VogueGirl8910
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 48,029
- Reaction score
- 8,772
I don't like this cover 

Hil did an editorial feature in Vogue as a Senator, I don't know about a cover...
"This thoroughly re-establishes her credibility as a sex symbol"
Oh,good looking out MMA...I will be buying those thanI don't think so. It is much too early for such a cover. After Michelle settles into her role as first lady she'll get her Vogue cover. Actually WWD is reporting that both Ebony & Essence are vying for the Obama's for a January cover.
^ oh. my. god.
your avatar!!!!!
AWESOMENESS!!!![]()
![]()
Agreed on the top partI don't like this cover. Jen's covers are always boring. The inside pictures are much better.
Moving on? Well, tell that to Angelina Jolie who keeps telling people in every interview how she fell in love and bringing the spotlight to her relatiionship. If she didn't open that can of worms...
Back to the topic,why does she get the covers...she's not even really working
Besides the fact that this is so celebrity and fame obsessed, its BORING.
I find absolutely nothing interesting in Jennifer Aniston - she neither has a unique look or a unique career.
What is the point of using her? I don't understand these cover choices. If you're not going to use a model, then you best have some good reasoned explanation for putting the likes of Jennifer Aniston on the cover of a fashion magazine that claims to be 'more than a fashion magazine'.
Angie only recently let out about when it happened. Besides Brad is Angie's present and future(for now)...so if she talks about it so be it,jokes. Yet Jen is living in the past....like its over,the man's got a big family now.