The cover was obviously photoshopped. How did this get past Anna Wintour? Saw The September Issue and her meticulousness doesn't show in this cover. Poor Nicole, she looks way better than this.
What an ugly editorial. Gardening at night in those green outfits? The concept is stupid and the photos are quite ugly. I would never guess that was a VOGUE editorial.
I really dislike Karlie's ed and that reminds of why I don't like her: she is very plain, there's no beauty in her. So, there's no way she can be the new Caroline Trentini, who, at least, is strikingly beautiful.
That hair styling in Karlie is so wrong for her. The whole edit looks pretty nice, but she looks like an average girl to me there, nothing of special attracts me on her there. I feel no emotion from the editorial, despite the fact she's smiling in some shots.
Thanks, Luxx for this new ed. Here I can actually bare Karlie's presence and I must say she looks rather nice but still there's no hint of "It" girl in her.
I don't want to be, but US Vogue is turning me into a Karlie fan, seriously. There's just something about her..
I like the Demarchelier editorial, both Lily and Karlie look terrific.
Top Ten Ph. Norman Jean Roy Models: Chanel Iman, Angela Lindvall, Lily Donaldson, Elettra Rossellini, Sasha Pivovarova, Karlie Kloss Sittings Editor: Tabitha Simmons Hair: Tommy Duffy Makeup: Mark Carrasquillo
In my eyes, the shots where the two girls are standing close together don't work in Karlie's favour, because I find the close comparison of faces makes Karlie look humdrum in comparison to the finer features of Lily.
But I like the idea of them together, striding about with those long legs, so the longer I look at the those shots, maybe the face won't matter so much.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.