Benn98
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 42,530
- Reaction score
- 20,573
I know attractiveness is subjective, but I don't think he's any worse looking than Chelsea Clinton or Gabourey Sidibe. Heck, why not throw SJP and Michelle Obama in there as well. I like or love all of those women and would gladly read a feature on each of them. I admire that they've accomplished things in a culture where physical beauty in a woman in ascribed inordinate value. Each of them have been featured on major magazine covers (some of them time and time again) discussed in these forums. I don't think such a majority of posters were ever so quick to cut them down for their looks as has happened in this case. Maybe they did, and I just didn't notice.
While I agree with most of your posts, the highlighted bit stuck out in this one. Yes, these women have been featured on magazine covers, but only after they've been styled, moulded and photoshopped to oblivion in order to conform to an image which the general public would regard as passable. Chelsea Clinton looked like just another fashion plate actress on Elle, and Sidibe's two covers for both Elle and V was famously cropped, because at a stretch they could deal with her face, but not her shape. Even a beautiful woman like Marissa Mayer was made to look like, if not better, than a supermodel when Vogue did a feature on her. So no, nobody would cut them down for their looks when it's been so tremendously 'tones down'.
I can almost assure you that if Vanity Fair had to cover these women, they would've applied exactly the same process.
On a lighter note, why was Michelle Obama bracketed with those women? I'm not an ardent follower, but come on, lol.