US Vogue February 2011 : Kristen Stewart by Mario Testino | Page 8 | the Fashion Spot

US Vogue February 2011 : Kristen Stewart by Mario Testino

You know, I personally never complained about celebrities being in covers as long as they have some sort of relevance in the fashion industry (for example; Nicole Kidman and Cate Blanchett being in the cover since they're "fashion icons" and have worked with numerous designers). Aside from Kristen occasionally wearing the latest dress from Marchesa, I really see no importance of her in the fashion industry.

Yes, we can argue that it's just another celebrity so we should be used to it. But really, it's a fashion magazine. Kristen Stewart is far from being someone you can remotely call someone who is relevant in the circles of Vogue. I wouldn't mind if she was in every other cover of Teen Vogue or Seventeen, but Vogue?

Unless you're telling me she's becoming the next muse for the great fashion houses of the world, then maybe yes she should be in the cover. I'd rather have Beyonce in the cover, at the very least she has her own label and designers love to dress her.

As for the cover itself, at the very least she looks pretty. But that's where the cover begins, and that's where the cover ends. Pretty.
 
I'm pretty sure thats just a HQ pic of the cover. Not a scan.

:lol: Regardless, they got it pretty quickly.

And the shot of Arizona Muse with her kid is just darling. :blush:
 
well, well, well yet another dissapointing cover :yuk:

it's just another american vogue standard

ha! and people expect something good for the march issue!

it'll be another :sick:
 
Gorgeous shot of Arizona, I so can't wait to see the rest!
 
Wait-is that DK feature in fact shot by Testino? I totally refuse that he could have shot something half as arresting as that. lol It definitely looks like Meisel's work-compositionally, how it's lit, the girls' dispositions..everything about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I actually like this. Her acting apart from Twilight is quite good (see Adventureland, I loved her in that) I like her personality, and it shows here, the kind of nervous, fashion conscious yet not pretentious vibe. And she's not smiling, for the second cover in a row! US Vogue is honestly off to a much better start this year. It's not a stellar cover but it's better than last year's.
 
couldn't care less for this girl, but she looks a bit better than usual. probably because of the light colours and the blondish hair... i guess they "lightened up" her always-bored face.
i can't say anything about her acting skills though. never seen her movies. not that talent matters at all to get a US Vogue cover...
i'm very curious to see arizona muse. her works have been so good.
 
Not crazy about the cover but its certainly not the worse Vogue cover I've ever seen. Kristen Stewart bores me, but I don't doubt that she will sell covers. I'm curious to see what Mario has to say about William and Kate. In a way I'm rather surprised that Vogue would publish something like this it seems so gossipy.
 
I think it's nice to see Vogue US are making more original choices with their cover stars lately. I'm personally not a massive Kristen fan and I'd rather see Sienna or Gwyneth, but that is my personal opinion. In general, I think it's great that to give some 'newer' girls a cover.
While she seems to look a bit scared, the cover is definitely a lot better than I was expecting. Love the Proenza as well.
 
I really don't think that Anna means pretty here but versatile. Arizona is an extremely versatile model, who can do any kind of look and that is something that both Natalia and Linda possess.

Tbh I find Linda and Natalia not that stunning... I find Arizona prettier :p
 
errr kirsten stewart, Anna.W must be twilight big fans lots! :lol:

i'm not a big fans of kristen but i guess the shot it's just ok, nothing special, a bit shy and awkward as always..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,248
Messages
15,292,892
Members
89,172
Latest member
theguyfrom1995
Back
Top