean-Paul Gaultier.

http://www.***************/image/0606200311090126.jpghttp://www.***************/image/0606200311090120.jpg

http://www.***************/image/0606200311090321.jpg
 
I'm going to restart this thread..I hope you'll help me, I love those things!
 
Last ones..
I dont know who did thoose, they come from a recent jap mag..
 
emi . . . who does that coat? I've been in love with it forever.
 
I have no idea cos the article is written in japanese.. but maybe some of our japanese friens can help us?;)
 
i have wondered for a while now what this is......have seen you all bring it up in discussions in designers & collections and not wanted to step out and ask....:ninja:....

so i looked it up....and got a lot along the lines of....:
(French) trick of the eye, used especially in regard to graphic finishes which give the illusion of depth (ie the realistic painting of doors and architectural fixtures on a flat surface).

what exactly qualifies as trompe l'oeil in fashion....??....
the examples here help....though i'm still a little confused...
is it that almost cartoonish 'drawing' effect....?

i dont see it in the jpg pics....:huh:....
 
it is usually used to describe something that gives you the illusion (tricks you) of having a bow on it for example, as with this elsa schiaparelli piece:
Schiaparelli-image-2.jpg

from www.philly1.com
 
okay.....
thx anna...:flower:...

so do the gaultier pics qualify as trompe l'oeil...?
does the 'illusion' have to be through a specific method....or of a specific thing...ei. a bow, belt, etc..?
 
i don't think it has to be a specific method or a specific thing.
but to me the gaultier pieces do not really qualify.
i'll leave the field to the more elaborate now:flower:
 
its so totally HUGE for ss06, thanks for bumping this thread adore faith :heart:

some visuals frm ss06 photos style.com

Moschino
00060m.jpg


00090m.jpg


00190m.jpg



00230m.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The JPG are kind of a trompe l'oeil, but I think it's much more common in regards to a print or something, like those sneakers. It's like, something that looks like it's there, but it's not really there.

Moschino s/s 06
00440m.jpg
00460m.jpg


Marc Jacobs f/w 01
00014.L.JPG
00022.L.JPG

00029.L.JPG
00052.L.JPG


Lanvin s/s 03
00137.L.JPG
00012.L.JPG


all photos: Style.com and Firstview.com
 
thanks very much spike....
very helpful....:flower:

what about the lanvin pics though...?
are they not jeweled...:huh:
 
yeah, the Lanvin aren't a traditional trompe l'oeil, but I though since it suggests a necklace that isn't actually there it kind of fit.

Almost forgot YSL s/s 03, which played heavily with trompe l'oeil effects
00084.L.JPG
00164.L.JPG

00203.L.JPG
00027.L.JPG

00143.L.JPG
00178.L.JPG


firstview.com
 
thx for the pics lena....:heart:

how do they do this...?...is it labor intensive....or time consuming...?
so many questions....i know....:lol:

*edit...
alright i'm a little bit confused....:ninja:
these most recent pics....the detailing on the back.....why is this trompe l'oeil....what is it 'suggesting'....?.....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,717
Messages
15,234,810
Members
87,589
Latest member
shady
Back
Top