tigerrouge
don't look down
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 18,012
- Reaction score
- 7,533
But you already know this issue will be a bestsellingrecordbreakingtrailblazing etc success... by metrics of their choosing.
According to Vogue Mexico's IG the September Issue will be a global edition. Looks like the editorial will be printed in every sister publication of Vogue.
I'm not sure covers. Vogue Japan and China didn't reprint the covers. But the article and the portfolio will be shared. It's the first time they do it with a main story from US/UK. Wish they shared Margot Robbie photos at the time.More cover’s . I love it
It’s 370 pages, just flip no time to explore.View attachment 1234542View attachment 1234542
Remember when September US Vogue used to be nearly 900 pages? ::sigh::It’s 370 pages, just flip no time to explore.View attachment 1234542View attachment 1234542
Surprised nobody is clamouring for Kate, lol. So the cover is surprisingly well received in general, and getting a lot of buzz.
I think it might be a best-seller for Vogue. They've had at least, what 11 model covers since 2020 (most of them OG!) which is an incredible feat considering their history. There's definitely a renewed interest in models right now, the ones with a large profile and following of course. Hope more model covers are coming.
Still can't believe Cindy's last US Vogue cover was in 1994, and Linda's in 2006. Correct me if I'm wrong!
So Linda still with the record of most September covers? Now with 4.
Find timeIt’s 370 pages, just flip no time to explore.View attachment 1234542View attachment 1234542
You’re correctI think she has five; 1991, 1993, 1997, 2001, 2023.
I'm not sure if any of the models in the 60s equaled that number.
I purposefully avoided the editorial images in this thread because I wanted to see them in print. Picked up my copy at the newsstand yesterday. I can't believe we got these 4 together and the budget is almost non-existent. The same, blue background for every image? Unbelievable. A complete waste.
I purposefully avoided the editorial images in this thread because I wanted to see them in print. Picked up my copy at the newsstand yesterday. I can't believe we got these 4 together and the budget is almost non-existent. The same, blue background for every image? Unbelievable. A complete waste.
why shoot it on different colours and change them all to that awful blue?I purposefully avoided the editorial images in this thread because I wanted to see them in print. Picked up my copy at the newsstand yesterday. I can't believe we got these 4 together and the budget is almost non-existent. The same, blue background for every image? Unbelievable. A complete waste.