Twilight

Has Cam been confirmed? I don't know how I feel about this! He is gorg, this is true, but I can't imagine him as James. Ho hum, we shall see!
 
I hope he hasn't been confirmed. I really don't see him as James either...
 
Me either. :doh:

I feel like James needs to look more ... manlier and less boy, if that makes any sense. High cheekbones, dark hair, muscular body. That sounds like Edward's description but whatever, I can't explain it. James always striked me as older and well, MANLY. Cam looks like a typical pretty boy and I just don't see James as someone who is ordinary.

Vampires are known to be fantastically gorgeous, dark, and evi. Whoever plays James should fit that appearance description. Cam, fantastically gorgeous? Pass. In fact, I had the same problem when it came to casting Edward. I was terrified they would cast a fugly bum. However, they proved me wrong cos Robert is an excellent choice. :flower: So yeah. Overall, I really, really hope Cam is not confirmed for Twilight!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Twilight Lexicon just posted this article:
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4464/0211twivg2.jpg

Michael Welch has been cast as Mike Newton!
mw1.jpg

9_large.jpg

http://www.michaelwelchonline.com
 
^ That's pretty much a spot on cast. He really looks almost exactly like I pictured Mike.
 
Very good Mike :)

But yeah, I disagree with Cam as well. I thought James was paler, with black hair, the more defined cheekbones, and a permanent snarl. He could still pull it off though, I suppose..
 
Mike Newton is the first casting choice I have zero problems with. He looks like that average looking guy I envisioned. Spot on!
 
That is definately Mike :) as for someone playing James. Stephenie Meyer had pick someone like John Stamos and Cam is nothing like that.

IDK i'm starting to have more and more faith in this movie. Movie Blogs are talking about how huge this franchise could be and are comparing it to Harry Potter and LOTR in terms of future ticket sales. They would need to add more to the plot in order to make a better movie. i'm glad it seems they are focusing just on Twilight and not making a weird mix of twilight and new moon as previously rumored.
 
^Oh dear no. As much as I like Twilight, I will have to smack anyone who dares to compare it to Harry Potter.
 
Elizabeth Reaser as Esme
1.png


Rachel Lefevre as Victoria
00000.png


Peter Facinelli as Carlisle
000000000000.png


Nikki Reed as Rosalie
000000000000000000.png


Ashley Greene as Alice
000000000000000.png


from ontd
 
Nikki Reed and Elizabeth Reaser are the worst casting decisions EVER. WTF. Bella is more attractive than the Cullens.
 
I'm officially renting this movie, hell if I'm paying to see Nikki Reed as Rosalie. The Cullen's were supposed to be incredibly beautiful but so far no one in the cast stands out even in the least bit. I'm wondering if the people who did the casting even read the book because it sure doesn't seem that way.
 
^ The only reason Nikki Reed got the part is because her dad is dating the director (Catherine Hardwicke).
 
^Oh dear no. As much as I like Twilight, I will have to smack anyone who dares to compare it to Harry Potter.

:blink: obviously you didnt finish reading. compares it to harry potter IN TERMS OF FUTURE TICKET SALES. If twilight can do just as well we can expect to see a movie for each of the books stephenie writes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,245
Messages
15,215,320
Members
87,202
Latest member
brattyfox
Back
Top