People want to argue about the technicalities but the truth is this is the first time someone who looks like her is on the cover solo in 130 years and I’m here for that kind of representation.
People want to argue about the technicalities but the truth is this is the first time someone who looks like her is on the cover solo in 130 years and I’m here for that kind of representation.
Depends how much applause you want to give a company who, after 130 years, has suddenly decided there's a strong business case to put 'someone who looks like her' on the cover. Because if there was a true belief in the importance of diversity at US Vogue, the person who's been in charge for decades would have sought to produce a cover like this... sometime during the past few decades, when it really would have made a difference, leading the way, setting an example, rather than lagging behind, and then being applauded for their magnificent decision in the 2020s to realise Asian people exist.
"Better late than never". Yes, be happy with the industry's scraps, and to be represented only when we've reached the dying days of fashion magazines. Be happy you're only being included because the company now has no other choice, because they'll lose money and face if they don't - not because they actually care about the principle of representation. This is a business making a business decision, and expecting their audience to assign emotional values to it. Which we will do.
Depends how much applause you want to give a company who, after 130 years, has suddenly decided there's a strong business case to put 'someone who looks like her' on the cover. Because if there was a true belief in the importance of diversity at US Vogue, the person who's been in charge for decades would have sought to produce a cover like this... sometime during the past few decades, when it really would have made a difference, leading the way, setting an example, rather than lagging behind, and then being applauded for their magnificent decision in the 2020s to realise Asian people exist.
"Better late than never". Yes, be happy with the industry's scraps, and to be represented only when we've reached the dying days of fashion magazines. Be happy you're only being included because the company now has no other choice, because they'll lose money and face if they don't - not because they actually care about the principle of representation. This is a business making a business decision, and expecting their audience to assign emotional values to it. Which we will do.
Franca Sozzani was so ahead of her time. Her Fei Fei cover came in a very unexpected moment in culture as she did with the Black Issue and Curvy Issue. She was the real visionary here. Everything Anna didn't make, Franca did it first because she was open minded and she wanted a change in society. The more I see this moves from Anna, more I love Miss Sozzani.
She recently got a Chanel beauty campaign and has been modeling for a few Korean brands, so I think so.Is she still a fashion model? I hope she is like Milla and Amber.
Franca and Edward should be applauded for putting out collectable issues ie Vogue Italy's black and curvy issues and the September 2019's "forces of change" cover.e.
Interesting perspective.
Franca is a titan of uncompromising creative vision and the Vogue she built and standardized will never be matched in our lifetime. Edward has shown to be a shrewd and strategic opportunist.
One is a true powerhouse force of change— and the other is a marketeer who rides the tide of popular opinion. Although they both exist on the same fashion spectrum— they are at either opposite, but not necessarily opposing ends. My preference and allegiance is undoubtedly clear. However, Edward is someone who plays the game very well and there’s no doubt he is the successor to Anna.
Unfortunately.
^^^ Absolutely. They are the products of their times. More than ever, creatives in this industry have to play the game to succeed: And playing the game these days, means following and catering to popular opinion as Edward has, rather than leading with unrivalled creative risks, as Franca had done.
The further implications that the playing field weren’t even, and is now evening out is a fair one. And if this fashion era— the worst in terms of creative vision of any era, is the result that the playing field is levelling, then it’s a rather huge and damning indictment of that result of levelling the playing field. Unfortunately.