US Vogue December 2010 : Angelina Jolie by Mario Testino

[Jacque Marcel]

Something looks off. Is she wearing Tom Ford?

 

[jal718]

Well, at least you can guarantee, US Vogue will ALWAYS put a bad pic of an actress on the cover every month. You have to admire such moronic consistency.

 

[judelove]

i like this. even though it's an actress as usual it's at least not the same boring a** concept. plus, bonus, it's angelina.

 

[Wolkfolk]

The intention was good, I really like the vintage feeling. But the colors are just wrong and they don't feel like December at all. I'm not overwhelmed by the cover shot, its way too bland for Angelina IMO. But her editorial is far more convincing.

 

[IAmLordZen]

US Vogue December 2010
Angelina Jolie by Mario Testino

COVER



EDITORIAL


source | justjared

 

[duynk88]

They should've switched November and December. Anne's cover was far more suited for the holiday's than this one.

right!

 

[tanii94]

The only thing I hate about this is the Spider-Man banner in the corner. The rest is lovely. Angelina takes beautiful pictures.

 

[testinofan]

ILovee the cover no much the editorial only the photo of the pink dress but i love the egemony of Testino this year great cover great eds

 

[jun3machina]

wow, this is really bland, boring and feels very wrong for the season. where's the theme in that set of pictures??? this is why i stopped buying vogue...

 

[dior_couture1245]

Ummm....that picture from the editorial where Jolie is wearing the pink gown...she is literally photoshopped into that background...and not well, I might add!

I'm sorry, but that is really low...even for Vogue US standards.

 

[clo]

Good Lord, the editorial isn't much better than the cover. I know December issues are usually about resort collections but I still feel December is Christmas and there's nothing Christmasy here. I miss that!

 

[FashinKid90]

um I like the photo in color..and the cover is pretty..but everything is so blah and predictable

 

[fantastical]

Ummm....that picture from the editorial where Jolie is wearing the pink gown...she is literally photoshopped into that background...and not well, I might add!

I'm sorry, but that is really low...even for Vogue US standards.

yes! I thought something looked off about that picture. she doesn't even have a shadow lmao who is to blame for this

meh the cover is hard to follow Anne's from last month. especially with the awful blue background

 

[IAmLordZen]

Here's another editorial shot from dlisted.

 

[clo]

This shot is nice. Thanks for posting, IAmLordZen.

 

[Bertrando3]

is this a joke? It looks so fake/photoshop gone wrong/90's bad take/UK Vogue-Natalia Vodianova-cover-look a like-bad take lol I mean it's really not good and if the editorials aren't great either, I don't think it will sell BUT as always people in love with her no matter what will buy this issue because Angelina sells everything and anything.

 

[mikel]

It's so un-US Vogue, that I still find it hard to believe that this cover is for real.

 

[Miss Dalloway]

Woah, even the edit is horrible! I suppose they thought; "Hey we got Jolie, lets just not bother, and whip something up fast, it will sell anyhow." And while we all know she will sell (as always), this is ridiculous, this is not even something Harpers Bazaar would do, the styling is awful, but even more strange is that all the images give me major " only outtakes worthy" vibe, particularly the cover shot! They could, and have done so much better with her.

 

[hysteria]

kinda weird choice of cover, but I like it. it's something different at least.

 

[Pedro]

Mario's disaster!